Discussion:
FINALLY! An American with Some Guts and Morality
(too old to reply)
Vicegerent
2006-08-15 15:18:02 UTC
Permalink
Ehrwen Watada
BY: Dahr Jamail
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/081406A.shtml
Date Published: 2006-08-14

On Saturday night, I was lucky enough to be at the Veterans for
Peace National Convention. For that night, Lt. Ehren Watada was
able to give the following speech, which I've just received permission
to post here. The speech was met with a powerful, standing ovation
from the vets who've been there.

Lt. Ehren Watada, for those who don't already know, became the first
commissioned officer to publicly refuse deployment to the unlawful
war and occupation in Iraq. While doing this on June 22, 2006, Watada
said, "As the order to take part in an illegal act is ultimately
unlawful as well, I must refuse that order."

Just as Watada took the stage and began to speak, over 50 members
of Iraq Veterans Against the War filed in behind him.

Watada, surprised by this and obviously taken aback by the symbolic
act, turned back to the audience, took some deep breaths,
then gave this speech:

Thank you everyone. Thank you all for your tremendous support.
How honored and delighted I am to be in the same room with you
tonight. I am deeply humbled by being in the company of such
wonderful speakers.

You are all true American patriots. Although long since out of
uniform, you continue to fight for the very same principles you
once swore to uphold and defend. No one knows the devastation
and suffering of war more than veterans - which is why we should
always be the first to prevent it.

I wasn't entirely sure what to say tonight. I thought as a leader in
general I should speak to motivate. Now I know that this isn't the
military and surely there are many out there who outranked me at
one point or another - and yes, I'm just a Lieutenant. And yet, I feel
as though we are all citizens of this great country and what I have to
say is not a matter of authority - but from one citizen to another.

We have all seen this war tear apart our country over the past three
years. It seems as though nothing we've done, from vigils to protests
to letters to Congress, have had any effect in persuading the powers
that be. Tonight I will speak to you on my ideas for a change of
strategy. I am here tonight because I took a leap of faith.

My action is not the first and it certainly will not be the last.
Yet, on behalf of those who follow, I require your help - your
sacrifice - and that of countless other Americans. I may fail.
We may fail. But nothing we have tried has worked so far.
It is time for change and the change starts with all of us.

I stand before you today, not as an expert - not as one who pretends
to have all the answers. I am simply an American and a servant of the
American people. My humble opinions today are just that. I realize
that you may not agree with everything I have to say. However, I did
not choose to be a leader for popularity. I did it to serve and make
better the soldiers of this country. And I swore to carry out this
charge honorably under the rule of law.

Today, I speak with you about a radical idea. It is one born from
the very concept of the American soldier (or service member).
It became instrumental in ending the Vietnam War - but it has
been long since forgotten. The idea is this: that to stop an illegal
and unjust war, the soldiers can choose to stop fighting it.

Now it is not an easy task for the soldier. For he or she must be
aware that they are being used for ill-gain. They must hold themselves
responsible for individual action. They must remember duty to the
Constitution and the people supersedes the ideologies of their
leadership. The soldier must be willing to face ostracism by their
peers, worry over the survival of their families, and of course the
loss of personal freedom.

They must know that resisting an authoritarian government at home
is equally important to fighting a foreign aggressor on the
battlefield. Finally, those wearing the uniform must know beyond
any shadow of a doubt that by refusing immoral and illegal orders
they will be supported by the people not with mere words but by
action.

The American soldier must rise above the socialization that tells
them authority should always be obeyed without question. Rank
should be respected but never blindly followed. Awareness o the
history of atrocities and destruction committed in the name of
America - either through direct military intervention or by proxy
war - is crucial.

They must realize that this is a war not out of self-defense but
by choice, for profit and imperialistic domination. WMD, ties
to Al Qaeda, and ties to 9/11 never existed and never will.
The soldier must know that our narrowly and questionably
elected officials intentionally manipulated the evidence
presented to Congress, the public, and the world to make
the case for war.

They must know that neither Congress nor this administration has
the authority to violate the prohibition against pre-emptive war - an
American law that still stands today. This same administration uses
us for rampant violations of time-tested laws banning torture and
degradation of prisoners of war.

Though the American soldier wants to do right, the illegitimacy of the
occupation itself, the policies of this administration, and rules of
engagement of desperate field commanders will ultimately force
them to be party to war crimes. They must know some of these facts,
if not all, in order to act.

Mark Twain once remarked, "Each man must for himself alone decide
what is right and what is wrong, which course is patriotic and which
isn't. You cannot shirk this and be a man. To decide against your
conviction is to be an unqualified and inexcusable traitor, both to
yourself and to your country ..." By this, each and every American
soldier, marine, airman, and sailor is responsible for their choices
and their actions. The freedom to choose is only one that we can
deny ourselves.

The oath we take swears allegiance not to one man but to a
document of principles and laws designed to protect the people.
Enlisting in the military does not relinquish one's right to seek
the truth - neither does it excuse one from rational thought nor
the ability to distinguish between right and wrong. "I was only
following orders" is never an excuse.

The Nuremburg Trials showed America and the world that citizenry as
well as soldiers have the unrelinquishable obligation to refuse
complicity in war crimes perpetrated by their government. Widespread
torture and inhumane treatment of detainees is a war crime. A war
of aggression born through an unofficial policy of prevention is a
crime against the peace. An occupation violating the very essence
of international humanitarian law and sovereignty is a crime against
humanity.

These crimes are funded by our tax dollars. Should citizens choose
to remain silent through self-imposed ignorance or choice, it makes
them as culpable as the soldier in these crimes.

The Constitution is no mere document - neither is it old,
out-dated, or irrelevant. It is the embodiment of all that
Americans hold dear: truth, justice, and equality for all.
It is the formula for a government of the people and by
the people. It is a government that is transparent
and accountable to whom they serve. It dictates a
system of checks and balances and separation of
powers to prevent the evil that is tyranny.

As strong as the Constitution is, it is not foolproof. It does
not fully take into account the frailty of human nature.
Profit, greed, and hunger for power can corrupt individuals
as much as they can corrupt institutions. The founders of
the Constitution could not have imagined how money would
infect our political system. Neither could they believe a
standing army would be used for profit and manifest destiny.
Like any common dictatorship, soldiers would be ordered
to commit acts of such heinous nature as to be deemed
most ungentlemanly and unbecoming that of a free country.

The American soldier is not a mercenary. He or she does
not simply fight wars for payment. Indeed, the state of the
American soldier is worse than that of a mercenary. For a
soldier-for-hire can walk away if they are disgusted by their
employer's actions. Instead, especially when it comes to
war, American soldiers become indentured servants whether
they volunteer out of patriotism or are drafted through economic
desperation.

Does it matter what the soldier believes is morally right? If this
is a war of necessity, why force men and women to fight?
When it comes to a war of ideology, the lines between right
and wrong are blurred. How tragic it is when the term Catch-22
defines the modern American military.

Aside from the reality of indentured servitude, the American
soldier in theory is much nobler. Soldier or officer, when we
swear our oath it is first and foremost to the Constitution and
its protectorate, the people. If soldiers realized this war is
contrary to what the Constitution extols - if they stood up
and threw their weapons down - no President could ever
initiate a war of choice again. When we say, "... Against
all enemies foreign and domestic," what if elected leaders
became the enemy? Whose orders do we follow? The
answer is the conscience that lies in each soldier, each
American, and each human being. Our duty to the Constitution
is an obligation, not a choice.

The military, and especially the Army, is an institution of
fraternity and close-knit camaraderie. Peer pressure exists
to ensure cohesiveness but it stamps out individualism and
individual thought. The idea of brotherhood is difficult to pull
away from if the alternative is loneliness and isolation. If we
want soldiers to choose the right but difficult path - they
must know beyond any shadow of a doubt that they will
be supported by Americans.

To support the troops who resist, you must make your voices
heard. If they see thousands supporting me, they will know.
I have heard your support, as has Suzanne Swift, and Ricky
Clousing - but many others have not. Increasingly, more
soldiers are questioning what they are being asked to do.
Yet, the majority lack awareness to the truth that is buried
beneath the headlines. Many more see no alternative but
to obey. We must show open-minded soldiers
a choice and we must give them courage to act.

Three weeks ago, Sgt. Hernandez from the 172nd Stryker Brigade
was killed, leaving behind a wife and two children. In an interview,
his wife said he sacrificed his life so that his family could survive.
I'm sure Sgt. Hernandez cherished the camaraderie of his brothers,
but given a choice, I doubt he would put himself in a position to
leave his family husbandless and fatherless. Yet that's the point,
you see. People like Sgt. Hernandez don't have a choice.

The choices are to fight in Iraq or let your family starve. Many
soldiers don't refuse this war en mass because, like all of us,,
they value their families over their own lives and perhaps their
conscience. Who would willingly spend years in prison for principle
and morality while denying their family sustenance?

I tell this to you because you must know that to stop this war, for
the soldiers to stop fighting it, they must have the unconditional
support of the people. I have seen this support with my own eyes.
For me it was a leap of faith. For other soldiers, they do not have
that luxury. They must know it and you must show it to them.
Convince them that no matter how long they sit in prison, no
matter how long this country takes to right itself, their families
will have a roof over their heads, food in their stomachs,
opportunities and education. This is a daunting task. It requires
the sacrifice of all of us.

Why must Canadians feed and house our fellow Americans who
have chosen to do the right thing? We should be the ones taking
care of our own. Are we that powerless - are we that unwilling to
risk something for those who can truly end this war? How do you
support the troops but not the war? By supporting those who can
truly stop it; let them know that resistance to participate in an
illegal war is not futile and not without a future.

