Traffic Ticket Racketeering

[Vicegerent]

SEVERINO and SIMON cases (USA). Briefly:
(Cites wil be posted when received)

SEVERINO was driving drunk. THIS TIME, a cop made
a mistake, he MIRANDIZED Severino; who was not
too drunk to 'lawyer up'. They convicted him anyway.

The attorney general then had to explain why traffic
offenders are neither Mirandized nor Indicted.
"No Miranda warnings need be given since this is
a civil (breach of fictitious contract) matter."

Also, Simon tried to raise the ALL CAPS defense.
Miraculously, the jury foreman picked up the issue,
demanding to be informed of how the State acquired
IN REM jurisdiction of the motor vehicle, and
IN PERSONEM jurisdiction over the driver.

The fascist stooge on the bench bumbled. Translation:

In rem jurisdiction of the motor vehicle is based upon
a PRESUMPTION that the 'State is vested with
Title' to all property in the venue.

In personem jurisdiction of the driver is based upon
a FICTITIOUS enlistment, employment (persons
employ tools), or slavery contract.
(All three represent 'fictitious' contracts of
servitude)
* * * * * * * * * * * *

There you have it. The cop stops you for some
motor vehicle infraction - no victim. You are
'presumed' to be using State or Provincial
property. The fiction name on the State or
Provinically owned driver's license you carry
is 'presumed' to be a 'person' (fictional status)
attached to you which is under a contract
of servitude. You are considered to be a
'disobedient slave' without right to enter evidence
on your own behalf. The 'certificate' of an officer
is sufficient for conviction.

See Fugitive Slave Act 1850 (US) Section 6,
last part:
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/fugitive.htm
Yes it is American, but it is a statement of
Roman law, the system of false law also
used in Canada on dealing with 'disobedient
slaves'.

And, yes, it is acknowledged that the original 14th
Amendment that overwrote the original 13th
Amendment of the US CON-stitution, eliminated
'involuntary servitude'; however people are tricked
into 'volunteering to be slaves', by their use of the
State or Crown owned Birth Certificate name.

Vicegerent

[Abbot]

Post by Vicegerent
(Cites wil be posted when received)

Abbot) I am not holding my breath.

Post by Vicegerent
SEVERINO was driving drunk. THIS TIME, a cop made
a mistake, he MIRANDIZED Severino; who was not
too drunk to 'lawyer up'. They convicted him anyway.
The attorney general then had to explain why traffic
offenders are neither Mirandized nor Indicted.
"No Miranda warnings need be given since this is
a civil (breach of fictitious contract) matter."
Also, Simon tried to raise the ALL CAPS defense.
Miraculously, the jury foreman picked up the issue,
demanding to be informed of how the State acquired
IN REM jurisdiction of the motor vehicle, and
IN PERSONEM jurisdiction over the driver.

Abbot) Jury foemen don't make law.
Abbot) Eldon, you are not qualified to speak for the judge.

Post by Vicegerent
In rem jurisdiction of the motor vehicle is based upon
a PRESUMPTION that the 'State is vested with
Title' to all property in the venue.
In personem jurisdiction of the driver is based upon
a FICTITIOUS enlistment, employment (persons
employ tools), or slavery contract.
(All three represent 'fictitious' contracts of
servitude)
* * * * * * * * * * * *

Abbot) That's absolute bull sh*t, you crazy old fart. The state has
jurisdiction over the public highways by virtue of its state
constitution. And Servino was busted not because he was a slave, but
because he was operating the auto in an unsafe condition.

Post by Vicegerent
There you have it. The cop stops you for some
motor vehicle infraction - no victim. You are
'presumed' to be using State or Provincial
property. The fiction name on the State or
Provinically owned driver's license you carry
is 'presumed' to be a 'person' (fictional status)
attached to you which is under a contract
of servitude. You are considered to be a
'disobedient slave' without right to enter evidence
on your own behalf. The 'certificate' of an officer
is sufficient for conviction.

Abbot) Then how was it the court convicted you over a traffic stop
turned violent (you punched the cop) when you refused to show ID? And
since you have since said you didn't have a license why didn't you
skate at the scene?

Post by Vicegerent
See Fugitive Slave Act 1850 (US) Section 6,
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/fugitive.htm
Yes it is American, but it is a statement of
Roman law, the system of false law also
used in Canada on dealing with 'disobedient
slaves'.

Abbot) That's just plain crazy. The Fugitive Slave Act was repealed in
1867

Post by Vicegerent
And, yes, it is acknowledged that the original 14th
Amendment that overwrote the original 13th
Amendment

Abbot) You finally got it, Eldon? Or just saw your argument wasn't
selling with the rubes?

Post by Vicegerent
of the US CON-stitution, eliminated
'involuntary servitude'; however people are tricked
into 'volunteering to be slaves', by their use of the
State or Crown owned Birth Certificate name.
Vicegerent

[Vicegerent]

SEVERINO and SIMON cases (USA). Briefly:
(Cites wil be posted when received)

SEVERINO was driving drunk. THIS TIME, a cop made
a mistake, he MIRANDIZED Severino; who was not
too drunk to 'lawyer up'. They convicted him anyway.

The attorney general then had to explain why traffic
offenders are neither Mirandized nor Indicted.
"No Miranda warnings need be given since this is
a civil (breach of fictitious contract) matter."

Also, Simon tried to raise the ALL CAPS defense.
Miraculously, the jury foreman picked up the issue,
demanding to be informed of how the State acquired
IN REM jurisdiction of the motor vehicle, and
IN PERSONEM jurisdiction over the driver.

The fascist stooge on the bench bumbled. Translation:

In rem jurisdiction of the motor vehicle is based upon
a PRESUMPTION that the 'State is vested with
Title' to all property in the venue.

In personem jurisdiction of the driver is based upon
a FICTITIOUS enlistment, employment (persons
employ tools), or slavery contract.
(All three represent 'fictitious' contracts of
servitude)
* * * * * * * * * * * *

There you have it. The cop stops you for some
motor vehicle infraction - no victim. You are
'presumed' to be using State or Provincial
property. The fiction name on the State or
Provinically owned driver's license you carry
is 'presumed' to be a 'person' (fictional status)
attached to you which is under a contract
of servitude. You are considered to be a
'disobedient slave' without right to enter evidence
on your own behalf. The 'certificate' of an officer
is sufficient for conviction.

See Fugitive Slave Act 1850 (US) Section 6,
last part:
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/fugitive.htm
Yes it is American, but it is a statement of
Roman law, the system of false law also
used in Canada on dealing with 'disobedient
slaves'.

And, yes, it is acknowledged that the original 14th
Amendment that overwrote the original 13th
Amendment of the US CON-stitution, eliminated
'involuntary servitude'; however people are tricked
into 'volunteering to be slaves', by their use of the
State or Crown owned Birth Certificate name.

Vicegerent

[Abbot]

Abbot) If you have seen "Million Dollar Baby"
(http://www.modernhometheater.com/movies/revs/milliondollarbaby.shtml)
then it will ring a bell (no pun intended) when I tell you that Eldon
and his pathetic 20 plus year history of detax failure reminds me of
"Danger Barch" the film's Forest Gump-like character who hangs around
the gym and despite having zero fighting skills is tolerated by Frankie
Dunn (Clint Eastwood), only to be harassed by the less forgiving
fighters training there.

Early in the film the stick like Danger Barch (mimicking the delusional
"Fugitive Slave Act" Eldon Warman" announces his intention of
taking on Thomas 'Hit Man" Herns, unaware that Herns retired years
ago.

Post by Vicegerent
(Cites wil be posted when received)
SEVERINO was driving drunk. THIS TIME, a cop made
a mistake, he MIRANDIZED Severino; who was not
too drunk to 'lawyer up'. They convicted him anyway.
The attorney general then had to explain why traffic
offenders are neither Mirandized nor Indicted.
"No Miranda warnings need be given since this is
a civil (breach of fictitious contract) matter."
Also, Simon tried to raise the ALL CAPS defense.
Miraculously, the jury foreman picked up the issue,
demanding to be informed of how the State acquired
IN REM jurisdiction of the motor vehicle, and
IN PERSONEM jurisdiction over the driver.
In rem jurisdiction of the motor vehicle is based upon
a PRESUMPTION that the 'State is vested with
Title' to all property in the venue.
In personem jurisdiction of the driver is based upon
a FICTITIOUS enlistment, employment (persons
employ tools), or slavery contract.
(All three represent 'fictitious' contracts of
servitude)
* * * * * * * * * * * *
There you have it. The cop stops you for some
motor vehicle infraction - no victim. You are
'presumed' to be using State or Provincial
property. The fiction name on the State or
Provinically owned driver's license you carry
is 'presumed' to be a 'person' (fictional status)
attached to you which is under a contract
of servitude. You are considered to be a
'disobedient slave' without right to enter evidence
on your own behalf. The 'certificate' of an officer
is sufficient for conviction.
See Fugitive Slave Act 1850 (US) Section 6,
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/fugitive.htm
Yes it is American, but it is a statement of
Roman law, the system of false law also
used in Canada on dealing with 'disobedient
slaves'.
And, yes, it is acknowledged that the original 14th
Amendment that overwrote the original 13th
Amendment of the US CON-stitution, eliminated
'involuntary servitude'; however people are tricked
into 'volunteering to be slaves', by their use of the
State or Crown owned Birth Certificate name.
Vicegerent

[Abbot]

Abbot) If you have seen "Million Dollar Baby"
(http://www.modernhometheater.com/movies/revs/milliondollarbaby.shtml)
then it will ring a bell (no pun intended) when I tell you that Eldon
and his pathetic 20 plus year history of detax failure reminds me of
"Danger Barch" the film's Forest Gump-like character who hangs around
the gym and despite having zero fighting skills is tolerated by Frankie
Dunn (Clint Eastwood), only to be harassed by the less forgiving
fighters training there.

Early in the film the stick like Danger Barch (mimicking the delusional
"Fugitive Slave Act" Eldon Warman) announces his intention of taking on
Thomas 'Hit Man" Herns, unaware that Herns retired years ago.

LOL!!!

Post by Vicegerent
(Cites wil be posted when received)
SEVERINO was driving drunk. THIS TIME, a cop made
a mistake, he MIRANDIZED Severino; who was not
too drunk to 'lawyer up'. They convicted him anyway.
The attorney general then had to explain why traffic
offenders are neither Mirandized nor Indicted.
"No Miranda warnings need be given since this is
a civil (breach of fictitious contract) matter."
Also, Simon tried to raise the ALL CAPS defense.
Miraculously, the jury foreman picked up the issue,
demanding to be informed of how the State acquired
IN REM jurisdiction of the motor vehicle, and
IN PERSONEM jurisdiction over the driver.
In rem jurisdiction of the motor vehicle is based upon
a PRESUMPTION that the 'State is vested with
Title' to all property in the venue.
In personem jurisdiction of the driver is based upon
a FICTITIOUS enlistment, employment (persons
employ tools), or slavery contract.
(All three represent 'fictitious' contracts of
servitude)
* * * * * * * * * * * *
There you have it. The cop stops you for some
motor vehicle infraction - no victim. You are
'presumed' to be using State or Provincial
property. The fiction name on the State or
Provinically owned driver's license you carry
is 'presumed' to be a 'person' (fictional status)
attached to you which is under a contract
of servitude. You are considered to be a
'disobedient slave' without right to enter evidence
on your own behalf. The 'certificate' of an officer
is sufficient for conviction.
See Fugitive Slave Act 1850 (US) Section 6,
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/fugitive.htm
Yes it is American, but it is a statement of
Roman law, the system of false law also
used in Canada on dealing with 'disobedient
slaves'.
And, yes, it is acknowledged that the original 14th
Amendment that overwrote the original 13th
Amendment of the US CON-stitution, eliminated
'involuntary servitude'; however people are tricked
into 'volunteering to be slaves', by their use of the
State or Crown owned Birth Certificate name.
Vicegerent

[Vicegerent]

SEVERINO and SIMON cases (USA). Briefly:
(Cites wil be posted when received)

SEVERINO was driving drunk. THIS TIME, a cop made
a mistake, he MIRANDIZED Severino; who was not
too drunk to 'lawyer up'. They convicted him anyway.

