Discussion:
One man's success using a promisory note to pay a bill.
(too old to reply)
Jimmy_For_Freedom
2005-10-27 14:55:16 UTC
Permalink
From: "John A."
To: <undisclosed-recipients:>
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:11 PM
Subject: Note about the Promissory Note
As most of you know I had a heart attack and had
medical cost with no
insurance.Well I have had some success with the
Promissory Note. I am
sitting here totally blown away by this. I had a
bill of over $67,000.00
to the hospital. I hand delivered the promissory
note to them 1 1/2
weeks ago on a monday. Have been waiting to have
them notify me that it
was worthless. I just got the mail and had a letter
from their
headquarters out of Las Vegas. I was sure it was a
notice that it would
be bad news. I am amazed I opened it and it was a
refund check for
$10,053.80. It was an overpayment on my part. It
seems that since I paid
it in full they gave me discounts. This is my true
story. I figured if
any one could make the promissory note work it would
be the hospital. I
am rejoicing.
Love and Peace
John
Abbot
2005-10-28 17:51:55 UTC
Permalink
Abbot) Jimmy, a promissory note is a contract detailing the terms of a
promise by one party (the maker) to pay a sum of money to the other
(the payee). The obligation may arise from the repayment of a loan or
from another form of debt.

If John's intent is not to pay the hospital then his note amounts to
fraud.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
From: "John A."
To: <undisclosed-recipients:>
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:11 PM
Subject: Note about the Promissory Note
As most of you know I had a heart attack and had
medical cost with no
insurance.Well I have had some success with the
Promissory Note. I am
sitting here totally blown away by this. I had a
bill of over $67,000.00
to the hospital. I hand delivered the promissory
note to them 1 1/2
weeks ago on a monday. Have been waiting to have
them notify me that it
was worthless. I just got the mail and had a letter
from their
headquarters out of Las Vegas. I was sure it was a
notice that it would
be bad news. I am amazed I opened it and it was a
refund check for
$10,053.80. It was an overpayment on my part. It
seems that since I paid
it in full they gave me discounts. This is my true
story. I figured if
any one could make the promissory note work it would
be the hospital. I
am rejoicing.
Love and Peace
John
Jimmy_For_Freedom
2005-10-28 18:46:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Abbot
Abbot) Jimmy, a promissory note is a contract detailing the terms of a
promise by one party (the maker) to pay a sum of money to the other
(the payee). The obligation may arise from the repayment of a loan or
from another form of debt.
If John's intent is not to pay the hospital then his note amounts to
fraud.
But since there is no lawful money of account, it appears his payment
with a promissory note was perfectly valid. Further, since the hospital
would have negotiated the note with a clearing house, the clearing
house would have alerted the hospital if the note was indeed fraud.
However, there was no fraud alert issued. The process stands as valid.

This is only one of several debts retired through the use of promissory
notes that I have heard of recently. No where, has there been a hint of
fraud. Your castle ideals built on slave labor is collapsing like a
pile of salt.
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
From: "John A."
To: <undisclosed-recipients:>
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:11 PM
Subject: Note about the Promissory Note
As most of you know I had a heart attack and had
medical cost with no
insurance.Well I have had some success with the
Promissory Note. I am
sitting here totally blown away by this. I had a
bill of over $67,000.00
to the hospital. I hand delivered the promissory
note to them 1 1/2
weeks ago on a monday. Have been waiting to have
them notify me that it
was worthless. I just got the mail and had a letter
from their
headquarters out of Las Vegas. I was sure it was a
notice that it would
be bad news. I am amazed I opened it and it was a
refund check for
$10,053.80. It was an overpayment on my part. It
seems that since I paid
it in full they gave me discounts. This is my true
story. I figured if
any one could make the promissory note work it would
be the hospital. I
am rejoicing.
Love and Peace
John
Abbot
2005-10-28 19:26:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Abbot) Jimmy, a promissory note is a contract detailing the terms of a
promise by one party (the maker) to pay a sum of money to the other
(the payee). The obligation may arise from the repayment of a loan or
from another form of debt.
If John's intent is not to pay the hospital then his note amounts to
fraud.
But since there is no lawful money of account, it appears his payment
with a promissory note was perfectly valid. Further, since the hospital
would have negotiated the note with a clearing house, the clearing
house would have alerted the hospital if the note was indeed fraud.
However, there was no fraud alert issued. The process stands as valid.
Abbot 2) That's detax jibberish, Jimmy. Whether you believe Canadian
and U.S. currency is "money" or not we have to assume the note promised
to pay up. If John doesn't make good the hospital will be after him.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
This is only one of several debts retired through the use of promissory
notes that I have heard of recently. No where, has there been a hint of
fraud.
Abbot) Spare me your secret proofs, Jimmy. I strongly suspect your
"cases" are nothing more than folks who are either playing at detaxing
(read: lying) or have not yet been run to ground by the people they
cheated.

I'd ask for documentation of your "cases" but you'd only wiennie out of
that challenge.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Your castle ideals built on slave labor is collapsing like a
pile of salt.
Abbot) Frankly, Jimmy, you are endorsing theft. I suspect you think the
ruse will fly because, in this case, it is aimed at the health care
system, who most folks see as greedy and villianous.