I have broken no law but the code of silence and unquestioning
loyalty. If I am guilty of any crime, it is that I learned too much
and cared too deeply for the meaningless loss of my fellow
soldiers and my fellow human beings. If I am to be punished it
should be for following the rule of law over the immoral orders
of one man. If I am to be punished it should be for not acting
sooner. Martin Luther King Jr. once said, "History will have
to record that the greatest tragedy of this period
... was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but
the appalling silence of the good people."

Now, I'm not a hero. I am a leader of men who said enough is enough.
Those who called for war prior to the invasion compared diplomacy with
Saddam to the compromises made with Hitler. I say, we compromise
now by allowing a government that uses war as the first option instead
of the last to act with impunity. Many have said this about the World
Trade Towers, "Never Again." I agree. Never again will we allow those
who threaten our way of life to reign free - be they terrorists or
elected officials. The time to fight back is now - the time to stand
up and be counted is today.

I'll end with one more Martin Luther King Jr. quote:

One who breaks an unjust law that conscience tells him is unjust,
and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to
arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in
reality expressing the highest respect for law.
Thank you and bless you all.


The only thing Watada said that I would disagree with is that
he claimed that he is not a hero. He is a leader, yet again,
by taking this stance. And he may never know how many
lives he has already touched.

Today, it is up to the anti-war movement to make sure his
leadership touches as many soldiers' lives in Iraq as possible.
Watada is making his stand. He needs continued support.

As he said, if more American soldiers in Iraq know that they,
along with their families, will be supported if they stand up
against this illegal occupation, countless more will follow,
and this repulsive war will end.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dahr Jamail is an independent journalist who has reported
for the Guardian, the Independent, and the Sunday Herald.
He now writes regularly for Inter Press Service and Truthout.
He maintains a web site at dahrjamailiraq.com.

Posted by: Vicegerent
Paul Thomas, CPA
2006-08-15 15:28:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Vicegerent
On Saturday night, I was lucky
Damn. I guess everyone can find someone given enough time and alcohol.
--
If electricity comes from electrons, does morality come from morons?
----------------
Paul A. Thomas, CPA
Athens, Georgia
Abbot
2006-08-15 15:33:43 UTC
Permalink
Abbot) Wake up and smell the coffee, you psycho. Countless Americans
have vehemently opposed the war in Iraq for years now. Some risking
careers and livelihoods to do so.

Or are you just trying to take the heat off StaR?
Post by Vicegerent
Ehrwen Watada
BY: Dahr Jamail
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/081406A.shtml
Date Published: 2006-08-14
On Saturday night, I was lucky enough to be at the Veterans for
Peace National Convention. For that night, Lt. Ehren Watada was
able to give the following speech, which I've just received permission
to post here. The speech was met with a powerful, standing ovation
from the vets who've been there.
Lt. Ehren Watada, for those who don't already know, became the first
commissioned officer to publicly refuse deployment to the unlawful
war and occupation in Iraq. While doing this on June 22, 2006, Watada
said, "As the order to take part in an illegal act is ultimately
unlawful as well, I must refuse that order."
Just as Watada took the stage and began to speak, over 50 members
of Iraq Veterans Against the War filed in behind him.
Watada, surprised by this and obviously taken aback by the symbolic
act, turned back to the audience, took some deep breaths,
Thank you everyone. Thank you all for your tremendous support.
How honored and delighted I am to be in the same room with you
tonight. I am deeply humbled by being in the company of such
wonderful speakers.
You are all true American patriots. Although long since out of
uniform, you continue to fight for the very same principles you
once swore to uphold and defend. No one knows the devastation
and suffering of war more than veterans - which is why we should
always be the first to prevent it.
I wasn't entirely sure what to say tonight. I thought as a leader in
general I should speak to motivate. Now I know that this isn't the
military and surely there are many out there who outranked me at
one point or another - and yes, I'm just a Lieutenant. And yet, I feel
as though we are all citizens of this great country and what I have to
say is not a matter of authority - but from one citizen to another.
We have all seen this war tear apart our country over the past three
years. It seems as though nothing we've done, from vigils to protests
to letters to Congress, have had any effect in persuading the powers
that be. Tonight I will speak to you on my ideas for a change of
strategy. I am here tonight because I took a leap of faith.
My action is not the first and it certainly will not be the last.
Yet, on behalf of those who follow, I require your help - your
sacrifice - and that of countless other Americans. I may fail.
We may fail. But nothing we have tried has worked so far.
It is time for change and the change starts with all of us.
I stand before you today, not as an expert - not as one who pretends
to have all the answers. I am simply an American and a servant of the
American people. My humble opinions today are just that. I realize
that you may not agree with everything I have to say. However, I did
not choose to be a leader for popularity. I did it to serve and make
better the soldiers of this country. And I swore to carry out this
charge honorably under the rule of law.
Today, I speak with you about a radical idea. It is one born from
the very concept of the American soldier (or service member).
It became instrumental in ending the Vietnam War - but it has
been long since forgotten. The idea is this: that to stop an illegal
and unjust war, the soldiers can choose to stop fighting it.
Now it is not an easy task for the soldier. For he or she must be
aware that they are being used for ill-gain. They must hold themselves
responsible for individual action. They must remember duty to the
Constitution and the people supersedes the ideologies of their
leadership. The soldier must be willing to face ostracism by their
peers, worry over the survival of their families, and of course the
loss of personal freedom.
They must know that resisting an authoritarian government at home
is equally important to fighting a foreign aggressor on the
battlefield. Finally, those wearing the uniform must know beyond
any shadow of a doubt that by refusing immoral and illegal orders
they will be supported by the people not with mere words but by
action.
The American soldier must rise above the socialization that tells
them authority should always be obeyed without question. Rank
should be respected but never blindly followed. Awareness o the
history of atrocities and destruction committed in the name of
America - either through direct military intervention or by proxy
war - is crucial.
They must realize that this is a war not out of self-defense but
by choice, for profit and imperialistic domination. WMD, ties
to Al Qaeda, and ties to 9/11 never existed and never will.
The soldier must know that our narrowly and questionably
elected officials intentionally manipulated the evidence
presented to Congress, the public, and the world to make
the case for war.
They must know that neither Congress nor this administration has
the authority to violate the prohibition against pre-emptive war - an
American law that still stands today. This same administration uses
us for rampant violations of time-tested laws banning torture and
degradation of prisoners of war.
Though the American soldier wants to do right, the illegitimacy of the
occupation itself, the policies of this administration, and rules of
engagement of desperate field commanders will ultimately force
them to be party to war crimes. They must know some of these facts,
if not all, in order to act.
Mark Twain once remarked, "Each man must for himself alone decide
what is right and what is wrong, which course is patriotic and which
isn't. You cannot shirk this and be a man. To decide against your
conviction is to be an unqualified and inexcusable traitor, both to
yourself and to your country ..." By this, each and every American
soldier, marine, airman, and sailor is responsible for their choices
and their actions. The freedom to choose is only one that we can
deny ourselves.
The oath we take swears allegiance not to one man but to a
document of principles and laws designed to protect the people.
Enlisting in the military does not relinquish one's right to seek
the truth - neither does it excuse one from rational thought nor
the ability to distinguish between right and wrong. "I was only
following orders" is never an excuse.
The Nuremburg Trials showed America and the world that citizenry as
well as soldiers have the unrelinquishable obligation to refuse
complicity in war crimes perpetrated by their government. Widespread
torture and inhumane treatment of detainees is a war crime. A war
of aggression born through an unofficial policy of prevention is a
crime against the peace. An occupation violating the very essence
of international humanitarian law and sovereignty is a crime against
humanity.
These crimes are funded by our tax dollars. Should citizens choose
to remain silent through self-imposed ignorance or choice, it makes
them as culpable as the soldier in these crimes.
The Constitution is no mere document - neither is it old,
out-dated, or irrelevant. It is the embodiment of all that
Americans hold dear: truth, justice, and equality for all.
It is the formula for a government of the people and by
the people. It is a government that is transparent
and accountable to whom they serve. It dictates a
system of checks and balances and separation of
powers to prevent the evil that is tyranny.
As strong as the Constitution is, it is not foolproof. It does
not fully take into account the frailty of human nature.
Profit, greed, and hunger for power can corrupt individuals
as much as they can corrupt institutions. The founders of
the Constitution could not have imagined how money would
infect our political system. Neither could they believe a
standing army would be used for profit and manifest destiny.
Like any common dictatorship, soldiers would be ordered
to commit acts of such heinous nature as to be deemed
most ungentlemanly and unbecoming that of a free country.
The American soldier is not a mercenary. He or she does
not simply fight wars for payment. Indeed, the state of the
American soldier is worse than that of a mercenary. For a
soldier-for-hire can walk away if they are disgusted by their
employer's actions. Instead, especially when it comes to
war, American soldiers become indentured servants whether
they volunteer out of patriotism or are drafted through economic
desperation.
Does it matter what the soldier believes is morally right? If this
is a war of necessity, why force men and women to fight?
When it comes to a war of ideology, the lines between right
and wrong are blurred. How tragic it is when the term Catch-22
defines the modern American military.
Aside from the reality of indentured servitude, the American
soldier in theory is much nobler. Soldier or officer, when we
swear our oath it is first and foremost to the Constitution and
its protectorate, the people. If soldiers realized this war is
contrary to what the Constitution extols - if they stood up
and threw their weapons down - no President could ever
initiate a war of choice again. When we say, "... Against
all enemies foreign and domestic," what if elected leaders
became the enemy? Whose orders do we follow? The
answer is the conscience that lies in each soldier, each
American, and each human being. Our duty to the Constitution
is an obligation, not a choice.
The military, and especially the Army, is an institution of
fraternity and close-knit camaraderie. Peer pressure exists
to ensure cohesiveness but it stamps out individualism and
individual thought. The idea of brotherhood is difficult to pull
away from if the alternative is loneliness and isolation. If we
want soldiers to choose the right but difficult path - they
must know beyond any shadow of a doubt that they will
be supported by Americans.
To support the troops who resist, you must make your voices
heard. If they see thousands supporting me, they will know.
I have heard your support, as has Suzanne Swift, and Ricky
Clousing - but many others have not. Increasingly, more
soldiers are questioning what they are being asked to do.
Yet, the majority lack awareness to the truth that is buried
beneath the headlines. Many more see no alternative but
to obey. We must show open-minded soldiers
a choice and we must give them courage to act.
Three weeks ago, Sgt. Hernandez from the 172nd Stryker Brigade
was killed, leaving behind a wife and two children. In an interview,
his wife said he sacrificed his life so that his family could survive.
I'm sure Sgt. Hernandez cherished the camaraderie of his brothers,
but given a choice, I doubt he would put himself in a position to
leave his family husbandless and fatherless. Yet that's the point,
you see. People like Sgt. Hernandez don't have a choice.
The choices are to fight in Iraq or let your family starve. Many
soldiers don't refuse this war en mass because, like all of us,,
they value their families over their own lives and perhaps their
conscience. Who would willingly spend years in prison for principle
and morality while denying their family sustenance?
I tell this to you because you must know that to stop this war, for
the soldiers to stop fighting it, they must have the unconditional
support of the people. I have seen this support with my own eyes.
For me it was a leap of faith. For other soldiers, they do not have
that luxury. They must know it and you must show it to them.
Convince them that no matter how long they sit in prison, no
matter how long this country takes to right itself, their families
will have a roof over their heads, food in their stomachs,
opportunities and education. This is a daunting task. It requires
the sacrifice of all of us.
Why must Canadians feed and house our fellow Americans who
have chosen to do the right thing? We should be the ones taking
care of our own. Are we that powerless - are we that unwilling to
risk something for those who can truly end this war? How do you
support the troops but not the war? By supporting those who can
truly stop it; let them know that resistance to participate in an
illegal war is not futile and not without a future.
I have broken no law but the code of silence and unquestioning
loyalty. If I am guilty of any crime, it is that I learned too much
and cared too deeply for the meaningless loss of my fellow
soldiers and my fellow human beings. If I am to be punished it
should be for following the rule of law over the immoral orders
of one man. If I am to be punished it should be for not acting
sooner. Martin Luther King Jr. once said, "History will have
to record that the greatest tragedy of this period
... was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but
the appalling silence of the good people."
Now, I'm not a hero. I am a leader of men who said enough is enough.
Those who called for war prior to the invasion compared diplomacy with
Saddam to the compromises made with Hitler. I say, we compromise
now by allowing a government that uses war as the first option instead
of the last to act with impunity. Many have said this about the World
Trade Towers, "Never Again." I agree. Never again will we allow those
who threaten our way of life to reign free - be they terrorists or
elected officials. The time to fight back is now - the time to stand
up and be counted is today.
One who breaks an unjust law that conscience tells him is unjust,
and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to
arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in
reality expressing the highest respect for law.
Thank you and bless you all.
The only thing Watada said that I would disagree with is that
he claimed that he is not a hero. He is a leader, yet again,
by taking this stance. And he may never know how many
lives he has already touched.
Today, it is up to the anti-war movement to make sure his
leadership touches as many soldiers' lives in Iraq as possible.
Watada is making his stand. He needs continued support.
As he said, if more American soldiers in Iraq know that they,
along with their families, will be supported if they stand up
against this illegal occupation, countless more will follow,
and this repulsive war will end.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dahr Jamail is an independent journalist who has reported
for the Guardian, the Independent, and the Sunday Herald.
He now writes regularly for Inter Press Service and Truthout.
He maintains a web site at dahrjamailiraq.com.
Posted by: Vicegerent
shrubkiller
2006-08-15 17:20:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Abbot
Abbot) Wake up and smell the coffee, you psycho. Countless Americans
have vehemently opposed the war in Iraq for years now.
Oh?...and what concrete actions have they taken?