The attorney general then had to explain why traffic
offenders are neither Mirandized nor Indicted.
"No Miranda warnings need be given since this is
a civil (breach of fictitious contract) matter."

Also, Simon tried to raise the ALL CAPS defense.
Miraculously, the jury foreman picked up the issue,
demanding to be informed of how the State acquired
IN REM jurisdiction of the motor vehicle, and
IN PERSONEM jurisdiction over the driver.

The fascist stooge on the bench bumbled. Translation:

In rem jurisdiction of the motor vehicle is based upon
a PRESUMPTION that the 'State is vested with
Title' to all property in the venue.

In personem jurisdiction of the driver is based upon
a FICTITIOUS enlistment, employment (persons
employ tools), or slavery contract.
(All three represent 'fictitious' contracts of
servitude)
* * * * * * * * * * * *

There you have it. The cop stops you for some
motor vehicle infraction - no victim. You are
'presumed' to be using State or Provincial
property. The fiction name on the State or
Provinically owned driver's license you carry
is 'presumed' to be a 'person' (fictional status)
attached to you which is under a contract
of servitude. You are considered to be a
'disobedient slave' without right to enter evidence
on your own behalf. The 'certificate' of an officer
is sufficient for conviction.

See Fugitive Slave Act 1850 (US) Section 6,
last part:
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/fugitive.htm
Yes it is American, but it is a statement of
Roman law, the system of false law also
used in Canada on dealing with 'disobedient
slaves'.

And, yes, it is acknowledged that the original 14th
Amendment that overwrote the original 13th
Amendment of the US CON-stitution, eliminated
'involuntary servitude'; however people are tricked
into 'volunteering to be slaves', by their use of the
State or Crown owned Birth Certificate name.

Vicegerent

[Nobody]

Post by Vicegerent
(Cites wil be posted when received)

I don't believe you will post any proof ever.

What's going on Eldon? Has you detax thing finally come to an end for
the year and now you need a new 'project'? This case is as full of
shit as your detax method. Please try again when you have something
concrete.

You are going to mess up Jimmy with this new scheme. Do you provide
him with the required training? He MAY not be able to be as stupid
about this as your other schemes without better training.

This has nothing to do with the Fugitive Slave act. The fellow never
volunteered to be a slave. He volunteered to be a drunk and go to
jail. You know how that works, don't you Eldon?

[Jimmy_For_Freedom]

Post by Nobody

Post by Vicegerent
(Cites wil be posted when received)

I don't believe you will post any proof ever.
What's going on Eldon? Has you detax thing finally come to an end for
the year and now you need a new 'project'? This case is as full of
shit as your detax method. Please try again when you have something
concrete.
You are going to mess up Jimmy with this new scheme. Do you provide
him with the required training? He MAY not be able to be as stupid
about this as your other schemes without better training.
This has nothing to do with the Fugitive Slave act. The fellow never
volunteered to be a slave. He volunteered to be a drunk and go to
jail. You know how that works, don't you Eldon?

Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.

Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.

You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

[Abbot]

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Nobody

Post by Vicegerent
(Cites wil be posted when received)

I don't believe you will post any proof ever.
What's going on Eldon? Has you detax thing finally come to an end for
the year and now you need a new 'project'? This case is as full of
shit as your detax method. Please try again when you have something
concrete.
You are going to mess up Jimmy with this new scheme. Do you provide
him with the required training? He MAY not be able to be as stupid
about this as your other schemes without better training.
This has nothing to do with the Fugitive Slave act. The fellow never
volunteered to be a slave. He volunteered to be a drunk and go to
jail. You know how that works, don't you Eldon?

Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Ah, yes yet another highly improbable and undocumented tale of
success from Jimmy, the mindless detax propagandist. I'd ask for some
proof these events actually happened but it would only result in
another of Jimmy's weeklong denial sessions.

It is ironic to point out that the same fool who figured it was okay to
handle a .22 while smashed out of his mind figured writing some
detax/sovereign citizen jibber jabber would exempt him from the law.

[Jimmy_For_Freedom]

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Nobody

Post by Vicegerent
(Cites wil be posted when received)

I don't believe you will post any proof ever.
What's going on Eldon? Has you detax thing finally come to an end for
the year and now you need a new 'project'? This case is as full of
shit as your detax method. Please try again when you have something
concrete.
You are going to mess up Jimmy with this new scheme. Do you provide
him with the required training? He MAY not be able to be as stupid
about this as your other schemes without better training.
This has nothing to do with the Fugitive Slave act. The fellow never
volunteered to be a slave. He volunteered to be a drunk and go to
jail. You know how that works, don't you Eldon?

Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Ah, yes yet another highly improbable and undocumented tale of
success from Jimmy, the mindless detax propagandist. I'd ask for some
proof these events actually happened but it would only result in
another of Jimmy's weeklong denial sessions.
It is ironic to point out that the same fool who figured it was okay to
handle a .22 while smashed out of his mind figured writing some
detax/sovereign citizen jibber jabber would exempt him from the law.

I'd give you his name and phone number except you'd probably twist what
he'd tell you into some kind of victory for the creators of the
strawman.

[Abbot]

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Nobody

Post by Vicegerent
(Cites wil be posted when received)

I don't believe you will post any proof ever.
What's going on Eldon? Has you detax thing finally come to an end for
the year and now you need a new 'project'? This case is as full of
shit as your detax method. Please try again when you have something
concrete.
You are going to mess up Jimmy with this new scheme. Do you provide
him with the required training? He MAY not be able to be as stupid
about this as your other schemes without better training.
This has nothing to do with the Fugitive Slave act. The fellow never
volunteered to be a slave. He volunteered to be a drunk and go to
jail. You know how that works, don't you Eldon?

Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Ah, yes yet another highly improbable and undocumented tale of
success from Jimmy, the mindless detax propagandist. I'd ask for some
proof these events actually happened but it would only result in
another of Jimmy's weeklong denial sessions.
It is ironic to point out that the same fool who figured it was okay to
handle a .22 while smashed out of his mind figured writing some
detax/sovereign citizen jibber jabber would exempt him from the law.

I'd give you his name and phone number except you'd probably twist what
he'd tell you into some kind of victory for the creators of the
strawman.

Abbot 2) Your pointless and pathetic cover-up is not worth the effort
of a real response. On this point you need jabber no more, Jimmy. You
just aren't believable.

It seems you detax boys don't care any more about the rules of gun
safety (check the chamber when you pick up a firearm and don't handle
one when you are drunk) then you care about the rules of a civilized
society (pay your taxes, don't drive drunk and don't punch traffic
cops).

What you fail to realize, you moron, is that your story only makes you
detax/sovereign citizen fools look more idiotic. . . .and you the same
for repeating it.

[Abbot]

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Nobody

Post by Vicegerent
(Cites wil be posted when received)

I don't believe you will post any proof ever.
What's going on Eldon? Has you detax thing finally come to an end for
the year and now you need a new 'project'? This case is as full of
shit as your detax method. Please try again when you have something
concrete.
You are going to mess up Jimmy with this new scheme. Do you provide
him with the required training? He MAY not be able to be as stupid
about this as your other schemes without better training.
This has nothing to do with the Fugitive Slave act. The fellow never
volunteered to be a slave. He volunteered to be a drunk and go to
jail. You know how that works, don't you Eldon?

Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Ah, yes yet another highly improbable and undocumented tale of
success from Jimmy, the mindless detax propagandist. I'd ask for some
proof these events actually happened but it would only result in
another of Jimmy's weeklong denial sessions.
It is ironic to point out that the same fool who figured it was okay to
handle a .22 while smashed out of his mind figured writing some
detax/sovereign citizen jibber jabber would exempt him from the law.

I'd give you his name and phone number except you'd probably twist what
he'd tell you into some kind of victory for the creators of the
strawman.

Abbot 2) Your pointless and pathetic cover-up is not worth the effort
of a real response. On this point you need jabber no more, Jimmy. You
just aren't believable.

It seems you detax boys don't care any more about the rules of gun
safety (check the chamber when you pick up a firearm and don't handle
one when you are drunk) then you care about the rules of a civilized
society (pay your taxes, don't drive drunk and don't punch traffic
cops).

What you fail to realize, you moron, is that your story only makes you
detax/sovereign citizen fools look more idiotic. . . .and you the same
for repeating it.

[Jimmy_For_Freedom]

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Nobody

Post by Vicegerent
(Cites wil be posted when received)

I don't believe you will post any proof ever.
What's going on Eldon? Has you detax thing finally come to an end for
the year and now you need a new 'project'? This case is as full of
shit as your detax method. Please try again when you have something
concrete.
You are going to mess up Jimmy with this new scheme. Do you provide
him with the required training? He MAY not be able to be as stupid
about this as your other schemes without better training.
This has nothing to do with the Fugitive Slave act. The fellow never
volunteered to be a slave. He volunteered to be a drunk and go to
jail. You know how that works, don't you Eldon?

Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Ah, yes yet another highly improbable and undocumented tale of
success from Jimmy, the mindless detax propagandist. I'd ask for some
proof these events actually happened but it would only result in
another of Jimmy's weeklong denial sessions.
It is ironic to point out that the same fool who figured it was okay to
handle a .22 while smashed out of his mind figured writing some
detax/sovereign citizen jibber jabber would exempt him from the law.

I'd give you his name and phone number except you'd probably twist what
he'd tell you into some kind of victory for the creators of the
strawman.

Abbot 2) Your pointless and pathetic cover-up is not worth the effort
of a real response. On this point you need jabber no more, Jimmy. You
just aren't believable.
It seems you detax boys don't care any more about the rules of gun
safety (check the chamber when you pick up a firearm and don't handle
one when you are drunk) then you care about the rules of a civilized
society (pay your taxes, don't drive drunk and don't punch traffic
cops).
What you fail to realize, you moron, is that your story only makes you
detax/sovereign citizen fools look more idiotic. . . .and you the same
for repeating it.

Your insidous demands for "proof" are simply a continuation of your
"bad jokes". Or is this a court of common law?

