Discussion:
Move to Seize Supreme Court House For Hotel
(too old to reply)
Antimulticulture
2005-06-29 11:02:56 UTC
Permalink
Move to Seize Supreme Court House For Hotel
http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html
June 28, 2005

Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by
Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court
which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A
private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on
Souter's land.

Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows
city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another
if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic
benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.

On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the
code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to
start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This
is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.

Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will
certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34
Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.

The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the
"Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a
permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's
Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas
Shrugged."

Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of
land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely
responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.

"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on
the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent
domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel
development."

Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty
investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to
raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular
customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice
and participants in the Free State Project among others.

--
Jim
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Western_Nationalist/
Union Against Multi-Culty

"Abolish Multi-Culty and String Up The Traitors!"
Perfesser White
2005-06-29 11:18:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Antimulticulture
Move to Seize Supreme Court House For Hotel
http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html
June 28, 2005
Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by
Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court
which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A
private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on
Souter's land.
Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows
city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another
if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic
benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.
On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the
code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to
start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This
is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.
Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will
certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34
Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.
The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the
"Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a
permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's
Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas
Shrugged."
Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of
land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely
responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.
"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on
the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent
domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel
development."
Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty
investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to
raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular
customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice
and participants in the Free State Project among others.
--
Jim
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Western_Nationalist/
Union Against Multi-Culty
"Abolish Multi-Culty and String Up The Traitors!"
This really is too good to be true. It is an excellent idea, though.

Perfesser White

_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
GeekBoy
2005-06-29 22:45:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Perfesser White
Post by Antimulticulture
Move to Seize Supreme Court House For Hotel
http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html
June 28, 2005
Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by
Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court
which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A
private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on
Souter's land.
Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows
city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another
if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic
benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.
On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the
code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to
start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This
is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.
Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will
certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34
Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.
The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the
"Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a
permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's
Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas
Shrugged."
Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of
land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely
responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.
"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on
the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent
domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel
development."
Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty
investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to
raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular
customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice
and participants in the Free State Project among others.
--
Jim
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Western_Nationalist/
Union Against Multi-Culty
"Abolish Multi-Culty and String Up The Traitors!"
This really is too good to be true. It is an excellent idea, though.
Perfesser White
No tonly excellent, but I am sure he won't need any investors. Just do a
google search and see and the people pissed off.

He could easily get donations to do this.
Post by Perfesser White
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source
<><><><><><><><>
e***@netpath.net
2005-06-29 14:01:21 UTC
Permalink
We ALL should become developers - and propose to Scaife or the John M.
Olin Foundation investments in new strip malls and hotels to be built
on eminent-domain-looted land taken from every federal judge and all
liberal congresscritters!