Some risking
Post by Abbot
careers and livelihoods to do so.
Like you?...........risking your job as a damage control goon to post
the odd comment about Bush...........but defending the ZIONIST'S
banking and tax system for all you are worth?
Post by Abbot
Or are you just trying to take the heat off StaR?
If there's any "heat" on StaR it certainly wasn't applied by you
"Willkill".

LOL!!!
Post by Abbot
Post by Vicegerent
Ehrwen Watada
BY: Dahr Jamail
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/081406A.shtml
Date Published: 2006-08-14
On Saturday night, I was lucky enough to be at the Veterans for
Peace National Convention. For that night, Lt. Ehren Watada was
able to give the following speech, which I've just received permission
to post here. The speech was met with a powerful, standing ovation
from the vets who've been there.
Lt. Ehren Watada, for those who don't already know, became the first
commissioned officer to publicly refuse deployment to the unlawful
war and occupation in Iraq. While doing this on June 22, 2006, Watada
said, "As the order to take part in an illegal act is ultimately
unlawful as well, I must refuse that order."
Just as Watada took the stage and began to speak, over 50 members
of Iraq Veterans Against the War filed in behind him.
Watada, surprised by this and obviously taken aback by the symbolic
act, turned back to the audience, took some deep breaths,
Thank you everyone. Thank you all for your tremendous support.
How honored and delighted I am to be in the same room with you
tonight. I am deeply humbled by being in the company of such
wonderful speakers.
You are all true American patriots. Although long since out of
uniform, you continue to fight for the very same principles you
once swore to uphold and defend. No one knows the devastation
and suffering of war more than veterans - which is why we should
always be the first to prevent it.
I wasn't entirely sure what to say tonight. I thought as a leader in
general I should speak to motivate. Now I know that this isn't the
military and surely there are many out there who outranked me at
one point or another - and yes, I'm just a Lieutenant. And yet, I feel
as though we are all citizens of this great country and what I have to
say is not a matter of authority - but from one citizen to another.
We have all seen this war tear apart our country over the past three
years. It seems as though nothing we've done, from vigils to protests
to letters to Congress, have had any effect in persuading the powers
that be. Tonight I will speak to you on my ideas for a change of
strategy. I am here tonight because I took a leap of faith.
My action is not the first and it certainly will not be the last.
Yet, on behalf of those who follow, I require your help - your
sacrifice - and that of countless other Americans. I may fail.
We may fail. But nothing we have tried has worked so far.
It is time for change and the change starts with all of us.
I stand before you today, not as an expert - not as one who pretends
to have all the answers. I am simply an American and a servant of the
American people. My humble opinions today are just that. I realize
that you may not agree with everything I have to say. However, I did
not choose to be a leader for popularity. I did it to serve and make
better the soldiers of this country. And I swore to carry out this
charge honorably under the rule of law.
Today, I speak with you about a radical idea. It is one born from
the very concept of the American soldier (or service member).
It became instrumental in ending the Vietnam War - but it has
been long since forgotten. The idea is this: that to stop an illegal
and unjust war, the soldiers can choose to stop fighting it.
Now it is not an easy task for the soldier. For he or she must be
aware that they are being used for ill-gain. They must hold themselves
responsible for individual action. They must remember duty to the
Constitution and the people supersedes the ideologies of their
leadership. The soldier must be willing to face ostracism by their
peers, worry over the survival of their families, and of course the
loss of personal freedom.
They must know that resisting an authoritarian government at home
is equally important to fighting a foreign aggressor on the
battlefield. Finally, those wearing the uniform must know beyond
any shadow of a doubt that by refusing immoral and illegal orders
they will be supported by the people not with mere words but by
action.
The American soldier must rise above the socialization that tells
them authority should always be obeyed without question. Rank
should be respected but never blindly followed. Awareness o the
history of atrocities and destruction committed in the name of
America - either through direct military intervention or by proxy
war - is crucial.
They must realize that this is a war not out of self-defense but
by choice, for profit and imperialistic domination. WMD, ties
to Al Qaeda, and ties to 9/11 never existed and never will.
The soldier must know that our narrowly and questionably
elected officials intentionally manipulated the evidence
presented to Congress, the public, and the world to make
the case for war.
They must know that neither Congress nor this administration has
the authority to violate the prohibition against pre-emptive war - an
American law that still stands today. This same administration uses
us for rampant violations of time-tested laws banning torture and
degradation of prisoners of war.
Though the American soldier wants to do right, the illegitimacy of the
occupation itself, the policies of this administration, and rules of
engagement of desperate field commanders will ultimately force
them to be party to war crimes. They must know some of these facts,
if not all, in order to act.
Mark Twain once remarked, "Each man must for himself alone decide
what is right and what is wrong, which course is patriotic and which
isn't. You cannot shirk this and be a man. To decide against your
conviction is to be an unqualified and inexcusable traitor, both to
yourself and to your country ..." By this, each and every American
soldier, marine, airman, and sailor is responsible for their choices
and their actions. The freedom to choose is only one that we can
deny ourselves.
The oath we take swears allegiance not to one man but to a
document of principles and laws designed to protect the people.
Enlisting in the military does not relinquish one's right to seek
the truth - neither does it excuse one from rational thought nor
the ability to distinguish between right and wrong. "I was only
following orders" is never an excuse.
The Nuremburg Trials showed America and the world that citizenry as
well as soldiers have the unrelinquishable obligation to refuse
complicity in war crimes perpetrated by their government. Widespread
torture and inhumane treatment of detainees is a war crime. A war
of aggression born through an unofficial policy of prevention is a
crime against the peace. An occupation violating the very essence
of international humanitarian law and sovereignty is a crime against
humanity.
These crimes are funded by our tax dollars. Should citizens choose
to remain silent through self-imposed ignorance or choice, it makes
them as culpable as the soldier in these crimes.
The Constitution is no mere document - neither is it old,
out-dated, or irrelevant. It is the embodiment of all that
Americans hold dear: truth, justice, and equality for all.
It is the formula for a government of the people and by
the people. It is a government that is transparent
and accountable to whom they serve. It dictates a
system of checks and balances and separation of
powers to prevent the evil that is tyranny.
As strong as the Constitution is, it is not foolproof. It does
not fully take into account the frailty of human nature.
Profit, greed, and hunger for power can corrupt individuals
as much as they can corrupt institutions. The founders of
the Constitution could not have imagined how money would
infect our political system. Neither could they believe a
standing army would be used for profit and manifest destiny.
Like any common dictatorship, soldiers would be ordered
to commit acts of such heinous nature as to be deemed
most ungentlemanly and unbecoming that of a free country.
The American soldier is not a mercenary. He or she does
not simply fight wars for payment. Indeed, the state of the
American soldier is worse than that of a mercenary. For a
soldier-for-hire can walk away if they are disgusted by their
employer's actions. Instead, especially when it comes to
war, American soldiers become indentured servants whether
they volunteer out of patriotism or are drafted through economic
desperation.
Does it matter what the soldier believes is morally right? If this
is a war of necessity, why force men and women to fight?
When it comes to a war of ideology, the lines between right
and wrong are blurred. How tragic it is when the term Catch-22
defines the modern American military.
Aside from the reality of indentured servitude, the American
soldier in theory is much nobler. Soldier or officer, when we
swear our oath it is first and foremost to the Constitution and
its protectorate, the people. If soldiers realized this war is
contrary to what the Constitution extols - if they stood up
and threw their weapons down - no President could ever
initiate a war of choice again. When we say, "... Against
all enemies foreign and domestic," what if elected leaders
became the enemy? Whose orders do we follow? The
answer is the conscience that lies in each soldier, each
American, and each human being. Our duty to the Constitution
is an obligation, not a choice.
The military, and especially the Army, is an institution of
fraternity and close-knit camaraderie. Peer pressure exists
to ensure cohesiveness but it stamps out individualism and
individual thought. The idea of brotherhood is difficult to pull
away from if the alternative is loneliness and isolation. If we
want soldiers to choose the right but difficult path - they
must know beyond any shadow of a doubt that they will
be supported by Americans.
To support the troops who resist, you must make your voices
heard. If they see thousands supporting me, they will know.
I have heard your support, as has Suzanne Swift, and Ricky
Clousing - but many others have not. Increasingly, more
soldiers are questioning what they are being asked to do.
Yet, the majority lack awareness to the truth that is buried
beneath the headlines. Many more see no alternative but
to obey. We must show open-minded soldiers
a choice and we must give them courage to act.
Three weeks ago, Sgt. Hernandez from the 172nd Stryker Brigade
was killed, leaving behind a wife and two children. In an interview,
his wife said he sacrificed his life so that his family could survive.
I'm sure Sgt. Hernandez cherished the camaraderie of his brothers,
but given a choice, I doubt he would put himself in a position to
leave his family husbandless and fatherless. Yet that's the point,
you see. People like Sgt. Hernandez don't have a choice.
The choices are to fight in Iraq or let your family starve. Many
soldiers don't refuse this war en mass because, like all of us,,
they value their families over their own lives and perhaps their
conscience. Who would willingly spend years in prison for principle
and morality while denying their family sustenance?
I tell this to you because you must know that to stop this war, for
the soldiers to stop fighting it, they must have the unconditional
support of the people. I have seen this support with my own eyes.
For me it was a leap of faith. For other soldiers, they do not have
that luxury. They must know it and you must show it to them.
Convince them that no matter how long they sit in prison, no
matter how long this country takes to right itself, their families
will have a roof over their heads, food in their stomachs,
opportunities and education. This is a daunting task. It requires
the sacrifice of all of us.
Why must Canadians feed and house our fellow Americans who
have chosen to do the right thing? We should be the ones taking
care of our own. Are we that powerless - are we that unwilling to
risk something for those who can truly end this war? How do you
support the troops but not the war? By supporting those who can
truly stop it; let them know that resistance to participate in an
illegal war is not futile and not without a future.
I have broken no law but the code of silence and unquestioning
loyalty. If I am guilty of any crime, it is that I learned too much
and cared too deeply for the meaningless loss of my fellow
soldiers and my fellow human beings. If I am to be punished it
should be for following the rule of law over the immoral orders
of one man. If I am to be punished it should be for not acting
sooner. Martin Luther King Jr. once said, "History will have
to record that the greatest tragedy of this period
... was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but
the appalling silence of the good people."
Now, I'm not a hero. I am a leader of men who said enough is enough.
Those who called for war prior to the invasion compared diplomacy with
Saddam to the compromises made with Hitler. I say, we compromise
now by allowing a government that uses war as the first option instead
of the last to act with impunity. Many have said this about the World
Trade Towers, "Never Again." I agree. Never again will we allow those
who threaten our way of life to reign free - be they terrorists or
elected officials. The time to fight back is now - the time to stand
up and be counted is today.
One who breaks an unjust law that conscience tells him is unjust,
and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to
arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in
reality expressing the highest respect for law.
Thank you and bless you all.
The only thing Watada said that I would disagree with is that
he claimed that he is not a hero. He is a leader, yet again,
by taking this stance. And he may never know how many
lives he has already touched.
Today, it is up to the anti-war movement to make sure his
leadership touches as many soldiers' lives in Iraq as possible.
Watada is making his stand. He needs continued support.
As he said, if more American soldiers in Iraq know that they,
along with their families, will be supported if they stand up
against this illegal occupation, countless more will follow,
and this repulsive war will end.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dahr Jamail is an independent journalist who has reported
for the Guardian, the Independent, and the Sunday Herald.
He now writes regularly for Inter Press Service and Truthout.
He maintains a web site at dahrjamailiraq.com.
Posted by: Vicegerent
Abbot
2006-08-15 17:55:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by shrubkiller
Post by Abbot
Abbot) Wake up and smell the coffee, you psycho. Countless Americans
have vehemently opposed the war in Iraq for years now.
Oh?...and what concrete actions have they taken?
Abbot) Now let's see. . .who's the old poster who believes that asking
questions everyone with an above room temperature I.Q. knows the answer
to is a valid debate tool?
Post by shrubkiller
Some risking
Post by Abbot
careers and livelihoods to do so.
Like you?...........risking your job as a damage control goon to post
the odd comment about Bush...........but defending the ZIONIST'S
banking and tax system for all you are worth?
Abbot) Now let's see. . .who's the old poster who believes the straw
man logical fallacy is a valid debate tool?
Post by shrubkiller
Post by Abbot
Or are you just trying to take the heat off StaR?
If there's any "heat" on StaR it certainly wasn't applied by you
"Willkill".
Abbot) Now let's see. . .who's the old poster who believes the personal