[Abbot]

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Nobody

Post by Vicegerent
(Cites wil be posted when received)

I don't believe you will post any proof ever.
What's going on Eldon? Has you detax thing finally come to an end for
the year and now you need a new 'project'? This case is as full of
shit as your detax method. Please try again when you have something
concrete.
You are going to mess up Jimmy with this new scheme. Do you provide
him with the required training? He MAY not be able to be as stupid
about this as your other schemes without better training.
This has nothing to do with the Fugitive Slave act. The fellow never
volunteered to be a slave. He volunteered to be a drunk and go to
jail. You know how that works, don't you Eldon?

Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Ah, yes yet another highly improbable and undocumented tale of
success from Jimmy, the mindless detax propagandist. I'd ask for some
proof these events actually happened but it would only result in
another of Jimmy's weeklong denial sessions.
It is ironic to point out that the same fool who figured it was okay to
handle a .22 while smashed out of his mind figured writing some
detax/sovereign citizen jibber jabber would exempt him from the law.

I'd give you his name and phone number except you'd probably twist what
he'd tell you into some kind of victory for the creators of the
strawman.

Abbot 2) Your pointless and pathetic cover-up is not worth the effort
of a real response. On this point you need jabber no more, Jimmy. You
just aren't believable.
It seems you detax boys don't care any more about the rules of gun
safety (check the chamber when you pick up a firearm and don't handle
one when you are drunk) then you care about the rules of a civilized
society (pay your taxes, don't drive drunk and don't punch traffic
cops).
What you fail to realize, you moron, is that your story only makes you
detax/sovereign citizen fools look more idiotic. . . .and you the same
for repeating it.

Your insidous demands for "proof" are simply a continuation of your
"bad jokes". Or is this a court of common law?

Abbot 3) Jimmy, your stupidity defies description. Since you don't
have proof of your claim and won't allow the reader to check it out
for himself we are left only with the irony that, in your usual
self-destructive way, you have reinforced the notion that detaxers are
little more than a band of self-immolating idiots.

Seeing that you have returned to the only tactics you seem comfortable
with. . .evasion of the subject at hand and the ad hominum attack.

[Jimmy_For_Freedom]

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Nobody

Post by Vicegerent
(Cites wil be posted when received)

I don't believe you will post any proof ever.
What's going on Eldon? Has you detax thing finally come to an end for
the year and now you need a new 'project'? This case is as full of
shit as your detax method. Please try again when you have something
concrete.
You are going to mess up Jimmy with this new scheme. Do you provide
him with the required training? He MAY not be able to be as stupid
about this as your other schemes without better training.
This has nothing to do with the Fugitive Slave act. The fellow never
volunteered to be a slave. He volunteered to be a drunk and go to
jail. You know how that works, don't you Eldon?

Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Ah, yes yet another highly improbable and undocumented tale of
success from Jimmy, the mindless detax propagandist. I'd ask for some
proof these events actually happened but it would only result in
another of Jimmy's weeklong denial sessions.
It is ironic to point out that the same fool who figured it was okay to
handle a .22 while smashed out of his mind figured writing some
detax/sovereign citizen jibber jabber would exempt him from the law.

I'd give you his name and phone number except you'd probably twist what
he'd tell you into some kind of victory for the creators of the
strawman.

Abbot 2) Your pointless and pathetic cover-up is not worth the effort
of a real response. On this point you need jabber no more, Jimmy. You
just aren't believable.
It seems you detax boys don't care any more about the rules of gun
safety (check the chamber when you pick up a firearm and don't handle
one when you are drunk) then you care about the rules of a civilized
society (pay your taxes, don't drive drunk and don't punch traffic
cops).
What you fail to realize, you moron, is that your story only makes you
detax/sovereign citizen fools look more idiotic. . . .and you the same
for repeating it.

Your insidous demands for "proof" are simply a continuation of your
"bad jokes". Or is this a court of common law?

Abbot 3) Jimmy, your stupidity defies description. Since you don't
have proof of your claim and won't allow the reader to check it out
for himself we are left only with the irony that, in your usual
self-destructive way, you have reinforced the notion that detaxers are
little more than a band of self-immolating idiots.
Seeing that you have returned to the only tactics you seem comfortable
with. . .evasion of the subject at hand and the ad hominum attack.

I see it's impossible for you to provide what you demand of others.
Another one of your "Bad Jokes", Abbot?

[Nobody]

Post by Abbot
Abbot 3) Jimmy, your stupidity defies description. Since you don't
have proof of your claim and won't allow the reader to check it
out for himself we are left only with the irony that, in your
usual self-destructive way, you have reinforced the notion that
detaxers are little more than a band of self-immolating idiots.

I have to agree that Jimmy is particularly stupid. I have stopped
responding to him as there is no point in trying to tell him anything.
A true lost cause.

[Jimmy_For_Freedom]

Post by Nobody

Post by Abbot
Abbot 3) Jimmy, your stupidity defies description. Since you don't
have proof of your claim and won't allow the reader to check it
out for himself we are left only with the irony that, in your
usual self-destructive way, you have reinforced the notion that
detaxers are little more than a band of self-immolating idiots.

I have to agree that Jimmy is particularly stupid. I have stopped
responding to him as there is no point in trying to tell him anything.
A true lost cause.

That's a typical response of someone who's left with nothing rational
to present as an argument for why Abbot posted his "Bad Jokes".

The real reason Nobody quit responding to me is because he didn't have
any more come backs when Abbot, The New Detaxer, finally admitted to
him, as I've been saying along, that he played the "Bad Jokes" on this
wall for some self serving, childish reason. From Abbot's silence when
asked for an explanation for his "Bad Jokes", we can ascertain he has a
serious mental problem - something Nobody just couldn't handle coming
from his hero.

Abbot, how could you let your protégé down like that?

[Abbot]

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Nobody

Post by Vicegerent
(Cites wil be posted when received)

I don't believe you will post any proof ever.
What's going on Eldon? Has you detax thing finally come to an end for
the year and now you need a new 'project'? This case is as full of
shit as your detax method. Please try again when you have something
concrete.
You are going to mess up Jimmy with this new scheme. Do you provide
him with the required training? He MAY not be able to be as stupid
about this as your other schemes without better training.
This has nothing to do with the Fugitive Slave act. The fellow never
volunteered to be a slave. He volunteered to be a drunk and go to
jail. You know how that works, don't you Eldon?

Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.

Abbot) Hey Jimmy it appears you can't even make up a believable lie.

According to you a drunken 50 year old "accidently" shot himself
through his chest "just above one of his lungs", then drove to the
hospital where the RCMP promptly charged him with driving and firearms
offences. Your claim is that, since the drunk had signed his driver's
license putting "without prejudice" above his signature, the following
day the same officers how charged him appeared at his home and asked
him for the documents back that they had served on him the previous
evening, thus withdrawing all charges.

Duh, that's not a very believable, lie you shit-for-brains idiot!

That means the drunken detaxer would have had to been released from the
hospital less than 24 hours after receiving a gun shot wound to the
chest!

Dang son, you are an idiot!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Yeah, tell us all the details so we can figure out who is in
with you on this lie! LOL!!!!!

[Jimmy_For_Freedom]

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Nobody

Post by Vicegerent
(Cites wil be posted when received)

I don't believe you will post any proof ever.
What's going on Eldon? Has you detax thing finally come to an end for
the year and now you need a new 'project'? This case is as full of
shit as your detax method. Please try again when you have something
concrete.
You are going to mess up Jimmy with this new scheme. Do you provide
him with the required training? He MAY not be able to be as stupid
about this as your other schemes without better training.
This has nothing to do with the Fugitive Slave act. The fellow never
volunteered to be a slave. He volunteered to be a drunk and go to
jail. You know how that works, don't you Eldon?

Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.

Abbot) Hey Jimmy it appears you can't even make up a believable lie.
According to you a drunken 50 year old "accidently" shot himself
through his chest "just above one of his lungs", then drove to the
hospital where the RCMP promptly charged him with driving and firearms
offences. Your claim is that, since the drunk had signed his driver's
license putting "without prejudice" above his signature, the following
day the same officers how charged him appeared at his home and asked
him for the documents back that they had served on him the previous
evening, thus withdrawing all charges.
Duh, that's not a very believable, lie you shit-for-brains idiot!
That means the drunken detaxer would have had to been released from the
hospital less than 24 hours after receiving a gun shot wound to the
chest!
Dang son, you are an idiot!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Yeah, tell us all the details so we can figure out who is in
with you on this lie! LOL!!!!!

Prove that I'm telling a lie! No more "bad jokes" - just the facts, ok?

[Jimmy_For_Freedom]

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Nobody

Post by Vicegerent
(Cites wil be posted when received)

I don't believe you will post any proof ever.
What's going on Eldon? Has you detax thing finally come to an end for
the year and now you need a new 'project'? This case is as full of
shit as your detax method. Please try again when you have something
concrete.
You are going to mess up Jimmy with this new scheme. Do you provide
him with the required training? He MAY not be able to be as stupid
about this as your other schemes without better training.
This has nothing to do with the Fugitive Slave act. The fellow never
volunteered to be a slave. He volunteered to be a drunk and go to
jail. You know how that works, don't you Eldon?

Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.

Abbot) Hey Jimmy it appears you can't even make up a believable lie.
According to you a drunken 50 year old "accidently" shot himself
through his chest "just above one of his lungs", then drove to the
hospital where the RCMP promptly charged him with driving and firearms
offences. Your claim is that, since the drunk had signed his driver's
license putting "without prejudice" above his signature, the following
day the same officers how charged him appeared at his home and asked
him for the documents back that they had served on him the previous
evening, thus withdrawing all charges.
Duh, that's not a very believable, lie you shit-for-brains idiot!
That means the drunken detaxer would have had to been released from the
hospital less than 24 hours after receiving a gun shot wound to the
chest!
Dang son, you are an idiot!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Yeah, tell us all the details so we can figure out who is in
with you on this lie! LOL!!!!!

Prove it that I am lying, Abbot.

By the way;

Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?

And who supports these actions as if he did them too?

Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?

[Abbot]

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.

Abbot) Hey Jimmy it appears you can't even make up a believable lie.
According to you a drunken 50 year old "accidently" shot himself
through his chest "just above one of his lungs", then drove to the
hospital where the RCMP promptly charged him with driving and firearms
offences. Your claim is that, since the drunk had signed his driver's
license putting "without prejudice" above his signature, the following
day the same officers how charged him appeared at his home and asked
him for the documents back that they had served on him the previous
evening, thus withdrawing all charges.
Duh, that's not a very believable, lie you shit-for-brains idiot!
That means the drunken detaxer would have had to been released from the
hospital less than 24 hours after receiving a gun shot wound to the
chest!
Dang son, you are an idiot!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Yeah, tell us all the details so we can figure out who is in
with you on this lie! LOL!!!!!

Prove it that I am lying, Abbot.

Abbot 2) Sure, Jimmy, give me the guy's name and contact information
and I'll be happy to check out your tale!

If you remember, Jimmy, your badly concocted tale told us the drunken
detaxer shot himself in the chest with a .22 rifle.

Not being able to explain away the
24-hour-hospital-stay-for-a-gun-shot-to-the-chest angle to your
unbelievablre story you now need to explain how the fictional detaxer
managed to carry out the improbable, indeed nearly impossible, act of
getting the muzzle of a rifle to his chest and still reach the trigger
with his finger!

Or is it your contention that firearms go off by themselves?