But the fact is your method could just easily be be used to cheat the
working class stiff down the road who fixes your car and then can't get
money from you because there is "no lawful money".

Shame on you.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
From: "John A."
To: <undisclosed-recipients:>
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:11 PM
Subject: Note about the Promissory Note
As most of you know I had a heart attack and had
medical cost with no
insurance.Well I have had some success with the
Promissory Note. I am
sitting here totally blown away by this. I had a
bill of over $67,000.00
to the hospital. I hand delivered the promissory
note to them 1 1/2
weeks ago on a monday. Have been waiting to have
them notify me that it
was worthless. I just got the mail and had a letter
from their
headquarters out of Las Vegas. I was sure it was a
notice that it would
be bad news. I am amazed I opened it and it was a
refund check for
$10,053.80. It was an overpayment on my part. It
seems that since I paid
it in full they gave me discounts. This is my true
story. I figured if
any one could make the promissory note work it would
be the hospital. I
am rejoicing.
Love and Peace
John
Korben Dallas
2005-10-29 01:21:57 UTC
Permalink
There's a logic problem: You gave them an IOU. But they gave you 10K cash
in return for having the IOU too high.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
From: "John A."
To: <undisclosed-recipients:>
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:11 PM
Subject: Note about the Promissory Note
As most of you know I had a heart attack and had
medical cost with no
insurance.Well I have had some success with the
Promissory Note. I am
sitting here totally blown away by this. I had a
bill of over $67,000.00
to the hospital. I hand delivered the promissory
note to them 1 1/2
weeks ago on a monday. Have been waiting to have
them notify me that it
was worthless. I just got the mail and had a letter
from their
headquarters out of Las Vegas. I was sure it was a
notice that it would
be bad news. I am amazed I opened it and it was a
refund check for
$10,053.80. It was an overpayment on my part. It
seems that since I paid
it in full they gave me discounts. This is my true
story. I figured if
any one could make the promissory note work it would
be the hospital. I
am rejoicing.
Love and Peace
John
Jimmy_For_Freedom
2005-10-29 13:07:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Korben Dallas
There's a logic problem: You gave them an IOU. But they gave you 10K cash
in return for having the IOU too high.
The promissory note was for the same amount of the bill. I beleive it
was/is redeemable in 2081. Contact me then to see if there's a problem
with the note and if the maker will be charged with fraud as some have
suggested this case might be.
Post by Korben Dallas
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
From: "John A."
To: <undisclosed-recipients:>
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:11 PM
Subject: Note about the Promissory Note
As most of you know I had a heart attack and had
medical cost with no
insurance.Well I have had some success with the
Promissory Note. I am
sitting here totally blown away by this. I had a
bill of over $67,000.00
to the hospital. I hand delivered the promissory
note to them 1 1/2
weeks ago on a monday. Have been waiting to have
them notify me that it
was worthless. I just got the mail and had a letter
from their
headquarters out of Las Vegas. I was sure it was a
notice that it would
be bad news. I am amazed I opened it and it was a
refund check for
$10,053.80. It was an overpayment on my part. It
seems that since I paid
it in full they gave me discounts. This is my true
story. I figured if
any one could make the promissory note work it would
be the hospital. I
am rejoicing.
Love and Peace
John
Fred
2005-10-31 05:16:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Korben Dallas
There's a logic problem: You gave them an IOU. But they gave you 10K cash
in return for having the IOU too high.
What probably happened is that the hospital sold the note to a finance
company, which will now go after the issuer with everything they've got.
Civil proceedings, criminal investigations, garnishments, attachments,
the whole ball of wax. My guess is that it's gonna get real ugly real fast.
Post by Korben Dallas
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
From: "John A."
To: <undisclosed-recipients:>
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:11 PM
Subject: Note about the Promissory Note
As most of you know I had a heart attack and had
medical cost with no
insurance.Well I have had some success with the
Promissory Note. I am
sitting here totally blown away by this. I had a
bill of over $67,000.00
to the hospital. I hand delivered the promissory
note to them 1 1/2
weeks ago on a monday. Have been waiting to have
them notify me that it
was worthless. I just got the mail and had a letter
from their
headquarters out of Las Vegas. I was sure it was a
notice that it would
be bad news. I am amazed I opened it and it was a
refund check for
$10,053.80. It was an overpayment on my part. It
seems that since I paid
it in full they gave me discounts. This is my true
story. I figured if
any one could make the promissory note work it would
be the hospital. I
am rejoicing.
Love and Peace
John
Jimmy_For_Freedom
2005-10-31 14:01:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fred
Post by Korben Dallas
There's a logic problem: You gave them an IOU. But they gave you 10K cash