attack is a valid debate tool?
Post by shrubkiller
LOL!!!
Abbot) Yeah, the laugh's on you old friend.
Post by shrubkiller
Post by Abbot
Post by Vicegerent
Ehrwen Watada
BY: Dahr Jamail
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/081406A.shtml
Date Published: 2006-08-14
On Saturday night, I was lucky enough to be at the Veterans for
Peace National Convention. For that night, Lt. Ehren Watada was
able to give the following speech, which I've just received permission
to post here. The speech was met with a powerful, standing ovation
from the vets who've been there.
Lt. Ehren Watada, for those who don't already know, became the first
commissioned officer to publicly refuse deployment to the unlawful
war and occupation in Iraq. While doing this on June 22, 2006, Watada
said, "As the order to take part in an illegal act is ultimately
unlawful as well, I must refuse that order."
Just as Watada took the stage and began to speak, over 50 members
of Iraq Veterans Against the War filed in behind him.
Watada, surprised by this and obviously taken aback by the symbolic
act, turned back to the audience, took some deep breaths,
Thank you everyone. Thank you all for your tremendous support.
How honored and delighted I am to be in the same room with you
tonight. I am deeply humbled by being in the company of such
wonderful speakers.
You are all true American patriots. Although long since out of
uniform, you continue to fight for the very same principles you
once swore to uphold and defend. No one knows the devastation
and suffering of war more than veterans - which is why we should
always be the first to prevent it.
I wasn't entirely sure what to say tonight. I thought as a leader in
general I should speak to motivate. Now I know that this isn't the
military and surely there are many out there who outranked me at
one point or another - and yes, I'm just a Lieutenant. And yet, I feel
as though we are all citizens of this great country and what I have to
say is not a matter of authority - but from one citizen to another.
We have all seen this war tear apart our country over the past three
years. It seems as though nothing we've done, from vigils to protests
to letters to Congress, have had any effect in persuading the powers
that be. Tonight I will speak to you on my ideas for a change of
strategy. I am here tonight because I took a leap of faith.
My action is not the first and it certainly will not be the last.
Yet, on behalf of those who follow, I require your help - your
sacrifice - and that of countless other Americans. I may fail.
We may fail. But nothing we have tried has worked so far.
It is time for change and the change starts with all of us.
I stand before you today, not as an expert - not as one who pretends
to have all the answers. I am simply an American and a servant of the
American people. My humble opinions today are just that. I realize
that you may not agree with everything I have to say. However, I did
not choose to be a leader for popularity. I did it to serve and make
better the soldiers of this country. And I swore to carry out this
charge honorably under the rule of law.
Today, I speak with you about a radical idea. It is one born from
the very concept of the American soldier (or service member).
It became instrumental in ending the Vietnam War - but it has
been long since forgotten. The idea is this: that to stop an illegal
and unjust war, the soldiers can choose to stop fighting it.
Now it is not an easy task for the soldier. For he or she must be
aware that they are being used for ill-gain. They must hold themselves
responsible for individual action. They must remember duty to the
Constitution and the people supersedes the ideologies of their
leadership. The soldier must be willing to face ostracism by their
peers, worry over the survival of their families, and of course the
loss of personal freedom.
They must know that resisting an authoritarian government at home
is equally important to fighting a foreign aggressor on the
battlefield. Finally, those wearing the uniform must know beyond
any shadow of a doubt that by refusing immoral and illegal orders
they will be supported by the people not with mere words but by
action.
The American soldier must rise above the socialization that tells
them authority should always be obeyed without question. Rank
should be respected but never blindly followed. Awareness o the
history of atrocities and destruction committed in the name of
America - either through direct military intervention or by proxy
war - is crucial.
They must realize that this is a war not out of self-defense but
by choice, for profit and imperialistic domination. WMD, ties
to Al Qaeda, and ties to 9/11 never existed and never will.
The soldier must know that our narrowly and questionably
elected officials intentionally manipulated the evidence
presented to Congress, the public, and the world to make
the case for war.
They must know that neither Congress nor this administration has
the authority to violate the prohibition against pre-emptive war - an
American law that still stands today. This same administration uses
us for rampant violations of time-tested laws banning torture and
degradation of prisoners of war.
Though the American soldier wants to do right, the illegitimacy of the
occupation itself, the policies of this administration, and rules of
engagement of desperate field commanders will ultimately force
them to be party to war crimes. They must know some of these facts,
if not all, in order to act.
Mark Twain once remarked, "Each man must for himself alone decide
what is right and what is wrong, which course is patriotic and which
isn't. You cannot shirk this and be a man. To decide against your
conviction is to be an unqualified and inexcusable traitor, both to
yourself and to your country ..." By this, each and every American
soldier, marine, airman, and sailor is responsible for their choices
and their actions. The freedom to choose is only one that we can
deny ourselves.
The oath we take swears allegiance not to one man but to a
document of principles and laws designed to protect the people.
Enlisting in the military does not relinquish one's right to seek
the truth - neither does it excuse one from rational thought nor
the ability to distinguish between right and wrong. "I was only
following orders" is never an excuse.
The Nuremburg Trials showed America and the world that citizenry as
well as soldiers have the unrelinquishable obligation to refuse
complicity in war crimes perpetrated by their government. Widespread
torture and inhumane treatment of detainees is a war crime. A war
of aggression born through an unofficial policy of prevention is a
crime against the peace. An occupation violating the very essence
of international humanitarian law and sovereignty is a crime against
humanity.
These crimes are funded by our tax dollars. Should citizens choose
to remain silent through self-imposed ignorance or choice, it makes
them as culpable as the soldier in these crimes.
The Constitution is no mere document - neither is it old,
out-dated, or irrelevant. It is the embodiment of all that
Americans hold dear: truth, justice, and equality for all.
It is the formula for a government of the people and by
the people. It is a government that is transparent
and accountable to whom they serve. It dictates a
system of checks and balances and separation of
powers to prevent the evil that is tyranny.
As strong as the Constitution is, it is not foolproof. It does
not fully take into account the frailty of human nature.
Profit, greed, and hunger for power can corrupt individuals
as much as they can corrupt institutions. The founders of
the Constitution could not have imagined how money would
infect our political system. Neither could they believe a
standing army would be used for profit and manifest destiny.
Like any common dictatorship, soldiers would be ordered
to commit acts of such heinous nature as to be deemed
most ungentlemanly and unbecoming that of a free country.
The American soldier is not a mercenary. He or she does
not simply fight wars for payment. Indeed, the state of the
American soldier is worse than that of a mercenary. For a
soldier-for-hire can walk away if they are disgusted by their
employer's actions. Instead, especially when it comes to
war, American soldiers become indentured servants whether
they volunteer out of patriotism or are drafted through economic
desperation.
Does it matter what the soldier believes is morally right? If this
is a war of necessity, why force men and women to fight?
When it comes to a war of ideology, the lines between right
and wrong are blurred. How tragic it is when the term Catch-22
defines the modern American military.
Aside from the reality of indentured servitude, the American
soldier in theory is much nobler. Soldier or officer, when we
swear our oath it is first and foremost to the Constitution and
its protectorate, the people. If soldiers realized this war is
contrary to what the Constitution extols - if they stood up
and threw their weapons down - no President could ever
initiate a war of choice again. When we say, "... Against
all enemies foreign and domestic," what if elected leaders
became the enemy? Whose orders do we follow? The
answer is the conscience that lies in each soldier, each
American, and each human being. Our duty to the Constitution
is an obligation, not a choice.
The military, and especially the Army, is an institution of
fraternity and close-knit camaraderie. Peer pressure exists
to ensure cohesiveness but it stamps out individualism and
individual thought. The idea of brotherhood is difficult to pull
away from if the alternative is loneliness and isolation. If we
want soldiers to choose the right but difficult path - they
must know beyond any shadow of a doubt that they will
be supported by Americans.
To support the troops who resist, you must make your voices
heard. If they see thousands supporting me, they will know.
I have heard your support, as has Suzanne Swift, and Ricky
Clousing - but many others have not. Increasingly, more
soldiers are questioning what they are being asked to do.
Yet, the majority lack awareness to the truth that is buried
beneath the headlines. Many more see no alternative but
to obey. We must show open-minded soldiers
a choice and we must give them courage to act.
Three weeks ago, Sgt. Hernandez from the 172nd Stryker Brigade
was killed, leaving behind a wife and two children. In an interview,
his wife said he sacrificed his life so that his family could survive.
I'm sure Sgt. Hernandez cherished the camaraderie of his brothers,
but given a choice, I doubt he would put himself in a position to
leave his family husbandless and fatherless. Yet that's the point,
you see. People like Sgt. Hernandez don't have a choice.
The choices are to fight in Iraq or let your family starve. Many
soldiers don't refuse this war en mass because, like all of us,,
they value their families over their own lives and perhaps their
conscience. Who would willingly spend years in prison for principle
and morality while denying their family sustenance?
I tell this to you because you must know that to stop this war, for
the soldiers to stop fighting it, they must have the unconditional
support of the people. I have seen this support with my own eyes.
For me it was a leap of faith. For other soldiers, they do not have
that luxury. They must know it and you must show it to them.
Convince them that no matter how long they sit in prison, no
matter how long this country takes to right itself, their families
will have a roof over their heads, food in their stomachs,
opportunities and education. This is a daunting task. It requires
the sacrifice of all of us.
Why must Canadians feed and house our fellow Americans who
have chosen to do the right thing? We should be the ones taking
care of our own. Are we that powerless - are we that unwilling to
risk something for those who can truly end this war? How do you
support the troops but not the war? By supporting those who can
truly stop it; let them know that resistance to participate in an
illegal war is not futile and not without a future.
I have broken no law but the code of silence and unquestioning
loyalty. If I am guilty of any crime, it is that I learned too much
and cared too deeply for the meaningless loss of my fellow
soldiers and my fellow human beings. If I am to be punished it
should be for following the rule of law over the immoral orders
of one man. If I am to be punished it should be for not acting
sooner. Martin Luther King Jr. once said, "History will have
to record that the greatest tragedy of this period
... was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but
the appalling silence of the good people."
Now, I'm not a hero. I am a leader of men who said enough is enough.
Those who called for war prior to the invasion compared diplomacy with
Saddam to the compromises made with Hitler. I say, we compromise
now by allowing a government that uses war as the first option instead
of the last to act with impunity. Many have said this about the World
Trade Towers, "Never Again." I agree. Never again will we allow those
who threaten our way of life to reign free - be they terrorists or
elected officials. The time to fight back is now - the time to stand
up and be counted is today.
One who breaks an unjust law that conscience tells him is unjust,
and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to
arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in
reality expressing the highest respect for law.
Thank you and bless you all.
The only thing Watada said that I would disagree with is that
he claimed that he is not a hero. He is a leader, yet again,
by taking this stance. And he may never know how many
lives he has already touched.
Today, it is up to the anti-war movement to make sure his
leadership touches as many soldiers' lives in Iraq as possible.
Watada is making his stand. He needs continued support.
As he said, if more American soldiers in Iraq know that they,
along with their families, will be supported if they stand up
against this illegal occupation, countless more will follow,
and this repulsive war will end.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dahr Jamail is an independent journalist who has reported
for the Guardian, the Independent, and the Sunday Herald.
He now writes regularly for Inter Press Service and Truthout.
He maintains a web site at dahrjamailiraq.com.
Posted by: Vicegerent
Nobody
2006-08-15 20:15:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Abbot
Post by shrubkiller
Post by Abbot
Abbot) Wake up and smell the coffee, you psycho. Countless
Americans have vehemently opposed the war in Iraq for years
now.
Oh?...and what concrete actions have they taken?
Abbot) Now let's see. . .who's the old poster who believes that
asking questions everyone with an above room temperature I.Q.
knows the answer to is a valid debate tool?
Post by shrubkiller
Some risking
Post by Abbot
careers and livelihoods to do so.
Like you?...........risking your job as a damage control goon to
post the odd comment about Bush...........but defending the
ZIONIST'S banking and tax system for all you are worth?
Abbot) Now let's see. . .who's the old poster who believes the
straw man logical fallacy is a valid debate tool?
Post by shrubkiller
Post by Abbot
Or are you just trying to take the heat off StaR?
If there's any "heat" on StaR it certainly wasn't applied by you
"Willkill".
Abbot) Now let's see. . .who's the old poster who believes the
personal attack is a valid debate tool?
Post by shrubkiller
LOL!!!
Abbot) Yeah, the laugh's on you old friend.
shrubkiller is just ONE of this kooks handles. He aslo uses :
bcpg
shrubkiller
rudy-canoza
banmilk
bunghole-jonnie