Make a note to yourself, Jimmy, when you or Eldon repeat this tale on
other NGs or in emails make sure you make the time lines more
believable and that you say the drunk detaxer shot himself with a
handgun.

LOL!!!!!!!!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
By the way;
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?

[Jimmy_For_Freedom]

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.

Abbot) Hey Jimmy it appears you can't even make up a believable lie.
According to you a drunken 50 year old "accidently" shot himself
through his chest "just above one of his lungs", then drove to the
hospital where the RCMP promptly charged him with driving and firearms
offences. Your claim is that, since the drunk had signed his driver's
license putting "without prejudice" above his signature, the following
day the same officers how charged him appeared at his home and asked
him for the documents back that they had served on him the previous
evening, thus withdrawing all charges.
Duh, that's not a very believable, lie you shit-for-brains idiot!
That means the drunken detaxer would have had to been released from the
hospital less than 24 hours after receiving a gun shot wound to the
chest!
Dang son, you are an idiot!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Yeah, tell us all the details so we can figure out who is in
with you on this lie! LOL!!!!!

Prove it that I am lying, Abbot.

Abbot 2) Sure, Jimmy, give me the guy's name and contact information
and I'll be happy to check out your tale!
If you remember, Jimmy, your badly concocted tale told us the drunken
detaxer shot himself in the chest with a .22 rifle.
Not being able to explain away the
24-hour-hospital-stay-for-a-gun-shot-to-the-chest angle to your
unbelievablre story you now need to explain how the fictional detaxer
managed to carry out the improbable, indeed nearly impossible, act of
getting the muzzle of a rifle to his chest and still reach the trigger
with his finger!
Or is it your contention that firearms go off by themselves?
Make a note to yourself, Jimmy, when you or Eldon repeat this tale on
other NGs or in emails make sure you make the time lines more
believable and that you say the drunk detaxer shot himself with a
handgun.
LOL!!!!!!!!

What are you trying to say?

Remember this?

Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?

And who supports these actions as if he did them too?

Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?

Your claim to credibility is doublfully credible.

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
By the way;
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?

[Abbot]

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.

Abbot) Hey Jimmy it appears you can't even make up a believable lie.
According to you a drunken 50 year old "accidently" shot himself
through his chest "just above one of his lungs", then drove to the
hospital where the RCMP promptly charged him with driving and firearms
offences. Your claim is that, since the drunk had signed his driver's
license putting "without prejudice" above his signature, the following
day the same officers how charged him appeared at his home and asked
him for the documents back that they had served on him the previous
evening, thus withdrawing all charges.
Duh, that's not a very believable, lie you shit-for-brains idiot!
That means the drunken detaxer would have had to been released from the
hospital less than 24 hours after receiving a gun shot wound to the
chest!
Dang son, you are an idiot!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Yeah, tell us all the details so we can figure out who is in
with you on this lie! LOL!!!!!

Prove it that I am lying, Abbot.

Abbot 2) Sure, Jimmy, give me the guy's name and contact information
and I'll be happy to check out your tale!
If you remember, Jimmy, your badly concocted tale told us the drunken
detaxer shot himself in the chest with a .22 rifle.
Not being able to explain away the
24-hour-hospital-stay-for-a-gun-shot-to-the-chest angle to your
unbelievablre story you now need to explain how the fictional detaxer
managed to carry out the improbable, indeed nearly impossible, act of
getting the muzzle of a rifle to his chest and still reach the trigger
with his finger!
Or is it your contention that firearms go off by themselves?
Make a note to yourself, Jimmy, when you or Eldon repeat this tale on
other NGs or in emails make sure you make the time lines more
believable and that you say the drunk detaxer shot himself with a
handgun.
LOL!!!!!!!!

What are you trying to say?

Abbot 3) It should be pretty clear, Jimmy, even to a moron like you.

Face facts, shitforbrains, you are too stupid to make up stories or
evaluate which ones are believable enough to be passed on.

Jordan Maxwell tells you courts are a racket because tennis players use
rackets on their playing courts and you believe it.

Warman tells you the all caps spelling of your name makes you a slave
on the state's make believe ship and you buy it, despite centuries of
case law to the contrary.

Now some idiot (whose name you say you will give us, but don't) tells
you this badly thought out, improbable tale of a detaxer beating a
drunk driving/weapons rap after he shoots himself in the chest with a
rifle and you don't have the basic intelligence or the critical
thinking skills necessary to figure out it a crock.

LOL!!! This is too good!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember this?
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?
Your claim to credibility is doublfully credible.

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
By the way;
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?

[Jimmy_For_Freedom]

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.

Abbot) Hey Jimmy it appears you can't even make up a believable lie.
According to you a drunken 50 year old "accidently" shot himself
through his chest "just above one of his lungs", then drove to the
hospital where the RCMP promptly charged him with driving and firearms
offences. Your claim is that, since the drunk had signed his driver's
license putting "without prejudice" above his signature, the following
day the same officers how charged him appeared at his home and asked
him for the documents back that they had served on him the previous
evening, thus withdrawing all charges.
Duh, that's not a very believable, lie you shit-for-brains idiot!
That means the drunken detaxer would have had to been released from the
hospital less than 24 hours after receiving a gun shot wound to the
chest!
Dang son, you are an idiot!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Yeah, tell us all the details so we can figure out who is in
with you on this lie! LOL!!!!!

Prove it that I am lying, Abbot.

Abbot 2) Sure, Jimmy, give me the guy's name and contact information
and I'll be happy to check out your tale!
If you remember, Jimmy, your badly concocted tale told us the drunken
detaxer shot himself in the chest with a .22 rifle.
Not being able to explain away the
24-hour-hospital-stay-for-a-gun-shot-to-the-chest angle to your
unbelievablre story you now need to explain how the fictional detaxer
managed to carry out the improbable, indeed nearly impossible, act of
getting the muzzle of a rifle to his chest and still reach the trigger
with his finger!
Or is it your contention that firearms go off by themselves?
Make a note to yourself, Jimmy, when you or Eldon repeat this tale on
other NGs or in emails make sure you make the time lines more
believable and that you say the drunk detaxer shot himself with a
handgun.
LOL!!!!!!!!

What are you trying to say?

Abbot 3) It should be pretty clear, Jimmy, even to a moron like you.
Face facts, shitforbrains, you are too stupid to make up stories or
evaluate which ones are believable enough to be passed on.

Facing the facts.... How would you face these facts, Abbot?

Remember when you uttered threats to kill yourself? uttered threats
against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like you changes a baby's diaper? steals
internet services from hotels where you aren't registered as a guest?
claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
claim to be "The New Detaxer"?

2 bits says you're a coward.

Post by Abbot
Jordan Maxwell tells you courts are a racket because tennis players use
rackets on their playing courts and you believe it.
Warman tells you the all caps spelling of your name makes you a slave
on the state's make believe ship and you buy it, despite centuries of
case law to the contrary.
Now some idiot (whose name you say you will give us, but don't) tells
you this badly thought out, improbable tale of a detaxer beating a
drunk driving/weapons rap after he shoots himself in the chest with a
rifle and you don't have the basic intelligence or the critical
thinking skills necessary to figure out it a crock.
LOL!!! This is too good!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember this?
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?
Your claim to credibility is doublfully credible.

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
By the way;
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?

[Abbot]

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.

Abbot) Hey Jimmy it appears you can't even make up a believable lie.
According to you a drunken 50 year old "accidently" shot himself
through his chest "just above one of his lungs", then drove to the
hospital where the RCMP promptly charged him with driving and firearms
offences. Your claim is that, since the drunk had signed his driver's
license putting "without prejudice" above his signature, the following
day the same officers how charged him appeared at his home and asked
him for the documents back that they had served on him the previous
evening, thus withdrawing all charges.
Duh, that's not a very believable, lie you shit-for-brains idiot!
That means the drunken detaxer would have had to been released from the
hospital less than 24 hours after receiving a gun shot wound to the
chest!
Dang son, you are an idiot!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Yeah, tell us all the details so we can figure out who is in
with you on this lie! LOL!!!!!

Prove it that I am lying, Abbot.

Abbot 2) Sure, Jimmy, give me the guy's name and contact information
and I'll be happy to check out your tale!
If you remember, Jimmy, your badly concocted tale told us the drunken
detaxer shot himself in the chest with a .22 rifle.
Not being able to explain away the
24-hour-hospital-stay-for-a-gun-shot-to-the-chest angle to your
unbelievablre story you now need to explain how the fictional detaxer
managed to carry out the improbable, indeed nearly impossible, act of
getting the muzzle of a rifle to his chest and still reach the trigger
with his finger!
Or is it your contention that firearms go off by themselves?
Make a note to yourself, Jimmy, when you or Eldon repeat this tale on
other NGs or in emails make sure you make the time lines more
believable and that you say the drunk detaxer shot himself with a
handgun.
LOL!!!!!!!!

What are you trying to say?

Abbot 3) It should be pretty clear, Jimmy, even to a moron like you.
Face facts, shitforbrains, you are too stupid to make up stories or
evaluate which ones are believable enough to be passed on.
Jordan Maxwell tells you courts are a racket because tennis players use
rackets on their playing courts and you believe it.
Warman tells you the all caps spelling of your name makes you a slave
on the state's make believe ship and you buy it, despite centuries of
case law to the contrary.
Now some idiot (whose name you say you will give us, but don't) tells
you this badly thought out, improbable tale of a detaxer beating a
drunk driving/weapons rap after he shoots himself in the chest with a
rifle and you don't have the basic intelligence or the critical
thinking skills necessary to figure out it a crock.
LOL!!! This is too good.

Facing the facts.... How would you face these facts, Abbot?

Abbot 3) You are several queations behind, Jimmyforbrains.

Slowly now, Jimmy. . . .

How is it the guy spent less than 24 hours in the hospital after a
self-administered, point blank rifle shot through the chest?

How did the guy manage to get his finger on the trigger of the rifle at
the same time he had the muzzle at his chest?

Who told this guy his without prejudice ploy would work?

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember when you uttered threats to kill yourself? uttered threats
against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like you changes a baby's diaper? steals
internet services from hotels where you aren't registered as a guest?
claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
claim to be "The New Detaxer"?
2 bits says you're a coward.

!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember this?
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?
Your claim to credibility is doublfully credible.

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
By the way;
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?

[Jimmy_For_Freedom]

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.

Abbot) Hey Jimmy it appears you can't even make up a believable lie.
According to you a drunken 50 year old "accidently" shot himself
through his chest "just above one of his lungs", then drove to the
hospital where the RCMP promptly charged him with driving and firearms
offences. Your claim is that, since the drunk had signed his driver's
license putting "without prejudice" above his signature, the following
day the same officers how charged him appeared at his home and asked
him for the documents back that they had served on him the previous
evening, thus withdrawing all charges.
Duh, that's not a very believable, lie you shit-for-brains idiot!
That means the drunken detaxer would have had to been released from the
hospital less than 24 hours after receiving a gun shot wound to the
chest!
Dang son, you are an idiot!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Yeah, tell us all the details so we can figure out who is in
with you on this lie! LOL!!!!!

Prove it that I am lying, Abbot.