in return for having the IOU too high.
What probably happened is that the hospital sold the note to a finance
company, which will now go after the issuer with everything they've got.
Civil proceedings, criminal investigations, garnishments, attachments,
the whole ball of wax. My guess is that it's gonna get real ugly real fast.
Wanna quit guessing and look at the facts?
Post by Fred
Post by Korben Dallas
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
From: "John A."
To: <undisclosed-recipients:>
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:11 PM
Subject: Note about the Promissory Note
As most of you know I had a heart attack and had
medical cost with no
insurance.Well I have had some success with the
Promissory Note. I am
sitting here totally blown away by this. I had a
bill of over $67,000.00
to the hospital. I hand delivered the promissory
note to them 1 1/2
weeks ago on a monday. Have been waiting to have
them notify me that it
was worthless. I just got the mail and had a letter
from their
headquarters out of Las Vegas. I was sure it was a
notice that it would
be bad news. I am amazed I opened it and it was a
refund check for
$10,053.80. It was an overpayment on my part. It
seems that since I paid
it in full they gave me discounts. This is my true
story. I figured if
any one could make the promissory note work it would
be the hospital. I
am rejoicing.
Love and Peace
John
Abbot
2005-10-31 18:27:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Fred
Post by Korben Dallas
There's a logic problem: You gave them an IOU. But they gave you 10K cash
in return for having the IOU too high.
What probably happened is that the hospital sold the note to a finance
company, which will now go after the issuer with everything they've got.
Civil proceedings, criminal investigations, garnishments, attachments,
the whole ball of wax. My guess is that it's gonna get real ugly real fast.
Wanna quit guessing and look at the facts?
Abbot) Sure, Jimmy. Give us John's full name the hospital's name. If
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Fred
Post by Korben Dallas
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
From: "John A."
To: <undisclosed-recipients:>
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:11 PM
Subject: Note about the Promissory Note
As most of you know I had a heart attack and had
medical cost with no
insurance.Well I have had some success with the
Promissory Note. I am
sitting here totally blown away by this. I had a
bill of over $67,000.00
to the hospital. I hand delivered the promissory
note to them 1 1/2
weeks ago on a monday. Have been waiting to have
them notify me that it
was worthless. I just got the mail and had a letter
from their
headquarters out of Las Vegas. I was sure it was a
notice that it would
be bad news. I am amazed I opened it and it was a
refund check for
$10,053.80. It was an overpayment on my part. It
seems that since I paid
it in full they gave me discounts. This is my true
story. I figured if
any one could make the promissory note work it would
be the hospital. I
am rejoicing.
Love and Peace
John
Jimmy_For_Freedom
2005-11-01 04:33:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Fred
Post by Korben Dallas
There's a logic problem: You gave them an IOU. But they gave you 10K cash
in return for having the IOU too high.
What probably happened is that the hospital sold the note to a finance
company, which will now go after the issuer with everything they've got.
Civil proceedings, criminal investigations, garnishments, attachments,
the whole ball of wax. My guess is that it's gonna get real ugly real fast.
Wanna quit guessing and look at the facts?
Abbot) Sure, Jimmy. Give us John's full name the hospital's name. If
Sure.
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Fred
Post by Korben Dallas
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
From: "John A."
To: <undisclosed-recipients:>
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:11 PM
Subject: Note about the Promissory Note
As most of you know I had a heart attack and had
medical cost with no
insurance.Well I have had some success with the
Promissory Note. I am
sitting here totally blown away by this. I had a
bill of over $67,000.00
to the hospital. I hand delivered the promissory
note to them 1 1/2
weeks ago on a monday. Have been waiting to have
them notify me that it
was worthless. I just got the mail and had a letter
from their
headquarters out of Las Vegas. I was sure it was a
notice that it would
be bad news. I am amazed I opened it and it was a
refund check for
$10,053.80. It was an overpayment on my part. It
seems that since I paid
it in full they gave me discounts. This is my true
story. I figured if
any one could make the promissory note work it would
be the hospital. I
am rejoicing.
Love and Peace
John
Abbot
2005-11-01 19:06:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Fred
Post by Korben Dallas
There's a logic problem: You gave them an IOU. But they gave you 10K cash
in return for having the IOU too high.
What probably happened is that the hospital sold the note to a finance
company, which will now go after the issuer with everything they've got.
Civil proceedings, criminal investigations, garnishments, attachments,
the whole ball of wax. My guess is that it's gonna get real ugly real fast.
Wanna quit guessing and look at the facts?
Abbot) Sure, Jimmy. Give us John's full name the hospital's name. If
Sure.
Abbot 2) "Sure", as in you will email the information?