Usually he shows his stupidity in can.politics. He is a true
dumbass, not a detaxer like Eldon and the rest.
Abbot
2006-08-15 20:33:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nobody
Post by Abbot
Post by shrubkiller
Post by Abbot
Abbot) Wake up and smell the coffee, you psycho. Countless
Americans have vehemently opposed the war in Iraq for years
now.
Oh?...and what concrete actions have they taken?
Abbot) Now let's see. . .who's the old poster who believes that
asking questions everyone with an above room temperature I.Q.
knows the answer to is a valid debate tool?
Post by shrubkiller
Some risking
Post by Abbot
careers and livelihoods to do so.
Like you?...........risking your job as a damage control goon to
post the odd comment about Bush...........but defending the
ZIONIST'S banking and tax system for all you are worth?
Abbot) Now let's see. . .who's the old poster who believes the
straw man logical fallacy is a valid debate tool?
Post by shrubkiller
Post by Abbot
Or are you just trying to take the heat off StaR?
If there's any "heat" on StaR it certainly wasn't applied by you
"Willkill".
Abbot) Now let's see. . .who's the old poster who believes the
personal attack is a valid debate tool?
Post by shrubkiller
LOL!!!
Abbot) Yeah, the laugh's on you old friend.
bcpg
shrubkiller
rudy-canoza
banmilk
bunghole-jonnie
Usually he shows his stupidity in can.politics. He is a true
dumbass, not a detaxer like Eldon and the rest.
Abbot) "banmilk" is one of Ron's (or MoRon, as we call him) old
handles. His off the point questions have always been suggestive of
adult ADHD.
l***@rogers.com
2006-08-15 21:03:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Abbot
Abbot) "banmilk" is one of Ron's (or MoRon, as we call him) old
handles. His off the point questions have always been suggestive of
adult ADHD.
and what is your excuse???
Nobody
2006-08-16 01:45:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Abbot
Post by Nobody
Post by Abbot
Abbot) Yeah, the laugh's on you old friend.
bcpg
shrubkiller
rudy-canoza
banmilk
bunghole-jonnie
Usually he shows his stupidity in can.politics. He is a true
dumbass, not a detaxer like Eldon and the rest.
Abbot) "banmilk" is one of Ron's (or MoRon, as we call him) old
handles. His off the point questions have always been suggestive of
adult ADHD.
Well, shrubkiller et al certainly is a MoRon. I haven't checked the IP
addresses though.
l***@gmail.com
2006-08-15 17:29:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Vicegerent
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/081406A.shtml
Never a truth in a page
Post by Vicegerent
Lt. Ehren Watada, for those who don't already know, became the first
commissioned officer to publicly refuse deployment to the unlawful
war and occupation in Iraq. While doing this on June 22, 2006, Watada
said, "As the order to take part in an illegal act is ultimately
unlawful as well, I must refuse that order."
The coward had bad advice - his orders and the war
were both legal.