Abbot 2) Sure, Jimmy, give me the guy's name and contact information
and I'll be happy to check out your tale!
If you remember, Jimmy, your badly concocted tale told us the drunken
detaxer shot himself in the chest with a .22 rifle.
Not being able to explain away the
24-hour-hospital-stay-for-a-gun-shot-to-the-chest angle to your
unbelievablre story you now need to explain how the fictional detaxer
managed to carry out the improbable, indeed nearly impossible, act of
getting the muzzle of a rifle to his chest and still reach the trigger
with his finger!
Or is it your contention that firearms go off by themselves?
Make a note to yourself, Jimmy, when you or Eldon repeat this tale on
other NGs or in emails make sure you make the time lines more
believable and that you say the drunk detaxer shot himself with a
handgun.
LOL!!!!!!!!

What are you trying to say?

Abbot 3) It should be pretty clear, Jimmy, even to a moron like you.
Face facts, shitforbrains, you are too stupid to make up stories or
evaluate which ones are believable enough to be passed on.
Jordan Maxwell tells you courts are a racket because tennis players use
rackets on their playing courts and you believe it.
Warman tells you the all caps spelling of your name makes you a slave
on the state's make believe ship and you buy it, despite centuries of
case law to the contrary.
Now some idiot (whose name you say you will give us, but don't) tells
you this badly thought out, improbable tale of a detaxer beating a
drunk driving/weapons rap after he shoots himself in the chest with a
rifle and you don't have the basic intelligence or the critical
thinking skills necessary to figure out it a crock.
LOL!!! This is too good.

Facing the facts.... How would you face these facts, Abbot?

Abbot 3) You are several queations behind, Jimmyforbrains.
Slowly now, Jimmy. . . .

Whether the guy spent less than 24 hrs or simply the weekend in the
hospital, I don't know and that doesn't make any difference. The RCMP
came to his door the upon his return home and asked for the documents
they served on him.

Try to to keep up, Abbot. How are you faceing the facts when you don't
explain your "Bad Jokes"?

Post by Abbot
How is it the guy spent less than 24 hours in the hospital after a
self-administered, point blank rifle shot through the chest?
How did the guy manage to get his finger on the trigger of the rifle at
the same time he had the muzzle at his chest?
Who told this guy his without prejudice ploy would work?

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember when you uttered threats to kill yourself? uttered threats
against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like you changes a baby's diaper? steals
internet services from hotels where you aren't registered as a guest?
claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
claim to be "The New Detaxer"?
2 bits says you're a coward.

!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember this?
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?
Your claim to credibility is doublfully credible.

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
By the way;
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?

[Abbot]

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.

Abbot) Hey Jimmy it appears you can't even make up a believable lie.
According to you a drunken 50 year old "accidently" shot himself
through his chest "just above one of his lungs", then drove to the
hospital where the RCMP promptly charged him with driving and firearms
offences. Your claim is that, since the drunk had signed his driver's
license putting "without prejudice" above his signature, the following
day the same officers how charged him appeared at his home and asked
him for the documents back that they had served on him the previous
evening, thus withdrawing all charges.
Duh, that's not a very believable, lie you shit-for-brains idiot!
That means the drunken detaxer would have had to been released from the
hospital less than 24 hours after receiving a gun shot wound to the
chest!
Dang son, you are an idiot!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Yeah, tell us all the details so we can figure out who is in
with you on this lie! LOL!!!!!

Prove it that I am lying, Abbot.

Abbot 2) Sure, Jimmy, give me the guy's name and contact information
and I'll be happy to check out your tale!
If you remember, Jimmy, your badly concocted tale told us the drunken
detaxer shot himself in the chest with a .22 rifle.
Not being able to explain away the
24-hour-hospital-stay-for-a-gun-shot-to-the-chest angle to your
unbelievablre story you now need to explain how the fictional detaxer
managed to carry out the improbable, indeed nearly impossible, act of
getting the muzzle of a rifle to his chest and still reach the trigger
with his finger!
Or is it your contention that firearms go off by themselves?
Make a note to yourself, Jimmy, when you or Eldon repeat this tale on
other NGs or in emails make sure you make the time lines more
believable and that you say the drunk detaxer shot himself with a
handgun.
LOL!!!!!!!!

What are you trying to say?

Abbot 3) It should be pretty clear, Jimmy, even to a moron like you.
Face facts, shitforbrains, you are too stupid to make up stories or
evaluate which ones are believable enough to be passed on.
Jordan Maxwell tells you courts are a racket because tennis players use
rackets on their playing courts and you believe it.
Warman tells you the all caps spelling of your name makes you a slave
on the state's make believe ship and you buy it, despite centuries of
case law to the contrary.
Now some idiot (whose name you say you will give us, but don't) tells
you this badly thought out, improbable tale of a detaxer beating a
drunk driving/weapons rap after he shoots himself in the chest with a
rifle and you don't have the basic intelligence or the critical
thinking skills necessary to figure out it a crock.
LOL!!! This is too good.

Facing the facts.... How would you face these facts, Abbot?

Abbot 3) You are several queations behind, Jimmyforbrains.
Slowly now, Jimmy. . . .

Whether the guy spent less than 24 hrs or simply the weekend in the
hospital, I don't know and that doesn't make any difference. The RCMP
came to his door the upon his return home and asked for the documents
they served on him.

Abbot 4) Well, that's just your problem, Jimmy. You don't know a
cockamamie story when you hear one.

The only believable part of this tale is that the detaxer/sovereign
citizen was a stupid drunk! People don't spent just a day in the
hospital went they get shot point blank in the chest with a rifle.
It's hard as hell it get your finger on the trigger of a rifle when
you have the muzzle on your own chest. And the "without prejudice
ploy" is a loser from way back. As we have covered several times here
attempting to impose Uniform Commercial Code provisions to criminal
cases doesn't fly. See: Barcroft v. State (Tex.App 1994) 881 SW2d
838 which applies very well to the tall tale you have passed on. In
that case the court ruled that UCC does not apply to offenses of
driving without a license, driving an unregistered vehicle, driving
without insurance, carrying a concealed weapon.

Now why don't you tell us who fed this guy this load of BS like you
said you would in the original post?

Or are you afraid that the story since the story has been outed as a
clear fabrication the guy that thought it up will look like a fool?

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Try to to keep up, Abbot. How are you faceing the facts when you don't
explain your "Bad Jokes"?

Post by Abbot
How is it the guy spent less than 24 hours in the hospital after a
self-administered, point blank rifle shot through the chest?
How did the guy manage to get his finger on the trigger of the rifle at
the same time he had the muzzle at his chest?
Who told this guy his without prejudice ploy would work?

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember when you uttered threats to kill yourself? uttered threats
against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like you changes a baby's diaper? steals
internet services from hotels where you aren't registered as a guest?
claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
claim to be "The New Detaxer"?
2 bits says you're a coward.

!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember this?
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?
Your claim to credibility is doublfully credible.

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
By the way;
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?

[Jimmy_For_Freedom]

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.

Abbot) Hey Jimmy it appears you can't even make up a believable lie.
According to you a drunken 50 year old "accidently" shot himself
through his chest "just above one of his lungs", then drove to the
hospital where the RCMP promptly charged him with driving and firearms
offences. Your claim is that, since the drunk had signed his driver's
license putting "without prejudice" above his signature, the following
day the same officers how charged him appeared at his home and asked
him for the documents back that they had served on him the previous
evening, thus withdrawing all charges.
Duh, that's not a very believable, lie you shit-for-brains idiot!
That means the drunken detaxer would have had to been released from the
hospital less than 24 hours after receiving a gun shot wound to the
chest!
Dang son, you are an idiot!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Yeah, tell us all the details so we can figure out who is in
with you on this lie! LOL!!!!!

Prove it that I am lying, Abbot.

Abbot 2) Sure, Jimmy, give me the guy's name and contact information
and I'll be happy to check out your tale!
If you remember, Jimmy, your badly concocted tale told us the drunken
detaxer shot himself in the chest with a .22 rifle.
Not being able to explain away the
24-hour-hospital-stay-for-a-gun-shot-to-the-chest angle to your
unbelievablre story you now need to explain how the fictional detaxer
managed to carry out the improbable, indeed nearly impossible, act of
getting the muzzle of a rifle to his chest and still reach the trigger
with his finger!
Or is it your contention that firearms go off by themselves?
Make a note to yourself, Jimmy, when you or Eldon repeat this tale on
other NGs or in emails make sure you make the time lines more
believable and that you say the drunk detaxer shot himself with a
handgun.
LOL!!!!!!!!

What are you trying to say?

Abbot 3) It should be pretty clear, Jimmy, even to a moron like you.
Face facts, shitforbrains, you are too stupid to make up stories or
evaluate which ones are believable enough to be passed on.
Jordan Maxwell tells you courts are a racket because tennis players use
rackets on their playing courts and you believe it.
Warman tells you the all caps spelling of your name makes you a slave
on the state's make believe ship and you buy it, despite centuries of
case law to the contrary.
Now some idiot (whose name you say you will give us, but don't) tells
you this badly thought out, improbable tale of a detaxer beating a
drunk driving/weapons rap after he shoots himself in the chest with a
rifle and you don't have the basic intelligence or the critical
thinking skills necessary to figure out it a crock.
LOL!!! This is too good.

Facing the facts.... How would you face these facts, Abbot?

Abbot 3) You are several queations behind, Jimmyforbrains.
Slowly now, Jimmy. . . .

Whether the guy spent less than 24 hrs or simply the weekend in the
hospital, I don't know and that doesn't make any difference. The RCMP
came to his door the upon his return home and asked for the documents
they served on him.

Abbot 4) Well, that's just your problem, Jimmy. You don't know a
cockamamie story when you hear one.

You're right. I guess the bandages I saw were just part of the gig. And
the red stains were probably from the paint he used to decorate his
home, right?


But how does that explain your "Bad Jokes"?

Post by Abbot
The only believable part of this tale is that the detaxer/sovereign
citizen was a stupid drunk! People don't spent just a day in the
hospital went they get shot point blank in the chest with a rifle.
It's hard as hell it get your finger on the trigger of a rifle when
you have the muzzle on your own chest. And the "without prejudice
ploy" is a loser from way back. As we have covered several times here
attempting to impose Uniform Commercial Code provisions to criminal
cases doesn't fly. See: Barcroft v. State (Tex.App 1994) 881 SW2d
838 which applies very well to the tall tale you have passed on. In
that case the court ruled that UCC does not apply to offenses of
driving without a license, driving an unregistered vehicle, driving
without insurance, carrying a concealed weapon.
Now why don't you tell us who fed this guy this load of BS like you
said you would in the original post?
Or are you afraid that the story since the story has been outed as a
clear fabrication the guy that thought it up will look like a fool?

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Try to to keep up, Abbot. How are you faceing the facts when you don't
explain your "Bad Jokes"?

Post by Abbot
How is it the guy spent less than 24 hours in the hospital after a
self-administered, point blank rifle shot through the chest?
How did the guy manage to get his finger on the trigger of the rifle at
the same time he had the muzzle at his chest?
Who told this guy his without prejudice ploy would work?

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember when you uttered threats to kill yourself? uttered threats
against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like you changes a baby's diaper? steals
internet services from hotels where you aren't registered as a guest?
claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
claim to be "The New Detaxer"?
2 bits says you're a coward.