No $4 to park! No $6 admission!
http://stores.ebay.com/INTERNET-GUN-SHOW
Lets Roll
2005-06-29 16:38:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Antimulticulture
Move to Seize Supreme Court House For Hotel
http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html
June 28, 2005
Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by
Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court
which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A
private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on
Souter's land.
Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows
city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another
if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic
benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.
On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the
code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to
start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This
is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.
Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will
certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34
Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.
The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the
"Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a
permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's
Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas
Shrugged."
Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of
land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely
responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.
"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on
the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent
domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel
development."
Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty
investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to
raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular
customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice
and participants in the Free State Project among others.
--
Jim
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Western_Nationalist/
Union Against Multi-Culty
"Abolish Multi-Culty and String Up The Traitors!"
BWHAHAHAHA!!! I love it!!!
You know, the Crawford Ranch could fall under eminent domain. It would be a
lot more profitable and would generate more revenue and jobs if a detention
center for illegal aliens was built on it.
Graphic Queen
2005-06-29 18:34:35 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:38:23 GMT, "Lets Roll"
Post by Lets Roll
Post by Antimulticulture
Move to Seize Supreme Court House For Hotel
http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html
June 28, 2005
Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by
Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court
which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A
private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on
Souter's land.
Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows
city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another
if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic
benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.
On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the
code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to
start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This
is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.
Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will
certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34
Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.
The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the
"Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a
permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's
Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas
Shrugged."
Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of
land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely
responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.
"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on
the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent
domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel
development."
Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty
investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to
raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular
customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice
and participants in the Free State Project among others.
--
Jim
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Western_Nationalist/
Union Against Multi-Culty
"Abolish Multi-Culty and String Up The Traitors!"
BWHAHAHAHA!!! I love it!!!
You know, the Crawford Ranch could fall under eminent domain. It would be a
lot more profitable and would generate more revenue and jobs if a detention
center for illegal aliens was built on it.
I love it. Let's start movement. LOLOLOL
Zerge
2005-06-30 18:18:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Antimulticulture
Move to Seize Supreme Court House For Hotel
http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html
June 28, 2005
Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by
Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court
which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A
private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on
Souter's land.
Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows
city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another
if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic
benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.
On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the
code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to
start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This
is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.
Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will
certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34
Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.
The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the
"Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a
permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's
Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas
Shrugged."
Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of
land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely
responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.
"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on
the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent
domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel
development."
Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty
investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to
raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular
customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice
and participants in the Free State Project among others.
--
Jim
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Western_Nationalist/
Union Against Multi-Culty
"Abolish Multi-Culty and String Up The Traitors!"
This eminent domain shit is UNBELIEVABLE. This kind of crap could not
happen in Mexico. People would take the streets in a flash. Why don't
you do the same?
A few years back the Mexican government wanted to take some land in
Texcoco to build the new airport. The land owners, farmers all, fought
back and paralized Mexico City with marches. The government backed off.
Graphic Queen
2005-06-30 18:31:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Zerge
Post by Antimulticulture
Move to Seize Supreme Court House For Hotel
http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html
June 28, 2005
Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by
Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court
which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A
private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on
Souter's land.
Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows
city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another
if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic
benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.
On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the
code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to
start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This
is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.
Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will
certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34
Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.
The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the
"Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a
permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's
Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas
Shrugged."
Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of
land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely
responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.
"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on
the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent
domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel
development."
Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty
investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to
raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular
customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice
and participants in the Free State Project among others.
--
Jim
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Western_Nationalist/
Union Against Multi-Culty
"Abolish Multi-Culty and String Up The Traitors!"
This eminent domain shit is UNBELIEVABLE. This kind of crap could not
happen in Mexico. People would take the streets in a flash. Why don't
you do the same?
Because most Americans are brainwashed and stupid.
Post by Zerge
A few years back the Mexican government wanted to take some land in
Texcoco to build the new airport. The land owners, farmers all, fought
back and paralized Mexico City with marches. The government backed off.
Juan
2005-06-30 19:30:01 UTC
Permalink
Graphic Cunt whines:

<< Because most Americans are brainwashed and stupid. >>

Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahha!! Now she doesn't like "most Americans."
This racist terroristic old woman really needs to pack up and leave
this country!
Zerge
2005-06-30 20:24:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Graphic Queen
Post by Zerge
Post by Antimulticulture
Move to Seize Supreme Court House For Hotel
http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html
June 28, 2005
Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by
Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court
which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A
private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on
Souter's land.
Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows
city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another
if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic
benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.
On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the
code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to
start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This
is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.
Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will
certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34
Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.
The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the
"Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a
permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's
Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas
Shrugged."
Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of
land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely
responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.
"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on
the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent
domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel
development."
Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty
investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to
raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular
customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice
and participants in the Free State Project among others.
--
Jim
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Western_Nationalist/
Union Against Multi-Culty
"Abolish Multi-Culty and String Up The Traitors!"
This eminent domain shit is UNBELIEVABLE. This kind of crap could not
happen in Mexico. People would take the streets in a flash. Why don't
you do the same?
Because most Americans are brainwashed and stupid.
Oh, that's too bad. Well, you should've seen was a spectacle it was.
The farmers rode on horseback into Mexico City brandishing machetes. It
was like a scene from the 1910 Revolution. I mean, it was just for
show, but it worked and Fox had to chicken out :)
http://www.envio.org.ni/articulo/1599
Graphic Queen
2005-06-30 22:18:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Zerge
Post by Graphic Queen
Post by Zerge
Post by Antimulticulture
Move to Seize Supreme Court House For Hotel
http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html
June 28, 2005
Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by
Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court
which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A
private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on
Souter's land.
Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows
city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another
if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic
benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.
On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the
code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to
start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This
is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.
Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will
certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34
Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.
The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the
"Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a
permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's
Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas
Shrugged."
Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of
land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely
responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.
"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on
the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent
domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel
development."
Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty
investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to
raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular
customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice
and participants in the Free State Project among others.
--
Jim
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Western_Nationalist/
Union Against Multi-Culty
"Abolish Multi-Culty and String Up The Traitors!"
This eminent domain shit is UNBELIEVABLE. This kind of crap could not
happen in Mexico. People would take the streets in a flash. Why don't
you do the same?
Because most Americans are brainwashed and stupid.
Oh, that's too bad. Well, you should've seen was a spectacle it was.
The farmers rode on horseback into Mexico City brandishing machetes. It
was like a scene from the 1910 Revolution. I mean, it was just for
show, but it worked and Fox had to chicken out :)
http://www.envio.org.ni/articulo/1599
Good for them. Why in the hell don't the other Mexicans do something
to help the rural assholes before they make criminals of themselves by
coming to this country illegally? Seems that they aren't much
different than Americans in that they don't care about anything if it
doesn't touch them.
Zerge
2005-07-01 22:56:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Graphic Queen
Post by Zerge
Post by Graphic Queen
Post by Zerge
Post by Antimulticulture
Move to Seize Supreme Court House For Hotel
http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html
June 28, 2005
Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by
Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court
which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A
private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on
Souter's land.
Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows
city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another
if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic
benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.
On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the
code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to
start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This
is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.
Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will
certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34
Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.
The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the
"Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a
permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's
Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas
Shrugged."
Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of
land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely
responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.
"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on
the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent
domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel
development."
Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty
investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to
raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular
customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice
and participants in the Free State Project among others.
--
Jim
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Western_Nationalist/
Union Against Multi-Culty
"Abolish Multi-Culty and String Up The Traitors!"
This eminent domain shit is UNBELIEVABLE. This kind of crap could not
happen in Mexico. People would take the streets in a flash. Why don't
you do the same?
Because most Americans are brainwashed and stupid.
Oh, that's too bad. Well, you should've seen was a spectacle it was.
The farmers rode on horseback into Mexico City brandishing machetes. It
was like a scene from the 1910 Revolution. I mean, it was just for
show, but it worked and Fox had to chicken out :)
http://www.envio.org.ni/articulo/1599
Good for them. Why in the hell don't the other Mexicans do something
to help the rural assholes before they make criminals of themselves by
coming to this country illegally? Seems that they aren't much
different than Americans in that they don't care about anything if it
doesn't touch them.
Not true. A lot is done. What you should grasp is the HUGE dimension of
it. We are figthing enormous socioeconomic forces here. Rural Mexico is
breaking up slowly and painfully. We can try to mitigate the effects of
the process as much as we can try to mitigate the effects of a
hurricane.

Lets Roll
2005-06-30 20:48:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Antimulticulture
Move to Seize Supreme Court House For Hotel
http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html
June 28, 2005
Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by
Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court
which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A
private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on
Souter's land.
Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows
city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another
if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic
benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.
On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the
code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to
start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This
is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.
Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will
certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34
Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.
The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the
"Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a
permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's
Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas
Shrugged."
Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of
land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely
responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.
"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on
the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent
domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel
development."
Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty
investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to
raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular
customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice
and participants in the Free State Project among others.
--
Jim
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Western_Nationalist/
Union Against Multi-Culty
"Abolish Multi-Culty and String Up The Traitors!"
This eminent domain shit is UNBELIEVABLE. This kind of crap could not
happen in Mexico. People would take the streets in a flash. Why don't
you do the same?
A few years back the Mexican government wanted to take some land in
Texcoco to build the new airport. The land owners, farmers all, fought
back and paralized Mexico City with marches. The government backed off.


The vast majority of Americans are completely oblivious to the shenanigans
our treasonous aristocracy have been up to. The average American doesn't
notice anything until it bites them on the ass. The ones that ARE paying
the most attention are the ones selling the country down the river. To get
the average Americans' attention on something it has to be in a Superbowl
commercial.
Loading...