He should bed careful where he steps, or better still
get out of town - to Siberia, maybe
Dale Eastman
2006-08-15 20:09:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by l***@gmail.com
Post by Vicegerent
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/081406A.shtml
Never a truth in a page
Post by Vicegerent
Lt. Ehren Watada, for those who don't already know, became the first
commissioned officer to publicly refuse deployment to the unlawful
war and occupation in Iraq. While doing this on June 22, 2006, Watada
said, "As the order to take part in an illegal act is ultimately
unlawful as well, I must refuse that order."
The coward had bad advice - his orders and the war
were both legal.
Uh, when did Congress declare this war?

When did Congress declare any war since the declarations of war that
entered the U.S. into WWII?
Post by l***@gmail.com
He should bed careful where he steps, or better still
get out of town - to Siberia, maybe
--
Anybody answering this post consents to having their replies posted on
my website.
(Not that I need your consent since you post to public domain.)
Vicegerent
2006-08-15 21:14:49 UTC
Permalink
Ehrwen Watada
BY: Dahr Jamail
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/081406A.shtml
Date Published: 2006-08-14

On Saturday night, I was lucky enough to be
at the Veterans for Peace National Convention.
For that night, Lt. Ehren Watada was able to
give the following speech, which I've just
received permission to post here. The speech
was met with a powerful, standing ovation
from the vets who've been there.

Lt. Ehren Watada, for those who don't already
know, became the first commissioned officer
to publicly refuse deployment to the unlawful
war and occupation in Iraq. While doing this
on June 22, 2006, Watada said, "As the order
to take part in an illegal act is ultimately
unlawful as well, I must refuse that order."

Just as Watada took the stage and began to
speak, over 50 members of Iraq Veterans
Against the War filed in behind him.

Watada, surprised by this and obviously taken
aback by the symbolic act, turned back to the
audience, took some deep breaths, then gave
this speech:

Thank you everyone. Thank you all for your
tremendous support. How honored and delighted
I am to be in the same room with you tonight.
I am deeply humbled by being in the company
of such wonderful speakers.

You are all true American patriots. Although
long since out of uniform, you continue to fight
for the very same principles you once swore to
uphold and defend. No one knows the devastation
and suffering of war more than veterans - which
is why we should always be the first to prevent it.

I wasn't entirely sure what to say tonight.
I thought as a leader in general I should
speak to motivate. Now I know that this
isn't the military and surely there are many
out there who outranked me at one point
or another - and yes, I'm just a Lieutenant.
And yet, I feel as though we are all citizens
of this great country and what I have to say
is not a matter of authority - but from one
citizen to another.

We have all seen this war tear apart our
country over the past three years. It seems
as though nothing we've done, from vigils
to protests to letters to Congress, have
had any effect in persuading the powers
that be. Tonight I will speak to you on my
ideas for a change of strategy.
I am here tonight because I took a leap of faith.

My action is not the first and it certainly
will not be the last. Yet, on behalf of those
who follow, I require your help - your sacrifice
- and that of countless other Americans.
I may fail. We may fail. But nothing we
have tried has worked so far. It is time for
change and the change starts with all of us.

I stand before you today, not as an expert -
not as one who pretends to have all the answers.
I am simply an American and a servant of the
American people. My humble opinions today
are just that. I realize that you may not agree
with everything I have to say. However, I did
not choose to be a leader for popularity. I did
it to serve and make better the soldiers of this
country. And I swore to carry out this charge
honorably under the rule of law.

Today, I speak with you about a radical idea.
It is one born from the very concept of the
American soldier (or service member).
It became instrumental in ending the Vietnam
War - but it has been long since forgotten.
The idea is this: that to stop an illegal and
unjust war, the soldiers can choose to stop
fighting it.

Now it is not an easy task for the soldier.
For he or she must be aware that they are
being used for ill-gain. They must hold
themselves responsible for individual action.
They must remember duty to the Constitution
and the people supersedes the ideologies
of their leadership. The soldier must be willing
to face ostracism by their peers, worry over
the survival of their families, and of course
the loss of personal freedom.

They must know that resisting an authoritarian
government at home is equally important to
fighting a foreign aggressor on the battlefield.
Finally, those wearing the uniform must know
beyond any shadow of a doubt that by refusing
immoral and illegal orders they will be supported
by the people not with mere words but by action.

The American soldier must rise above the
socialization that tells them authority should
always be obeyed without question. Rank
should be respected but never blindly followed.
Awareness of the history of atrocities and
destruction committed in the name of
America - either through direct military
intervention or by proxy war - is crucial.

They must realize that this is a war not out of
self-defense but by choice, for profit and
imperialistic domination. WMD, ties to Al Qaeda,
and ties to 9/11 never existed and never will.
The soldier must know that our narrowly and
questionably elected officials intentionally
manipulated the evidence presented to
Congress, the public, and the world to
make the case for war.

They must know that neither Congress nor this
administration has the authority to violate the
prohibition against pre-emptive war - an American
law that still stands today. This same
administration uses us for rampant violations
of time-tested laws banning torture and
degradation of prisoners of war.

Though the American soldier wants to do right,
the illegitimacy of the occupation itself, the
policies of this administration, and rules of
engagement of desperate field commanders
will ultimately force them to be party to war
crimes. They must know some of these
facts, if not all, in order to act.

Mark Twain once remarked, "Each man must
for himself alone decide what is right and what
is wrong, which course is patriotic and which
isn't. You cannot shirk this and be a man. To
decide against your conviction is to be an
unqualified and inexcusable traitor, both to
yourself and to your country ..." By this, each
and every American soldier, marine, airman,
and sailor is responsible for their choices and
their actions. The freedom to choose is only
one that we can deny ourselves.