If that's what you mean you can send the email any time. As of 2:05 EST
I don't have it in my in box.
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Fred
Post by Korben Dallas
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
From: "John A."
To: <undisclosed-recipients:>
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:11 PM
Subject: Note about the Promissory Note
As most of you know I had a heart attack and had
medical cost with no
insurance.Well I have had some success with the
Promissory Note. I am
sitting here totally blown away by this. I had a
bill of over $67,000.00
to the hospital. I hand delivered the promissory
note to them 1 1/2
weeks ago on a monday. Have been waiting to have
them notify me that it
was worthless. I just got the mail and had a letter
from their
headquarters out of Las Vegas. I was sure it was a
notice that it would
be bad news. I am amazed I opened it and it was a
refund check for
$10,053.80. It was an overpayment on my part. It
seems that since I paid
it in full they gave me discounts. This is my true
story. I figured if
any one could make the promissory note work it would
be the hospital. I
am rejoicing.
Love and Peace
John
Jimmy_For_Freedom
2005-11-02 00:01:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Abbot
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Fred
Post by Korben Dallas
There's a logic problem: You gave them an IOU. But they gave you 10K cash
in return for having the IOU too high.
What probably happened is that the hospital sold the note to a finance
company, which will now go after the issuer with everything they've got.
Civil proceedings, criminal investigations, garnishments, attachments,
the whole ball of wax. My guess is that it's gonna get real ugly real fast.
Wanna quit guessing and look at the facts?
Abbot) Sure, Jimmy. Give us John's full name the hospital's name. If
Sure.
Abbot 2) "Sure", as in you will email the information?
If that's what you mean you can send the email any time. As of 2:05 EST
I don't have it in my in box.
As of 2:45, I had more important things to do than answer your beck and
call.
Post by Abbot
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Fred
Post by Korben Dallas
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
From: "John A."
To: <undisclosed-recipients:>
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:11 PM
Subject: Note about the Promissory Note
As most of you know I had a heart attack and had
medical cost with no
insurance.Well I have had some success with the
Promissory Note. I am
sitting here totally blown away by this. I had a
bill of over $67,000.00
to the hospital. I hand delivered the promissory
note to them 1 1/2
weeks ago on a monday. Have been waiting to have
them notify me that it
was worthless. I just got the mail and had a letter
from their
headquarters out of Las Vegas. I was sure it was a
notice that it would
be bad news. I am amazed I opened it and it was a
refund check for
$10,053.80. It was an overpayment on my part. It
seems that since I paid
it in full they gave me discounts. This is my true
story. I figured if
any one could make the promissory note work it would
be the hospital. I
am rejoicing.
Love and Peace
John
Abbot
2005-11-02 13:52:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Fred
Post by Korben Dallas
There's a logic problem: You gave them an IOU. But they gave you 10K cash
in return for having the IOU too high.
What probably happened is that the hospital sold the note to a finance
company, which will now go after the issuer with everything they've got.
Civil proceedings, criminal investigations, garnishments, attachments,
the whole ball of wax. My guess is that it's gonna get real ugly real fast.
Wanna quit guessing and look at the facts?
Abbot) Sure, Jimmy. Give us John's full name the hospital's name. If
Sure.
Abbot 2) "Sure", as in you will email the information?
If that's what you mean you can send the email any time. As of 2:05 EST
I don't have it in my in box.
As of 2:45, I had more important things to do than answer your beck and
call.
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
Jimmy_For_Freedom
2005-11-02 14:01:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Fred
Post by Korben Dallas
There's a logic problem: You gave them an IOU. But they gave you 10K cash
in return for having the IOU too high.
What probably happened is that the hospital sold the note to a finance
company, which will now go after the issuer with everything they've got.
Civil proceedings, criminal investigations, garnishments, attachments,
the whole ball of wax. My guess is that it's gonna get real ugly real fast.
Wanna quit guessing and look at the facts?
Abbot) Sure, Jimmy. Give us John's full name the hospital's name. If
Sure.
Abbot 2) "Sure", as in you will email the information?
If that's what you mean you can send the email any time. As of 2:05 EST
I don't have it in my in box.
As of 2:45, I had more important things to do than answer your beck and
call.
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Abbot
2005-11-02 14:08:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Fred
Post by Korben Dallas
There's a logic problem: You gave them an IOU. But they gave you 10K cash
in return for having the IOU too high.
What probably happened is that the hospital sold the note to a finance
company, which will now go after the issuer with everything they've got.
Civil proceedings, criminal investigations, garnishments, attachments,
the whole ball of wax. My guess is that it's gonna get real ugly real fast.
Wanna quit guessing and look at the facts?
Abbot) Sure, Jimmy. Give us John's full name the hospital's name. If
Sure.
Abbot 2) "Sure", as in you will email the information?
If that's what you mean you can send the email any time. As of 2:05 EST
I don't have it in my in box.
As of 2:45, I had more important things to do than answer your beck and
call.
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Abbot 4) Jimmy, you implied you'd provide the information. I even gave
you my email address and later sent you an email requesting John's full
name and the hospital.