!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember this?
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?
Your claim to credibility is doublfully credible.

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
By the way;
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?

[Abbot]

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.

Abbot) Hey Jimmy it appears you can't even make up a believable lie.
According to you a drunken 50 year old "accidently" shot himself
through his chest "just above one of his lungs", then drove to the
hospital where the RCMP promptly charged him with driving and firearms
offences. Your claim is that, since the drunk had signed his driver's
license putting "without prejudice" above his signature, the following
day the same officers how charged him appeared at his home and asked
him for the documents back that they had served on him the previous
evening, thus withdrawing all charges.
Duh, that's not a very believable, lie you shit-for-brains idiot!
That means the drunken detaxer would have had to been released from the
hospital less than 24 hours after receiving a gun shot wound to the
chest!
Dang son, you are an idiot!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Yeah, tell us all the details so we can figure out who is in
with you on this lie! LOL!!!!!

Prove it that I am lying, Abbot.

Abbot 2) Sure, Jimmy, give me the guy's name and contact information
and I'll be happy to check out your tale!
If you remember, Jimmy, your badly concocted tale told us the drunken
detaxer shot himself in the chest with a .22 rifle.
Not being able to explain away the
24-hour-hospital-stay-for-a-gun-shot-to-the-chest angle to your
unbelievablre story you now need to explain how the fictional detaxer
managed to carry out the improbable, indeed nearly impossible, act of
getting the muzzle of a rifle to his chest and still reach the trigger
with his finger!
Or is it your contention that firearms go off by themselves?
Make a note to yourself, Jimmy, when you or Eldon repeat this tale on
other NGs or in emails make sure you make the time lines more
believable and that you say the drunk detaxer shot himself with a
handgun.
LOL!!!!!!!!

What are you trying to say?

Abbot 3) It should be pretty clear, Jimmy, even to a moron like you.
Face facts, shitforbrains, you are too stupid to make up stories or
evaluate which ones are believable enough to be passed on.
Jordan Maxwell tells you courts are a racket because tennis players use
rackets on their playing courts and you believe it.
Warman tells you the all caps spelling of your name makes you a slave
on the state's make believe ship and you buy it, despite centuries of
case law to the contrary.
Now some idiot (whose name you say you will give us, but don't) tells
you this badly thought out, improbable tale of a detaxer beating a
drunk driving/weapons rap after he shoots himself in the chest with a
rifle and you don't have the basic intelligence or the critical
thinking skills necessary to figure out it a crock.
LOL!!! This is too good.

Facing the facts.... How would you face these facts, Abbot?

Abbot 3) You are several queations behind, Jimmyforbrains.
Slowly now, Jimmy. . . .

Whether the guy spent less than 24 hrs or simply the weekend in the
hospital, I don't know and that doesn't make any difference. The RCMP
came to his door the upon his return home and asked for the documents
they served on him.

Abbot 4) Well, that's just your problem, Jimmy. You don't know a
cockamamie story when you hear one.
The only believable part of this tale is that the detaxer/sovereign
citizen was a stupid drunk! People don't spent just a day in the
hospital went they get shot point blank in the chest with a rifle.
It's hard as hell it get your finger on the trigger of a rifle when
you have the muzzle on your own chest. And the "without prejudice
ploy" is a loser from way back. As we have covered several times here
attempting to impose Uniform Commercial Code provisions to criminal
cases doesn't fly. See: Barcroft v. State (Tex.App 1994) 881 SW2d
838 which applies very well to the tall tale you have passed on. In
that case the court ruled that UCC does not apply to offenses of
driving without a license, driving an unregistered vehicle, driving
without insurance, carrying a concealed weapon.
Now why don't you tell us who fed this guy this load of BS like you
said you would in the original post?
Or are you afraid that the story since the story has been outed as a
clear fabrication the guy that thought it up will look like a fool?

You're right. I guess the bandages I saw were just part of the gig. And
the red stains were probably from the paint he used to decorate his
home, right?

Abbot 5) I feel kind of bad for you, Jimmy. You are really taking a
beatin' on this one. I mean all you got is the claim that your
pathetic story is true because you say it is true. You can't explain
the semi tractor trailer sized holes in the story and don't even seem
to realize that just about all of it couldn't be true!

Now you are reduced to wise cracks based on the presumption that your
tale is true.

Why don't you just start another thread? I'll let you. I am feeling
generous today.

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
But how does that explain your "Bad Jokes"?

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Try to to keep up, Abbot. How are you faceing the facts when you don't
explain your "Bad Jokes"?

Post by Abbot
How is it the guy spent less than 24 hours in the hospital after a
self-administered, point blank rifle shot through the chest?
How did the guy manage to get his finger on the trigger of the rifle at
the same time he had the muzzle at his chest?
Who told this guy his without prejudice ploy would work?

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember when you uttered threats to kill yourself? uttered threats
against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like you changes a baby's diaper? steals
internet services from hotels where you aren't registered as a guest?
claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
claim to be "The New Detaxer"?
2 bits says you're a coward.

!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember this?
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?
Your claim to credibility is doublfully credible.

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
By the way;
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?

[Jimmy_For_Freedom]

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.

Abbot) Hey Jimmy it appears you can't even make up a believable lie.
According to you a drunken 50 year old "accidently" shot himself
through his chest "just above one of his lungs", then drove to the
hospital where the RCMP promptly charged him with driving and firearms
offences. Your claim is that, since the drunk had signed his driver's
license putting "without prejudice" above his signature, the following
day the same officers how charged him appeared at his home and asked
him for the documents back that they had served on him the previous
evening, thus withdrawing all charges.
Duh, that's not a very believable, lie you shit-for-brains idiot!
That means the drunken detaxer would have had to been released from the
hospital less than 24 hours after receiving a gun shot wound to the
chest!
Dang son, you are an idiot!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Yeah, tell us all the details so we can figure out who is in
with you on this lie! LOL!!!!!

Prove it that I am lying, Abbot.

Abbot 2) Sure, Jimmy, give me the guy's name and contact information
and I'll be happy to check out your tale!
If you remember, Jimmy, your badly concocted tale told us the drunken
detaxer shot himself in the chest with a .22 rifle.
Not being able to explain away the
24-hour-hospital-stay-for-a-gun-shot-to-the-chest angle to your
unbelievablre story you now need to explain how the fictional detaxer
managed to carry out the improbable, indeed nearly impossible, act of
getting the muzzle of a rifle to his chest and still reach the trigger
with his finger!
Or is it your contention that firearms go off by themselves?
Make a note to yourself, Jimmy, when you or Eldon repeat this tale on
other NGs or in emails make sure you make the time lines more
believable and that you say the drunk detaxer shot himself with a
handgun.
LOL!!!!!!!!

What are you trying to say?

Abbot 3) It should be pretty clear, Jimmy, even to a moron like you.
Face facts, shitforbrains, you are too stupid to make up stories or
evaluate which ones are believable enough to be passed on.
Jordan Maxwell tells you courts are a racket because tennis players use
rackets on their playing courts and you believe it.
Warman tells you the all caps spelling of your name makes you a slave
on the state's make believe ship and you buy it, despite centuries of
case law to the contrary.
Now some idiot (whose name you say you will give us, but don't) tells
you this badly thought out, improbable tale of a detaxer beating a
drunk driving/weapons rap after he shoots himself in the chest with a
rifle and you don't have the basic intelligence or the critical
thinking skills necessary to figure out it a crock.
LOL!!! This is too good.

Facing the facts.... How would you face these facts, Abbot?

Abbot 3) You are several queations behind, Jimmyforbrains.
Slowly now, Jimmy. . . .

Whether the guy spent less than 24 hrs or simply the weekend in the
hospital, I don't know and that doesn't make any difference. The RCMP
came to his door the upon his return home and asked for the documents
they served on him.

Abbot 4) Well, that's just your problem, Jimmy. You don't know a
cockamamie story when you hear one.
The only believable part of this tale is that the detaxer/sovereign
citizen was a stupid drunk! People don't spent just a day in the
hospital went they get shot point blank in the chest with a rifle.
It's hard as hell it get your finger on the trigger of a rifle when
you have the muzzle on your own chest. And the "without prejudice
ploy" is a loser from way back. As we have covered several times here
attempting to impose Uniform Commercial Code provisions to criminal
cases doesn't fly. See: Barcroft v. State (Tex.App 1994) 881 SW2d
838 which applies very well to the tall tale you have passed on. In
that case the court ruled that UCC does not apply to offenses of
driving without a license, driving an unregistered vehicle, driving
without insurance, carrying a concealed weapon.
Now why don't you tell us who fed this guy this load of BS like you
said you would in the original post?
Or are you afraid that the story since the story has been outed as a
clear fabrication the guy that thought it up will look like a fool?

You're right. I guess the bandages I saw were just part of the gig. And
the red stains were probably from the paint he used to decorate his
home, right?

Abbot 5) I feel kind of bad for you, Jimmy. You are really taking a
beatin' on this one. I mean all you got is the claim that your
pathetic story is true because you say it is true. You can't explain
the semi tractor trailer sized holes in the story and don't even seem
to realize that just about all of it couldn't be true!
Now you are reduced to wise cracks based on the presumption that your
tale is true.
Why don't you just start another thread? I'll let you. I am feeling
generous today.

Then ante up the explanation for your "bad jokes", Jerko!

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
But how does that explain your "Bad Jokes"?

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Try to to keep up, Abbot. How are you faceing the facts when you don't
explain your "Bad Jokes"?

Post by Abbot
How is it the guy spent less than 24 hours in the hospital after a
self-administered, point blank rifle shot through the chest?
How did the guy manage to get his finger on the trigger of the rifle at
the same time he had the muzzle at his chest?
Who told this guy his without prejudice ploy would work?

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember when you uttered threats to kill yourself? uttered threats
against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like you changes a baby's diaper? steals
internet services from hotels where you aren't registered as a guest?
claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
claim to be "The New Detaxer"?
2 bits says you're a coward.

!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember this?
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?
Your claim to credibility is doublfully credible.

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
By the way;
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?

[Abbot]

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.

Abbot) Hey Jimmy it appears you can't even make up a believable lie.
According to you a drunken 50 year old "accidently" shot himself
through his chest "just above one of his lungs", then drove to the
hospital where the RCMP promptly charged him with driving and firearms
offences. Your claim is that, since the drunk had signed his driver's
license putting "without prejudice" above his signature, the following
day the same officers how charged him appeared at his home and asked
him for the documents back that they had served on him the previous
evening, thus withdrawing all charges.
Duh, that's not a very believable, lie you shit-for-brains idiot!
That means the drunken detaxer would have had to been released from the
hospital less than 24 hours after receiving a gun shot wound to the
chest!
Dang son, you are an idiot!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Yeah, tell us all the details so we can figure out who is in
with you on this lie! LOL!!!!!

Prove it that I am lying, Abbot.