The oath we take swears allegiance not to
one man but to a document of principles and
laws designed to protect the people. Enlisting
in the military does not relinquish one's right to
seek the truth - neither does it excuse one
from rational thought nor the ability to
distinguish between right and wrong.
"I was only following orders" is never an excuse.

The Nuremburg Trials showed America and
the world that citizenry as well as soldiers have
the unrelinquishable obligation to refuse
complicity in war crimes perpetrated by their
government. Widespread torture and inhumane
treatment of detainees is a war crime. A war
of aggression born through an unofficial policy
of prevention is a crime against the peace.
An occupation violating the very essence of
international humanitarian law and sovereignty
is a crime against humanity.

These crimes are funded by our tax dollars.
Should citizens choose to remain silent through
self-imposed ignorance or choice, it makes
them as culpable as the soldier in these crimes.

The Constitution is no mere document - neither
is it old, out-dated, or irrelevant. It is the
embodiment of all that Americans hold dear: truth,
justice, and equality for all. It is the formula for
a government of the people and by the people.
It is a government that is transparent and
accountable to whom they serve. It dictates a
system of checks and balances and separation
of powers to prevent the evil that is tyranny.

As strong as the Constitution is, it is not foolproof.
It does not fully take into account the frailty of
human nature. Profit, greed, and hunger for power
can corrupt individuals as much as they can corrupt
institutions. The founders of the Constitution could
not have imagined how money would infect our
political system. Neither could they believe a
standing army would be used for profit and manifest
destiny. Like any common dictatorship, soldiers
would be ordered to commit acts of such heinous
nature as to be deemed most ungentlemanly and
unbecoming that of a free country.

The American soldier is not a mercenary. He or
she does not simply fight wars for payment. Indeed,
the state of the American soldier is worse than that
of a mercenary. For a soldier-for-hire can walk away
if they are disgusted by their employer's actions.
Instead, especially when it comes to war, American
soldiers become indentured servants whether
they volunteer out of patriotism or are drafted
through economic desperation.

Does it matter what the soldier believes is morally
right? If this is a war of necessity, why force men
and women to fight? When it comes to a war of
ideology, the lines between right and wrong are
blurred. How tragic it is when the term Catch-22
defines the modern American military.

Aside from the reality of indentured servitude,
the American soldier in theory is much nobler.
Soldier or officer, when we swear our oath it is
first and foremost to the Constitution and
its protectorate, the people. If soldiers realized
this war is contrary to what the Constitution extols
- if they stood up and threw their weapons down -
no President could ever initiate a war of choice
again. When we say, "... Against all enemies
foreign and domestic," what if elected leaders
became the enemy? Whose orders do we follow?
The answer is the conscience that lies in each
soldier, each American, and each human being.
Our duty to the Constitution is an obligation,
not a choice.

The military, and especially the Army, is an
institution of fraternity and close-knit camaraderie.
Peer pressure exists to ensure cohesiveness
but it stamps out individualism and individual
thought. The idea of brotherhood is difficult to
pull away from if the alternative is loneliness
and isolation. If we want soldiers to choose
the right but difficult path - they must know
beyond any shadow of a doubt that they will
be supported by Americans.

To support the troops who resist, you must
make your voices heard. If they see thousands
supporting me, they will know. I have heard
your support, as has Suzanne Swift, and Ricky
Clousing - but many others have not. Increasingly,
more soldiers are questioning what they are
being asked to do.

Yet, the majority lack awareness to the truth
that is buried beneath the headlines. Many more
see no alternative but to obey. We must show
open-minded soldiers a choice and we must
give them courage to act.

Three weeks ago, Sgt. Hernandez from the
172nd Stryker Brigade was killed, leaving behind
a wife and two children. In an interview, his wife
said he sacrificed his life so that his family could
survive. I'm sure Sgt. Hernandez cherished the
camaraderie of his brothers, but given a choice,
I doubt he would put himself in a position to
leave his family husbandless and fatherless.
Yet that's the point, you see. People like
Sgt. Hernandez don't have a choice.

The choices are to fight in Iraq or let your
family starve. Many soldiers don't refuse this
war en mass because, like all of us,, they value
their families over their own lives and perhaps
their conscience. Who would willingly spend
years in prison for principle and morality while
denying their family sustenance?

I tell this to you because you must know that
to stop this war, for the soldiers to stop fighting
it, they must have the unconditional support of
the people. I have seen this support with my
own eyes.

For me it was a leap of faith. For other soldiers,
they do not have that luxury. They must know it
and you must show it to them. Convince them
that no matter how long they sit in prison, no
matter how long this country takes to right
itself, their families will have a roof over their
heads, food in their stomachs, opportunities
and education. This is a daunting task. It requires
the sacrifice of all of us.

Why must Canadians feed and house our
fellow Americans who have chosen to do the
right thing? We should be the ones taking
care of our own. Are we that powerless -
are we that unwilling to risk something for
those who can truly end this war? How do
you support the troops but not the war? By
supporting those who can truly stop it; let
them know that resistance to participate in
an illegal war is not futile and not without
a future.

I have broken no law but the code of silence
and unquestioning loyalty. If I am guilty of any
crime, it is that I learned too much and cared
too deeply for the meaningless loss of my
fellow soldiers and my fellow human beings.

If I am to be punished it should be for following
the rule of law over the immoral orders of one
man. If I am to be punished it should be for not
acting sooner. Martin Luther King Jr. once said,
"History will have to record that the greatest
tragedy of this period ... was not the strident
clamor of the bad people, but the appalling
silence of the good people."

Now, I'm not a hero. I am a leader of men
who said enough is enough. Those who called
for war prior to the invasion compared diplomacy
with Saddam to the compromises made with
Hitler. I say, we compromise now by allowing
a government that uses war as the first option
instead of the last to act with impunity. Many
have said this about the World Trade Towers,
"Never Again." I agree. Never again will we
allow those who threaten our way of life to reign
free - be they terrorists or elected officials.
The time to fight back is now - the time to stand
up and be counted is today.

I'll end with one more Martin Luther King Jr. quote:

One who breaks an unjust law that conscience
tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts
the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse
the conscience of the community over its injustice,
is in reality expressing the highest respect for law.

Thank you and bless you all.

The only thing Watada said that I would disagree
with is that he claimed that he is not a hero. He
is a leader, yet again, by taking this stance.
And he may never know how many lives he
has already touched.

Today, it is up to the anti-war movement to
make sure his leadership touches as many
soldiers' lives in Iraq as possible. Watada is
making his stand. He needs continued support.

As he said, if more American soldiers in Iraq
know that they, along with their families, will
be supported if they stand up against this
illegal occupation, countless more will follow,
and this repulsive war will end.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dahr Jamail is an independent journalist
who has reported for the Guardian, the
Independent, and the Sunday Herald.
He now writes regularly for Inter Press
Service and Truthout. He maintains a
web site at dahrjamailiraq.com.

Posted by: Vicegerent
l***@rogers.com
2006-08-16 19:14:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by l***@gmail.com
Post by Vicegerent
Lt. Ehren Watada, for those who don't already know, became the first
commissioned officer to publicly refuse deployment to the unlawful
war and occupation in Iraq.
The coward had bad advice - his orders and the war
were both legal.
He should bed careful where he steps, or better still
get out of town - to Siberia, maybe <G>
I wonder how much Soros is paying Watada to tour the
country making his silly speeches
Vicegerent
2006-08-17 05:37:27 UTC
Permalink
I wonder how much coke GW Bush is supplying you
with to have you post such imbicillic statements?