All you had to do was reply.

Your trickery on this point makes the reader suspect your original post
regarding the dishonest practice of using promissory notes to cheat
others was a fake through and through.
Jimmy_For_Freedom
2005-11-02 14:27:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Fred
Post by Korben Dallas
There's a logic problem: You gave them an IOU. But they gave you 10K cash
in return for having the IOU too high.
What probably happened is that the hospital sold the note to a finance
company, which will now go after the issuer with everything they've got.
Civil proceedings, criminal investigations, garnishments, attachments,
the whole ball of wax. My guess is that it's gonna get real ugly real fast.
Wanna quit guessing and look at the facts?
Abbot) Sure, Jimmy. Give us John's full name the hospital's name. If
Sure.
Abbot 2) "Sure", as in you will email the information?
If that's what you mean you can send the email any time. As of 2:05 EST
I don't have it in my in box.
As of 2:45, I had more important things to do than answer your beck and
call.
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Abbot 4) Jimmy, you implied you'd provide the information. I even gave
you my email address and later sent you an email requesting John's full
name and the hospital.
All you had to do was reply.
Your trickery on this point makes the reader suspect your original post
regarding the dishonest practice of using promissory notes to cheat
others was a fake through and through.
Say what you want. I know what you're all about and ain't about to fall
for your tricks.
Abbot
2005-11-02 14:37:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Fred
Post by Korben Dallas
There's a logic problem: You gave them an IOU. But they gave you 10K cash
in return for having the IOU too high.
What probably happened is that the hospital sold the note to a finance
company, which will now go after the issuer with everything they've got.
Civil proceedings, criminal investigations, garnishments, attachments,
the whole ball of wax. My guess is that it's gonna get real ugly real fast.
Wanna quit guessing and look at the facts?
Abbot) Sure, Jimmy. Give us John's full name the hospital's name. If
Sure.
Abbot 2) "Sure", as in you will email the information?
If that's what you mean you can send the email any time. As of 2:05 EST
I don't have it in my in box.
As of 2:45, I had more important things to do than answer your beck and
call.
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Abbot 4) Jimmy, you implied you'd provide the information. I even gave
you my email address and later sent you an email requesting John's full
name and the hospital.
All you had to do was reply.
Your trickery on this point makes the reader suspect your original post
regarding the dishonest practice of using promissory notes to cheat
others was a fake through and through.
Say what you want. I know what you're all about and ain't about to fall
for your tricks.
Abbot 5) Jimmy, as it stands, you can't substantiate the facts of your
post. Your unwillingness to respond honestly puts you and your claim in
a sad light.
Jimmy_For_Freedom
2005-11-02 14:54:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Fred
Post by Korben Dallas
There's a logic problem: You gave them an IOU. But they gave you 10K cash
in return for having the IOU too high.
What probably happened is that the hospital sold the note to a finance
company, which will now go after the issuer with everything they've got.
Civil proceedings, criminal investigations, garnishments, attachments,
the whole ball of wax. My guess is that it's gonna get real ugly real fast.
Wanna quit guessing and look at the facts?
Abbot) Sure, Jimmy. Give us John's full name the hospital's name. If
Sure.
Abbot 2) "Sure", as in you will email the information?
If that's what you mean you can send the email any time. As of 2:05 EST
I don't have it in my in box.
As of 2:45, I had more important things to do than answer your beck and
call.
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Abbot 4) Jimmy, you implied you'd provide the information. I even gave
you my email address and later sent you an email requesting John's full
name and the hospital.
All you had to do was reply.
Your trickery on this point makes the reader suspect your original post
regarding the dishonest practice of using promissory notes to cheat
others was a fake through and through.
Say what you want. I know what you're all about and ain't about to fall
for your tricks.
Abbot 5) Jimmy, as it stands, you can't substantiate the facts of your
post. Your unwillingness to respond honestly puts you and your claim in
a sad light.
I can but I don't care to for you.
Abbot
2005-11-02 15:01:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Fred
Post by Korben Dallas
There's a logic problem: You gave them an IOU. But they gave you 10K cash
in return for having the IOU too high.
What probably happened is that the hospital sold the note to a finance
company, which will now go after the issuer with everything they've got.
Civil proceedings, criminal investigations, garnishments, attachments,
the whole ball of wax. My guess is that it's gonna get real ugly real fast.
Wanna quit guessing and look at the facts?
Abbot) Sure, Jimmy. Give us John's full name the hospital's name. If
Sure.
Abbot 2) "Sure", as in you will email the information?
If that's what you mean you can send the email any time. As of 2:05 EST
I don't have it in my in box.
As of 2:45, I had more important things to do than answer your beck and
call.
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Abbot 4) Jimmy, you implied you'd provide the information. I even gave
you my email address and later sent you an email requesting John's full
name and the hospital.
All you had to do was reply.
Your trickery on this point makes the reader suspect your original post
regarding the dishonest practice of using promissory notes to cheat
others was a fake through and through.
Say what you want. I know what you're all about and ain't about to fall
for your tricks.
Abbot 5) Jimmy, as it stands, you can't substantiate the facts of your
post. Your unwillingness to respond honestly puts you and your claim in
a sad light.
I can but I don't care to for you.
Abbot 6) Considering that you used, unsuccessfully, this same ruse
regarding "secret information" said you had from the British
Parliamentary Library and again when you said you had the Porisky
transcripts, it is not likely that anyone will believe you, Jimmy.
Jimmy_For_Freedom
2005-11-02 15:07:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Fred
Post by Korben Dallas
There's a logic problem: You gave them an IOU. But they gave you 10K cash
in return for having the IOU too high.
What probably happened is that the hospital sold the note to a finance
company, which will now go after the issuer with everything they've got.
Civil proceedings, criminal investigations, garnishments, attachments,
the whole ball of wax. My guess is that it's gonna get real ugly real fast.
Wanna quit guessing and look at the facts?
Abbot) Sure, Jimmy. Give us John's full name the hospital's name. If
Sure.
Abbot 2) "Sure", as in you will email the information?
If that's what you mean you can send the email any time. As of 2:05 EST
I don't have it in my in box.
As of 2:45, I had more important things to do than answer your beck and
call.
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Abbot 4) Jimmy, you implied you'd provide the information. I even gave
you my email address and later sent you an email requesting John's full
name and the hospital.
All you had to do was reply.
Your trickery on this point makes the reader suspect your original post
regarding the dishonest practice of using promissory notes to cheat
others was a fake through and through.
Say what you want. I know what you're all about and ain't about to fall
for your tricks.
Abbot 5) Jimmy, as it stands, you can't substantiate the facts of your
post. Your unwillingness to respond honestly puts you and your claim in
a sad light.
I can but I don't care to for you.
Abbot 6) Considering that you used, unsuccessfully, this same ruse
regarding "secret information" said you had from the British
Parliamentary Library and again when you said you had the Porisky
transcripts, it is not likely that anyone will believe you, Jimmy.
I also don't care what you try to infer on others to believe as
"presummably" true or untrue.
Seth Breidbart
2005-11-02 17:58:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Do you define "legitimate" to exclude anyone who asks for it?