Abbot 2) Sure, Jimmy, give me the guy's name and contact information
and I'll be happy to check out your tale!
If you remember, Jimmy, your badly concocted tale told us the drunken
detaxer shot himself in the chest with a .22 rifle.
Not being able to explain away the
24-hour-hospital-stay-for-a-gun-shot-to-the-chest angle to your
unbelievablre story you now need to explain how the fictional detaxer
managed to carry out the improbable, indeed nearly impossible, act of
getting the muzzle of a rifle to his chest and still reach the trigger
with his finger!
Or is it your contention that firearms go off by themselves?
Make a note to yourself, Jimmy, when you or Eldon repeat this tale on
other NGs or in emails make sure you make the time lines more
believable and that you say the drunk detaxer shot himself with a
handgun.
LOL!!!!!!!!

What are you trying to say?

Abbot 3) It should be pretty clear, Jimmy, even to a moron like you.
Face facts, shitforbrains, you are too stupid to make up stories or
evaluate which ones are believable enough to be passed on.
Jordan Maxwell tells you courts are a racket because tennis players use
rackets on their playing courts and you believe it.
Warman tells you the all caps spelling of your name makes you a slave
on the state's make believe ship and you buy it, despite centuries of
case law to the contrary.
Now some idiot (whose name you say you will give us, but don't) tells
you this badly thought out, improbable tale of a detaxer beating a
drunk driving/weapons rap after he shoots himself in the chest with a
rifle and you don't have the basic intelligence or the critical
thinking skills necessary to figure out it a crock.
LOL!!! This is too good.

Facing the facts.... How would you face these facts, Abbot?

Abbot 3) You are several queations behind, Jimmyforbrains.
Slowly now, Jimmy. . . .

Whether the guy spent less than 24 hrs or simply the weekend in the
hospital, I don't know and that doesn't make any difference. The RCMP
came to his door the upon his return home and asked for the documents
they served on him.

Abbot 4) Well, that's just your problem, Jimmy. You don't know a
cockamamie story when you hear one.
The only believable part of this tale is that the detaxer/sovereign
citizen was a stupid drunk! People don't spent just a day in the
hospital went they get shot point blank in the chest with a rifle.
It's hard as hell it get your finger on the trigger of a rifle when
you have the muzzle on your own chest. And the "without prejudice
ploy" is a loser from way back. As we have covered several times here
attempting to impose Uniform Commercial Code provisions to criminal
cases doesn't fly. See: Barcroft v. State (Tex.App 1994) 881 SW2d
838 which applies very well to the tall tale you have passed on. In
that case the court ruled that UCC does not apply to offenses of
driving without a license, driving an unregistered vehicle, driving
without insurance, carrying a concealed weapon.
Now why don't you tell us who fed this guy this load of BS like you
said you would in the original post?
Or are you afraid that the story since the story has been outed as a
clear fabrication the guy that thought it up will look like a fool?

You're right. I guess the bandages I saw were just part of the gig. And
the red stains were probably from the paint he used to decorate his
home, right?

Abbot 5) I feel kind of bad for you, Jimmy. You are really taking a
beatin' on this one. I mean all you got is the claim that your
pathetic story is true because you say it is true. You can't explain
the semi tractor trailer sized holes in the story and don't even seem
to realize that just about all of it couldn't be true!
Now you are reduced to wise cracks based on the presumption that your
tale is true.
Why don't you just start another thread? I'll let you. I am feeling
generous today.

Then ante up the explanation for your "bad jokes", Jerko!

Abbot 6) Now that's not very nice, Jimmy.

If you keep that up I'll have to point out that you are a pathological
liar. That nothing you say is believable. Not your tales of success.
Not your claims to have used this or that detax method. Not your
stories (this one's laughable). Not your theories. Not your
attributions of other's motives.

And not your ad homenim attacks.

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
But how does that explain your "Bad Jokes"?

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Try to to keep up, Abbot. How are you faceing the facts when you don't
explain your "Bad Jokes"?

Post by Abbot
How is it the guy spent less than 24 hours in the hospital after a
self-administered, point blank rifle shot through the chest?
How did the guy manage to get his finger on the trigger of the rifle at
the same time he had the muzzle at his chest?
Who told this guy his without prejudice ploy would work?

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember when you uttered threats to kill yourself? uttered threats
against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like you changes a baby's diaper? steals
internet services from hotels where you aren't registered as a guest?
claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
claim to be "The New Detaxer"?
2 bits says you're a coward.

!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember this?
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?
Your claim to credibility is doublfully credible.

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
By the way;
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?

[Jimmy_For_Freedom]

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.

Abbot) Hey Jimmy it appears you can't even make up a believable lie.
According to you a drunken 50 year old "accidently" shot himself
through his chest "just above one of his lungs", then drove to the
hospital where the RCMP promptly charged him with driving and firearms
offences. Your claim is that, since the drunk had signed his driver's
license putting "without prejudice" above his signature, the following
day the same officers how charged him appeared at his home and asked
him for the documents back that they had served on him the previous
evening, thus withdrawing all charges.
Duh, that's not a very believable, lie you shit-for-brains idiot!
That means the drunken detaxer would have had to been released from the
hospital less than 24 hours after receiving a gun shot wound to the
chest!
Dang son, you are an idiot!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Yeah, tell us all the details so we can figure out who is in
with you on this lie! LOL!!!!!

Prove it that I am lying, Abbot.

Abbot 2) Sure, Jimmy, give me the guy's name and contact information
and I'll be happy to check out your tale!
If you remember, Jimmy, your badly concocted tale told us the drunken
detaxer shot himself in the chest with a .22 rifle.
Not being able to explain away the
24-hour-hospital-stay-for-a-gun-shot-to-the-chest angle to your
unbelievablre story you now need to explain how the fictional detaxer
managed to carry out the improbable, indeed nearly impossible, act of
getting the muzzle of a rifle to his chest and still reach the trigger
with his finger!
Or is it your contention that firearms go off by themselves?
Make a note to yourself, Jimmy, when you or Eldon repeat this tale on
other NGs or in emails make sure you make the time lines more
believable and that you say the drunk detaxer shot himself with a
handgun.
LOL!!!!!!!!

What are you trying to say?

Abbot 3) It should be pretty clear, Jimmy, even to a moron like you.
Face facts, shitforbrains, you are too stupid to make up stories or
evaluate which ones are believable enough to be passed on.
Jordan Maxwell tells you courts are a racket because tennis players use
rackets on their playing courts and you believe it.
Warman tells you the all caps spelling of your name makes you a slave
on the state's make believe ship and you buy it, despite centuries of
case law to the contrary.
Now some idiot (whose name you say you will give us, but don't) tells
you this badly thought out, improbable tale of a detaxer beating a
drunk driving/weapons rap after he shoots himself in the chest with a
rifle and you don't have the basic intelligence or the critical
thinking skills necessary to figure out it a crock.
LOL!!! This is too good.

Facing the facts.... How would you face these facts, Abbot?

Abbot 3) You are several queations behind, Jimmyforbrains.
Slowly now, Jimmy. . . .

Whether the guy spent less than 24 hrs or simply the weekend in the
hospital, I don't know and that doesn't make any difference. The RCMP
came to his door the upon his return home and asked for the documents
they served on him.

Abbot 4) Well, that's just your problem, Jimmy. You don't know a
cockamamie story when you hear one.
The only believable part of this tale is that the detaxer/sovereign
citizen was a stupid drunk! People don't spent just a day in the
hospital went they get shot point blank in the chest with a rifle.
It's hard as hell it get your finger on the trigger of a rifle when
you have the muzzle on your own chest. And the "without prejudice
ploy" is a loser from way back. As we have covered several times here
attempting to impose Uniform Commercial Code provisions to criminal
cases doesn't fly. See: Barcroft v. State (Tex.App 1994) 881 SW2d
838 which applies very well to the tall tale you have passed on. In
that case the court ruled that UCC does not apply to offenses of
driving without a license, driving an unregistered vehicle, driving
without insurance, carrying a concealed weapon.
Now why don't you tell us who fed this guy this load of BS like you
said you would in the original post?
Or are you afraid that the story since the story has been outed as a
clear fabrication the guy that thought it up will look like a fool?

You're right. I guess the bandages I saw were just part of the gig. And
the red stains were probably from the paint he used to decorate his
home, right?

Abbot 5) I feel kind of bad for you, Jimmy. You are really taking a
beatin' on this one. I mean all you got is the claim that your
pathetic story is true because you say it is true. You can't explain
the semi tractor trailer sized holes in the story and don't even seem
to realize that just about all of it couldn't be true!
Now you are reduced to wise cracks based on the presumption that your
tale is true.
Why don't you just start another thread? I'll let you. I am feeling
generous today.

Then ante up the explanation for your "bad jokes", Jerko!

Abbot 6) Now that's not very nice, Jimmy.
If you keep that up I'll have to point out that you are a pathological
liar. That nothing you say is believable. Not your tales of success.
Not your claims to have used this or that detax method. Not your
stories (this one's laughable). Not your theories. Not your
attributions of other's motives.
And not your ad homenim attacks.

I'm sorry, Jack'O. I forgot that you are still reelling from the
naughty chair yourself. However, I should remind you that you are in no
way in a position to advise others in that regard. Yous still haven't
faced the facts concerning your own charades. Perhaps you'd like to
take the opportunity to get that cleared up?

And while you're at it, prove I'm a liar and the term Jerko can be
downgraded a little.

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
But how does that explain your "Bad Jokes"?

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Try to to keep up, Abbot. How are you faceing the facts when you don't
explain your "Bad Jokes"?

Post by Abbot
How is it the guy spent less than 24 hours in the hospital after a
self-administered, point blank rifle shot through the chest?
How did the guy manage to get his finger on the trigger of the rifle at
the same time he had the muzzle at his chest?
Who told this guy his without prejudice ploy would work?

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember when you uttered threats to kill yourself? uttered threats
against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like you changes a baby's diaper? steals
internet services from hotels where you aren't registered as a guest?
claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
claim to be "The New Detaxer"?
2 bits says you're a coward.

!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember this?
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?
Your claim to credibility is doublfully credible.

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
By the way;
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?

[Abbot]

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.

Abbot) Hey Jimmy it appears you can't even make up a believable lie.
According to you a drunken 50 year old "accidently" shot himself
through his chest "just above one of his lungs", then drove to the
hospital where the RCMP promptly charged him with driving and firearms
offences. Your claim is that, since the drunk had signed his driver's
license putting "without prejudice" above his signature, the following
day the same officers how charged him appeared at his home and asked
him for the documents back that they had served on him the previous
evening, thus withdrawing all charges.
Duh, that's not a very believable, lie you shit-for-brains idiot!
That means the drunken detaxer would have had to been released from the
hospital less than 24 hours after receiving a gun shot wound to the
chest!
Dang son, you are an idiot!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Yeah, tell us all the details so we can figure out who is in
with you on this lie! LOL!!!!!

Prove it that I am lying, Abbot.

Abbot 2) Sure, Jimmy, give me the guy's name and contact information
and I'll be happy to check out your tale!
If you remember, Jimmy, your badly concocted tale told us the drunken
detaxer shot himself in the chest with a .22 rifle.
Not being able to explain away the
24-hour-hospital-stay-for-a-gun-shot-to-the-chest angle to your
unbelievablre story you now need to explain how the fictional detaxer
managed to carry out the improbable, indeed nearly impossible, act of
getting the muzzle of a rifle to his chest and still reach the trigger
with his finger!
Or is it your contention that firearms go off by themselves?
Make a note to yourself, Jimmy, when you or Eldon repeat this tale on
other NGs or in emails make sure you make the time lines more
believable and that you say the drunk detaxer shot himself with a
handgun.
LOL!!!!!!!!