Vicege5ent
Post by l***@rogers.com
Post by l***@gmail.com
Post by Vicegerent
Lt. Ehren Watada, for those who don't already know, became the first
commissioned officer to publicly refuse deployment to the unlawful
war and occupation in Iraq.
The coward had bad advice - his orders and the war
were both legal.
He should bed careful where he steps, or better still
get out of town - to Siberia, maybe <G>
I wonder how much Soros is paying Watada to tour the
country making his silly speeches
sharx35
2006-10-06 05:37:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Vicegerent
Ehrwen Watada
BY: Dahr Jamail
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/081406A.shtml
Date Published: 2006-08-14
On Saturday night, I was lucky enough to be at the Veterans for
Peace National Convention. For that night, Lt. Ehren Watada was
able to give the following speech, which I've just received permission
to post here. The speech was met with a powerful, standing ovation
from the vets who've been there.
Lt. Ehren Watada, for those who don't already know, became the first
commissioned officer to publicly refuse deployment to the unlawful
war and occupation in Iraq. While doing this on June 22, 2006, Watada
said, "As the order to take part in an illegal act is ultimately
unlawful as well, I must refuse that order."
Just as Watada took the stage and began to speak, over 50 members
of Iraq Veterans Against the War filed in behind him.
Watada, surprised by this and obviously taken aback by the symbolic
act, turned back to the audience, took some deep breaths,
Thank you everyone. Thank you all for your tremendous support.
How honored and delighted I am to be in the same room with you
tonight. I am deeply humbled by being in the company of such
wonderful speakers.
You are all true American patriots. Although long since out of
uniform, you continue to fight for the very same principles you
once swore to uphold and defend. No one knows the devastation
and suffering of war more than veterans - which is why we should
always be the first to prevent it.
I wasn't entirely sure what to say tonight. I thought as a leader in
general I should speak to motivate. Now I know that this isn't the
military and surely there are many out there who outranked me at
one point or another - and yes, I'm just a Lieutenant. And yet, I feel
as though we are all citizens of this great country and what I have to
say is not a matter of authority - but from one citizen to another.
We have all seen this war tear apart our country over the past three
years. It seems as though nothing we've done, from vigils to protests
to letters to Congress, have had any effect in persuading the powers
that be. Tonight I will speak to you on my ideas for a change of
strategy. I am here tonight because I took a leap of faith.
My action is not the first and it certainly will not be the last.
Yet, on behalf of those who follow, I require your help - your
sacrifice - and that of countless other Americans. I may fail.
We may fail. But nothing we have tried has worked so far.
It is time for change and the change starts with all of us.
I stand before you today, not as an expert - not as one who pretends
to have all the answers. I am simply an American and a servant of the
American people. My humble opinions today are just that. I realize
that you may not agree with everything I have to say. However, I did
not choose to be a leader for popularity. I did it to serve and make
better the soldiers of this country. And I swore to carry out this
charge honorably under the rule of law.
Today, I speak with you about a radical idea. It is one born from
the very concept of the American soldier (or service member).
It became instrumental in ending the Vietnam War - but it has
been long since forgotten. The idea is this: that to stop an illegal
and unjust war, the soldiers can choose to stop fighting it.
Now it is not an easy task for the soldier. For he or she must be
aware that they are being used for ill-gain. They must hold themselves
responsible for individual action. They must remember duty to the
Constitution and the people supersedes the ideologies of their
leadership. The soldier must be willing to face ostracism by their
peers, worry over the survival of their families, and of course the
loss of personal freedom.
They must know that resisting an authoritarian government at home
is equally important to fighting a foreign aggressor on the
battlefield. Finally, those wearing the uniform must know beyond
any shadow of a doubt that by refusing immoral and illegal orders
they will be supported by the people not with mere words but by
action.
The American soldier must rise above the socialization that tells
them authority should always be obeyed without question. Rank
should be respected but never blindly followed. Awareness o the
history of atrocities and destruction committed in the name of
America - either through direct military intervention or by proxy
war - is crucial.
They must realize that this is a war not out of self-defense but
by choice, for profit and imperialistic domination. WMD, ties
to Al Qaeda, and ties to 9/11 never existed and never will.
The soldier must know that our narrowly and questionably
elected officials intentionally manipulated the evidence
presented to Congress, the public, and the world to make
the case for war.
They must know that neither Congress nor this administration has
the authority to violate the prohibition against pre-emptive war - an
American law that still stands today. This same administration uses
us for rampant violations of time-tested laws banning torture and
degradation of prisoners of war.
Though the American soldier wants to do right, the illegitimacy of the
occupation itself, the policies of this administration, and rules of
engagement of desperate field commanders will ultimately force
them to be party to war crimes. They must know some of these facts,
if not all, in order to act.
Mark Twain once remarked, "Each man must for himself alone decide
what is right and what is wrong, which course is patriotic and which
isn't. You cannot shirk this and be a man. To decide against your
conviction is to be an unqualified and inexcusable traitor, both to
yourself and to your country ..." By this, each and every American
soldier, marine, airman, and sailor is responsible for their choices
and their actions. The freedom to choose is only one that we can
deny ourselves.
The oath we take swears allegiance not to one man but to a
document of principles and laws designed to protect the people.
Enlisting in the military does not relinquish one's right to seek
the truth - neither does it excuse one from rational thought nor
the ability to distinguish between right and wrong. "I was only
following orders" is never an excuse.
The Nuremburg Trials showed America and the world that citizenry as
well as soldiers have the unrelinquishable obligation to refuse
complicity in war crimes perpetrated by their government. Widespread
torture and inhumane treatment of detainees is a war crime. A war
of aggression born through an unofficial policy of prevention is a
crime against the peace. An occupation violating the very essence
of international humanitarian law and sovereignty is a crime against
humanity.
These crimes are funded by our tax dollars. Should citizens choose
to remain silent through self-imposed ignorance or choice, it makes
them as culpable as the soldier in these crimes.
The Constitution is no mere document - neither is it old,
out-dated, or irrelevant. It is the embodiment of all that
Americans hold dear: truth, justice, and equality for all.
It is the formula for a government of the people and by
the people. It is a government that is transparent
and accountable to whom they serve. It dictates a
system of checks and balances and separation of
powers to prevent the evil that is tyranny.
As strong as the Constitution is, it is not foolproof. It does
not fully take into account the frailty of human nature.
Profit, greed, and hunger for power can corrupt individuals
as much as they can corrupt institutions. The founders of
the Constitution could not have imagined how money would
infect our political system. Neither could they believe a
standing army would be used for profit and manifest destiny.
Like any common dictatorship, soldiers would be ordered
to commit acts of such heinous nature as to be deemed
most ungentlemanly and unbecoming that of a free country.
The American soldier is not a mercenary. He or she does
not simply fight wars for payment. Indeed, the state of the
American soldier is worse than that of a mercenary. For a
soldier-for-hire can walk away if they are disgusted by their
employer's actions. Instead, especially when it comes to
war, American soldiers become indentured servants whether
they volunteer out of patriotism or are drafted through economic
desperation.
Does it matter what the soldier believes is morally right? If this
is a war of necessity, why force men and women to fight?
When it comes to a war of ideology, the lines between right
and wrong are blurred. How tragic it is when the term Catch-22
defines the modern American military.
Aside from the reality of indentured servitude, the American
soldier in theory is much nobler. Soldier or officer, when we
swear our oath it is first and foremost to the Constitution and
its protectorate, the people. If soldiers realized this war is
contrary to what the Constitution extols - if they stood up
and threw their weapons down - no President could ever
initiate a war of choice again. When we say, "... Against
all enemies foreign and domestic," what if elected leaders
became the enemy? Whose orders do we follow? The
answer is the conscience that lies in each soldier, each
American, and each human being. Our duty to the Constitution
is an obligation, not a choice.
The military, and especially the Army, is an institution of
fraternity and close-knit camaraderie. Peer pressure exists
to ensure cohesiveness but it stamps out individualism and
individual thought. The idea of brotherhood is difficult to pull
away from if the alternative is loneliness and isolation. If we
want soldiers to choose the right but difficult path - they
must know beyond any shadow of a doubt that they will
be supported by Americans.
To support the troops who resist, you must make your voices
heard. If they see thousands supporting me, they will know.
I have heard your support, as has Suzanne Swift, and Ricky
Clousing - but many others have not. Increasingly, more
soldiers are questioning what they are being asked to do.
Yet, the majority lack awareness to the truth that is buried
beneath the headlines. Many more see no alternative but
to obey. We must show open-minded soldiers
a choice and we must give them courage to act.
Three weeks ago, Sgt. Hernandez from the 172nd Stryker Brigade
was killed, leaving behind a wife and two children. In an interview,
his wife said he sacrificed his life so that his family could survive.
I'm sure Sgt. Hernandez cherished the camaraderie of his brothers,
but given a choice, I doubt he would put himself in a position to
leave his family husbandless and fatherless. Yet that's the point,
you see. People like Sgt. Hernandez don't have a choice.
The choices are to fight in Iraq or let your family starve. Many
soldiers don't refuse this war en mass because, like all of us,,
they value their families over their own lives and perhaps their
conscience. Who would willingly spend years in prison for principle
and morality while denying their family sustenance?
I tell this to you because you must know that to stop this war, for
the soldiers to stop fighting it, they must have the unconditional
support of the people. I have seen this support with my own eyes.
For me it was a leap of faith. For other soldiers, they do not have
that luxury. They must know it and you must show it to them.
Convince them that no matter how long they sit in prison, no
matter how long this country takes to right itself, their families
will have a roof over their heads, food in their stomachs,
opportunities and education. This is a daunting task. It requires
the sacrifice of all of us.
Why must Canadians feed and house our fellow Americans who
have chosen to do the right thing? We should be the ones taking
care of our own. Are we that powerless - are we that unwilling to
risk something for those who can truly end this war? How do you
support the troops but not the war? By supporting those who can
truly stop it; let them know that resistance to participate in an
illegal war is not futile and not without a future.
I have broken no law but the code of silence and unquestioning
loyalty. If I am guilty of any crime, it is that I learned too much
and cared too deeply for the meaningless loss of my fellow
soldiers and my fellow human beings. If I am to be punished it
should be for following the rule of law over the immoral orders
of one man. If I am to be punished it should be for not acting
sooner. Martin Luther King Jr. once said, "History will have
to record that the greatest tragedy of this period
... was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but
the appalling silence of the good people."
Now, I'm not a hero. I am a leader of men who said enough is enough.
Those who called for war prior to the invasion compared diplomacy with
Saddam to the compromises made with Hitler. I say, we compromise
now by allowing a government that uses war as the first option instead
of the last to act with impunity. Many have said this about the World
Trade Towers, "Never Again." I agree. Never again will we allow those
who threaten our way of life to reign free - be they terrorists or
elected officials. The time to fight back is now - the time to stand
up and be counted is today.
One who breaks an unjust law that conscience tells him is unjust,
and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to
arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in
reality expressing the highest respect for law.
Thank you and bless you all.
The only thing Watada said that I would disagree with is that
he claimed that he is not a hero. He is a leader, yet again,
by taking this stance. And he may never know how many
lives he has already touched.
Today, it is up to the anti-war movement to make sure his
leadership touches as many soldiers' lives in Iraq as possible.
Watada is making his stand. He needs continued support.
As he said, if more American soldiers in Iraq know that they,
along with their families, will be supported if they stand up
against this illegal occupation, countless more will follow,
and this repulsive war will end.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dahr Jamail is an independent journalist who has reported
for the Guardian, the Independent, and the Sunday Herald.
He now writes regularly for Inter Press Service and Truthout.
He maintains a web site at dahrjamailiraq.com.
Posted by: Vicegerent
Loading...