If not, you can send it to me. I don't know how soon I'll have time
to check (or what I can learn, given various privacy laws) but we'll
see.

Seth
Abbot
2005-11-03 14:12:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Seth Breidbart
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Do you define "legitimate" to exclude anyone who asks for it?
If not, you can send it to me. I don't know how soon I'll have time
to check (or what I can learn, given various privacy laws) but we'll
see.
Seth
Abbot 4) So has Jimmy sent the information on?

Jimmy?

Seth?
Jimmy_For_Freedom
2005-11-03 15:59:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Abbot
Post by Seth Breidbart
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Do you define "legitimate" to exclude anyone who asks for it?
If not, you can send it to me. I don't know how soon I'll have time
to check (or what I can learn, given various privacy laws) but we'll
see.
Seth
Abbot 4) So has Jimmy sent the information on?
Jimmy?
Seth?
So you think Seth is a more legiitimate recipient than you, Jack'O?
Abbot
2005-11-03 16:24:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Seth Breidbart
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Do you define "legitimate" to exclude anyone who asks for it?
If not, you can send it to me. I don't know how soon I'll have time
to check (or what I can learn, given various privacy laws) but we'll
see.
Seth
Abbot 4) So has Jimmy sent the information on?
Jimmy?
Seth?
So you think Seth is a more legiitimate recipient than you, Jack'O?
Abbot 5) Like every other claim you make here you can't back this one
up, no matter who asks for proof.

I don't believe you have documentation of your claim. I don't believe
you ever did.

I suspect the whole think was make up, by you, to make it look like you
are somebody in the detax cult.

I believe you are a lair. And not even a good one at that.
Jimmy_For_Freedom
2005-11-03 20:37:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Seth Breidbart
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Do you define "legitimate" to exclude anyone who asks for it?
If not, you can send it to me. I don't know how soon I'll have time
to check (or what I can learn, given various privacy laws) but we'll
see.
Seth
Abbot 4) So has Jimmy sent the information on?
Jimmy?
Seth?
So you think Seth is a more legiitimate recipient than you, Jack'O?
Abbot 5) Like every other claim you make here you can't back this one
up, no matter who asks for proof.
I don't believe you have documentation of your claim. I don't believe
you ever did.
I suspect the whole think was make up, by you, to make it look like you
are somebody in the detax cult.
I believe you are a lair. And not even a good one at that.
Believe what you want. If I have it and therefore have the facts while
you publicly declare that you believe otherwise and thereby believe a
falsity, then who is the fool?
Abbot
2005-11-03 22:09:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Seth Breidbart
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Do you define "legitimate" to exclude anyone who asks for it?
If not, you can send it to me. I don't know how soon I'll have time
to check (or what I can learn, given various privacy laws) but we'll
see.
Seth
Abbot 4) So has Jimmy sent the information on?
Jimmy?
Seth?
So you think Seth is a more legiitimate recipient than you, Jack'O?
Abbot 5) Like every other claim you make here you can't back this one
up, no matter who asks for proof.
I don't believe you have documentation of your claim. I don't believe
you ever did.
I suspect the whole think was make up, by you, to make it look like you
are somebody in the detax cult.
I believe you are a lair. And not even a good one at that.
Believe what you want. If I have it
Abbot 6) "If" you have it! I believe you don't.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
and therefore have the facts whileyou publicly declare that you believe otherwise and
thereby believe a falsity,
Abbot 6) If you want to prove that I am supporting a falsity all you
have do to is support your claim.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
. . .then who is the fool?
Abbot 6) You, since your public declarations have prove worthless, so
far.

You make unbelievable claims and when it comes time to prove them you
always back out. In some cases, like the Porisky, it is proven you
deceive. Now you want the reader to believe that you have a secrect
that backs you up.

I suspect you got nothing and won't send information to anyone for the
simple reason that you don't have any creditable documentation of your
claim.

Get it, sh*tforbrains, it's a challenge.
Abbot
2005-11-03 22:29:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Seth Breidbart
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Do you define "legitimate" to exclude anyone who asks for it?
If not, you can send it to me. I don't know how soon I'll have time
to check (or what I can learn, given various privacy laws) but we'll
see.
Seth
Abbot 4) So has Jimmy sent the information on?
Jimmy?
Seth?
So you think Seth is a more legiitimate recipient than you, Jack'O?
Abbot 5) Like every other claim you make here you can't back this one
up, no matter who asks for proof.
I don't believe you have documentation of your claim. I don't believe
you ever did.
I suspect the whole think was make up, by you, to make it look like you
are somebody in the detax cult.
I believe you are a lair. And not even a good one at that.
Believe what you want. If I have it
Abbot 6) "If" you have it! I believe you don't.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
and therefore have the facts whileyou publicly declare that you believe otherwise and
thereby believe a falsity,
Abbot 6) If you want to prove that I am supporting a falsity all you
have do to is support your claim.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
. . .then who is the fool?
Abbot 6) You, since your public declarations have prove worthless, so
far.

You make unbelievable claims and when it comes time to prove them you
always back out. In some cases, like the Porisky, it is proven you
deceive. Now you want the reader to believe that you have a secrect
that backs you up.

I suspect you got nothing and won't send information to anyone for the
simple reason that you don't have any creditable documentation of your
claim.

Get it, sh*tforbrains, it's a challenge.
Abbot
2005-11-03 22:29:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Seth Breidbart
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Do you define "legitimate" to exclude anyone who asks for it?
If not, you can send it to me. I don't know how soon I'll have time
to check (or what I can learn, given various privacy laws) but we'll
see.
Seth
Abbot 4) So has Jimmy sent the information on?
Jimmy?
Seth?
So you think Seth is a more legiitimate recipient than you, Jack'O?
Abbot 5) Like every other claim you make here you can't back this one
up, no matter who asks for proof.
I don't believe you have documentation of your claim. I don't believe
you ever did.
I suspect the whole think was make up, by you, to make it look like you
are somebody in the detax cult.
I believe you are a lair. And not even a good one at that.
Believe what you want. If I have it
Abbot 6) "If" you have it! I believe you don't.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
and therefore have the facts whileyou publicly declare that you believe otherwise and
thereby believe a falsity,
Abbot 6) If you want to prove that I am supporting a falsity all you
have do to is support your claim.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
. . .then who is the fool?
Abbot 6) You, since your public declarations have prove worthless, so
far.

You make unbelievable claims and when it comes time to prove them you
always back out. In some cases, like the Porisky, it is proven you
deceive. Now you want the reader to believe that you have a secrect
that backs you up.

I suspect you got nothing and won't send information to anyone for the
simple reason that you don't have any creditable documentation of your
claim.

Get it, sh*tforbrains, it's a challenge.
Jimmy_For_Freedom
2005-11-04 05:16:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Seth Breidbart
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Do you define "legitimate" to exclude anyone who asks for it?
If not, you can send it to me. I don't know how soon I'll have time
to check (or what I can learn, given various privacy laws) but we'll
see.
Seth
Abbot 4) So has Jimmy sent the information on?
Jimmy?
Seth?
So you think Seth is a more legiitimate recipient than you, Jack'O?
Abbot 5) Like every other claim you make here you can't back this one
up, no matter who asks for proof.
I don't believe you have documentation of your claim. I don't believe
you ever did.
I suspect the whole think was make up, by you, to make it look like you
are somebody in the detax cult.
I believe you are a lair. And not even a good one at that.
Believe what you want. If I have it
Abbot 6) "If" you have it! I believe you don't.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
and therefore have the facts whileyou publicly declare that you believe otherwise and
thereby believe a falsity,
Abbot 6) If you want to prove that I am supporting a falsity all you
have do to is support your claim.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
. . .then who is the fool?
Abbot 6) You, since your public declarations have prove worthless, so
far.
You make unbelievable claims and when it comes time to prove them you
always back out. In some cases, like the Porisky, it is proven you
deceive. Now you want the reader to believe that you have a secrect
that backs you up.
I suspect you got nothing and won't send information to anyone for the
simple reason that you don't have any creditable documentation of your
claim.
Get it, sh*tforbrains, it's a challenge.
Oh, I got it like I said I did. But it's your choice to believe
otherwise. No one is forcing your choice but yourself. Or do others
actually have control of your beliefs?
Abbot
2005-11-04 15:09:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Seth Breidbart
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Do you define "legitimate" to exclude anyone who asks for it?
If not, you can send it to me. I don't know how soon I'll have time
to check (or what I can learn, given various privacy laws) but we'll
see.
Seth
Abbot 4) So has Jimmy sent the information on?
Jimmy?
Seth?
So you think Seth is a more legiitimate recipient than you, Jack'O?
Abbot 5) Like every other claim you make here you can't back this one
up, no matter who asks for proof.
I don't believe you have documentation of your claim. I don't believe
you ever did.
I suspect the whole think was make up, by you, to make it look like you
are somebody in the detax cult.
I believe you are a lair. And not even a good one at that.
Believe what you want. If I have it
Abbot 6) "If" you have it! I believe you don't.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
and therefore have the facts whileyou publicly declare that you believe otherwise and
thereby believe a falsity,
Abbot 6) If you want to prove that I am supporting a falsity all you
have do to is support your claim.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
. . .then who is the fool?
Abbot 6) You, since your public declarations have prove worthless, so
far.
You make unbelievable claims and when it comes time to prove them you
always back out. In some cases, like the Porisky, it is proven you
deceive. Now you want the reader to believe that you have a secrect
that backs you up.
I suspect you got nothing and won't send information to anyone for the
simple reason that you don't have any creditable documentation of your
claim.
Get it, sh*tforbrains, it's a challenge.
Oh, I got it like I said I did. But it's your choice to believe
otherwise. No one is forcing your choice but yourself. Or do others
actually have control of your beliefs?
Abbot 7) It's time you put up or shut up, Jimmy. You made the claim
now back it up!
Jimmy_For_Freedom
2005-11-04 16:16:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Seth Breidbart
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Do you define "legitimate" to exclude anyone who asks for it?
If not, you can send it to me. I don't know how soon I'll have time
to check (or what I can learn, given various privacy laws) but we'll
see.
Seth
Abbot 4) So has Jimmy sent the information on?
Jimmy?
Seth?
So you think Seth is a more legiitimate recipient than you, Jack'O?
Abbot 5) Like every other claim you make here you can't back this one
up, no matter who asks for proof.
I don't believe you have documentation of your claim. I don't believe
you ever did.
I suspect the whole think was make up, by you, to make it look like you
are somebody in the detax cult.
I believe you are a lair. And not even a good one at that.
Believe what you want. If I have it
Abbot 6) "If" you have it! I believe you don't.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
and therefore have the facts whileyou publicly declare that you believe otherwise and
thereby believe a falsity,
Abbot 6) If you want to prove that I am supporting a falsity all you
have do to is support your claim.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
. . .then who is the fool?
Abbot 6) You, since your public declarations have prove worthless, so
far.
You make unbelievable claims and when it comes time to prove them you
always back out. In some cases, like the Porisky, it is proven you
deceive. Now you want the reader to believe that you have a secrect
that backs you up.
I suspect you got nothing and won't send information to anyone for the
simple reason that you don't have any creditable documentation of your
claim.
Get it, sh*tforbrains, it's a challenge.
Oh, I got it like I said I did. But it's your choice to believe
otherwise. No one is forcing your choice but yourself. Or do others
actually have control of your beliefs?
Abbot 7) It's time you put up or shut up, Jimmy. You made the claim
now back it up!
Who would benefit? You'd only try to down play it. And besides, it's
fun watching you squirm.
Abbot
2005-11-04 16:21:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Seth Breidbart
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Abbot 3) So, Jimmy, when to you plan to take time out in your busy
schedule to provide this information that shouldn't require more than a
cut andd paste from, John's email?
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Do you define "legitimate" to exclude anyone who asks for it?
If not, you can send it to me. I don't know how soon I'll have time
to check (or what I can learn, given various privacy laws) but we'll
see.
Seth
Abbot 4) So has Jimmy sent the information on?
Jimmy?
Seth?
So you think Seth is a more legiitimate recipient than you, Jack'O?
Abbot 5) Like every other claim you make here you can't back this one
up, no matter who asks for proof.
I don't believe you have documentation of your claim. I don't believe
you ever did.
I suspect the whole think was make up, by you, to make it look like you
are somebody in the detax cult.
I believe you are a lair. And not even a good one at that.
Believe what you want. If I have it
Abbot 6) "If" you have it! I believe you don't.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
and therefore have the facts whileyou publicly declare that you believe otherwise and
thereby believe a falsity,
Abbot 6) If you want to prove that I am supporting a falsity all you
have do to is support your claim.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
. . .then who is the fool?
Abbot 6) You, since your public declarations have prove worthless, so
far.
You make unbelievable claims and when it comes time to prove them you
always back out. In some cases, like the Porisky, it is proven you
deceive. Now you want the reader to believe that you have a secrect
that backs you up.
I suspect you got nothing and won't send information to anyone for the
simple reason that you don't have any creditable documentation of your
claim.
Get it, sh*tforbrains, it's a challenge.
Oh, I got it like I said I did. But it's your choice to believe
otherwise. No one is forcing your choice but yourself. Or do others
actually have control of your beliefs?
Abbot 7) It's time you put up or shut up, Jimmy. You made the claim
now back it up!
Who would benefit? You'd only try to down play it. And besides, it's
fun watching you squirm.
Abbot 8) Your basis in reality isn't much stronger than Eldon's.

You made yet another bazaar claim you can't back up and you think
that's a plus for you.

Seth Breidbart
2005-11-03 17:31:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Seth Breidbart
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Do you define "legitimate" to exclude anyone who asks for it?
Apparently so.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Seth Breidbart
If not, you can send it to me. I don't know how soon I'll have time
to check (or what I can learn, given various privacy laws) but we'll
see.
Abbot 4) So has Jimmy sent the information on?
Seth?
I haven't received it.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
So you think Seth is a more legiitimate recipient than you, Jack'O?
Unlike both of you, I post under my real name.

Seth
Abbot
2005-11-03 17:41:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Seth Breidbart
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Seth Breidbart
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
You're the only one who's requested it. And we all know what you'll try
to do with it. If someone legitimate wants it, I'll email it to them.
Do you define "legitimate" to exclude anyone who asks for it?
Apparently so.
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Post by Abbot
Post by Seth Breidbart
If not, you can send it to me. I don't know how soon I'll have time
to check (or what I can learn, given various privacy laws) but we'll
see.
Abbot 4) So has Jimmy sent the information on?
Seth?
I haven't received it.
Abbot 5) Don't hold your breath waiting.
Post by Seth Breidbart
Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
So you think Seth is a more legiitimate recipient than you, Jack'O?
Unlike both of you, I post under my real name.
Seth
Loading...