What are you trying to say?

Abbot 3) It should be pretty clear, Jimmy, even to a moron like you.
Face facts, shitforbrains, you are too stupid to make up stories or
evaluate which ones are believable enough to be passed on.
Jordan Maxwell tells you courts are a racket because tennis players use
rackets on their playing courts and you believe it.
Warman tells you the all caps spelling of your name makes you a slave
on the state's make believe ship and you buy it, despite centuries of
case law to the contrary.
Now some idiot (whose name you say you will give us, but don't) tells
you this badly thought out, improbable tale of a detaxer beating a
drunk driving/weapons rap after he shoots himself in the chest with a
rifle and you don't have the basic intelligence or the critical
thinking skills necessary to figure out it a crock.
LOL!!! This is too good.

Facing the facts.... How would you face these facts, Abbot?

Abbot 3) You are several queations behind, Jimmyforbrains.
Slowly now, Jimmy. . . .

Whether the guy spent less than 24 hrs or simply the weekend in the
hospital, I don't know and that doesn't make any difference. The RCMP
came to his door the upon his return home and asked for the documents
they served on him.

Abbot 4) Well, that's just your problem, Jimmy. You don't know a
cockamamie story when you hear one.
The only believable part of this tale is that the detaxer/sovereign
citizen was a stupid drunk! People don't spent just a day in the
hospital went they get shot point blank in the chest with a rifle.
It's hard as hell it get your finger on the trigger of a rifle when
you have the muzzle on your own chest. And the "without prejudice
ploy" is a loser from way back. As we have covered several times here
attempting to impose Uniform Commercial Code provisions to criminal
cases doesn't fly. See: Barcroft v. State (Tex.App 1994) 881 SW2d
838 which applies very well to the tall tale you have passed on. In
that case the court ruled that UCC does not apply to offenses of
driving without a license, driving an unregistered vehicle, driving
without insurance, carrying a concealed weapon.
Now why don't you tell us who fed this guy this load of BS like you
said you would in the original post?
Or are you afraid that the story since the story has been outed as a
clear fabrication the guy that thought it up will look like a fool?

You're right. I guess the bandages I saw were just part of the gig. And
the red stains were probably from the paint he used to decorate his
home, right?

Abbot 5) I feel kind of bad for you, Jimmy. You are really taking a
beatin' on this one. I mean all you got is the claim that your
pathetic story is true because you say it is true. You can't explain
the semi tractor trailer sized holes in the story and don't even seem
to realize that just about all of it couldn't be true!
Now you are reduced to wise cracks based on the presumption that your
tale is true.
Why don't you just start another thread? I'll let you. I am feeling
generous today.

Then ante up the explanation for your "bad jokes", Jerko!

Abbot 6) Now that's not very nice, Jimmy.
If you keep that up I'll have to point out that you are a pathological
liar. That nothing you say is believable. Not your tales of success.
Not your claims to have used this or that detax method. Not your
stories (this one's laughable). Not your theories. Not your
attributions of other's motives.
And not your ad homenim attacks.

I'm sorry, Jack'O. I forgot that you are still reelling from the naughty chair yourself.

Abbot 7) You can try to change the subject all you want, but the reader
can see that your story claiming detax success makes no sense . . .and
that you don't want to talk about its absurdities if

However, I should remind you that you are in no way in a position to advise others in that regard.

Abbot 7) "Advise"?

I just want you to explain how a guy spents a just few hours in the
hospital for a point blank gun shot to the chest. . .how he manages to
shot himself with a rifle when he can't reach the trigger and how it is
the cops fell for a detax method that was laughed out of court at least
a decade ago.

Yous still haven't faced the facts concerning your own charades.

Abbot 7) That is just another of your lies, Jimmy. I have done my mea
culpa for my bad jokes countless times.

But you know that, you lying dog.

Perhaps you'd like totake the opportunity to get that cleared up?
And while you're at it, prove I'm a liar and the term Jerko can be
downgraded a little.

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
But how does that explain your "Bad Jokes"?

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Try to to keep up, Abbot. How are you faceing the facts when you don't
explain your "Bad Jokes"?

Post by Abbot
How is it the guy spent less than 24 hours in the hospital after a
self-administered, point blank rifle shot through the chest?
How did the guy manage to get his finger on the trigger of the rifle at
the same time he had the muzzle at his chest?
Who told this guy his without prejudice ploy would work?

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember when you uttered threats to kill yourself? uttered threats
against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like you changes a baby's diaper? steals
internet services from hotels where you aren't registered as a guest?
claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
claim to be "The New Detaxer"?
2 bits says you're a coward.

!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember this?
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?
Your claim to credibility is doublfully credible.

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
By the way;
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?

[Nobody]

Post by Abbot

Yous still haven't faced the facts concerning your own charades.

Abbot 7) That is just another of your lies, Jimmy. I have done my
mea culpa for my bad jokes countless times.
But you know that, you lying dog.

Of course he is a liar but I think a dog has more sense. It doesn't
matter what you say to Jimmy, his OCD issues will make him twist it out
of shape. He really needs help. You can see him lose control as he
gets frustrated with the truth.

[Jimmy_For_Freedom]

Post by Nobody

Post by Abbot

Yous still haven't faced the facts concerning your own charades.

Abbot 7) That is just another of your lies, Jimmy. I have done my
mea culpa for my bad jokes countless times.
But you know that, you lying dog.

Of course he is a liar but I think a dog has more sense. It doesn't
matter what you say to Jimmy, his OCD issues will make him twist it out
of shape. He really needs help. You can see him lose control as he
gets frustrated with the truth.

Still defending the tax cult wannabe leader who claims he has explained
his actions to those he exposed his dark side to?

[Abbot]

Post by Nobody

Post by Abbot

Yous still haven't faced the facts concerning your own charades.

Abbot 7) That is just another of your lies, Jimmy. I have done my
mea culpa for my bad jokes countless times.
But you know that, you lying dog.

Of course he is a liar but I think a dog has more sense. It doesn't
matter what you say to Jimmy, his OCD issues will make him twist it out
of shape. He really needs help. You can see him lose control as he
gets frustrated with the truth.

Abbot 8) OCD says it all. Now the poor boy is reduced to folloiwng you
and I to unrelated threads were he makes what he thinks are witty
remarks.

I consider this episode of "Exposed Jimmy Tales" done since his story
of the drunken detaxer has been pretty well destroyed. In a few days or
hours Eldon or somebody else will email him with some tale which he
will dutifully post.

And the whole thing will start again.

[Jimmy_For_Freedom]

Post by Abbot

Post by Nobody

Post by Abbot

Yous still haven't faced the facts concerning your own charades.

Abbot 7) That is just another of your lies, Jimmy. I have done my
mea culpa for my bad jokes countless times.
But you know that, you lying dog.

Of course he is a liar but I think a dog has more sense. It doesn't
matter what you say to Jimmy, his OCD issues will make him twist it out
of shape. He really needs help. You can see him lose control as he
gets frustrated with the truth.

Abbot 8) OCD says it all. Now the poor boy is reduced to folloiwng you
and I to unrelated threads were he makes what he thinks are witty
remarks.
I consider this episode of "Exposed Jimmy Tales" done since his story
of the drunken detaxer has been pretty well destroyed. In a few days or
hours Eldon or somebody else will email him with some tale which he
will dutifully post.
And the whole thing will start again.

LOL!! Prove that Eldon does that.

[Nobody]

Post by Abbot
Abbot 8) OCD says it all. Now the poor boy is reduced to folloiwng
you and I to unrelated threads were he makes what he thinks are
witty remarks.

I know. It is too funny. I had a dog that never followed that well.
He is an idiot and, unless he says something truly profound, I have
no intention of replying to him anymore.

Post by Abbot
I consider this episode of "Exposed Jimmy Tales" done since his
story of the drunken detaxer has been pretty well destroyed. In a
few days or hours Eldon or somebody else will email him with some
tale which he will dutifully post.

He asked in a previous post if I was "Still defending the tax cult
wannabe leader".

I never ever defended Eldon Warman!!

Post by Abbot
And the whole thing will start again.

Probably. Eldon should quiet down until next tax season now. Maybe
he will dream up another 'modified' detax method for then.

[Jimmy_For_Freedom]

Post by Nobody

Post by Abbot
Abbot 8) OCD says it all. Now the poor boy is reduced to folloiwng
you and I to unrelated threads were he makes what he thinks are
witty remarks.

I know. It is too funny. I had a dog that never followed that well.
He is an idiot and, unless he says something truly profound, I have
no intention of replying to him anymore.

Post by Abbot
I consider this episode of "Exposed Jimmy Tales" done since his
story of the drunken detaxer has been pretty well destroyed. In a
few days or hours Eldon or somebody else will email him with some
tale which he will dutifully post.

He asked in a previous post if I was "Still defending the tax cult
wannabe leader".
I never ever defended Eldon Warman!!

LOL!! Is Elson Warman the leader of a tax cult?

Post by Nobody

Post by Abbot
And the whole thing will start again.

Probably. Eldon should quiet down until next tax season now. Maybe
he will dream up another 'modified' detax method for then.

[Jimmy_For_Freedom]

Post by Abbot

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Hey children, a drunken local 50 year old boy stupidly and carelessly
handled a loaded 22 calibre rifle and it accidently fired a round
through his chest just above one of his lungs. Not realizing he had
shot himself, he climbs in a car his buddy, who was also drunk, was
driving. A few miles down the road he feels the warmth of his own blood
against his chest and just about freaks out. They realize they need to
get to a hospital but the buddy says he not driving there drunk. So the
shot boy takes the wheel and drives 30 miles to the nearest hospital
where the incident is reported to the RCMP. Upon learning the shot
drunk drove himself to the hospital, they promptly procede to charge
him several driving and firearms offences. However, a previous time
when he was sober, he had signed his driver's license using the
"without prejudice" above his signature. When asked for his driver's
license by the RCMP, he made it a point to inform them of that little
phrase. At the time the RCMP didn't pay much attention to the "without
prejudice" on the license. But sometime the following day, the same
officers appeared at his home and asked for the documents back that
they had served on him the previous evening. All charges were
voluntarily withdrawn by the RCMP in this case.

Abbot) Hey Jimmy it appears you can't even make up a believable lie.
According to you a drunken 50 year old "accidently" shot himself
through his chest "just above one of his lungs", then drove to the
hospital where the RCMP promptly charged him with driving and firearms
offences. Your claim is that, since the drunk had signed his driver's
license putting "without prejudice" above his signature, the following
day the same officers how charged him appeared at his home and asked
him for the documents back that they had served on him the previous
evening, thus withdrawing all charges.
Duh, that's not a very believable, lie you shit-for-brains idiot!
That means the drunken detaxer would have had to been released from the
hospital less than 24 hours after receiving a gun shot wound to the
chest!
Dang son, you are an idiot!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Maybe, just maybe there is something to "without prejudice" when used
in conjunction with your signature.
You wanna know who informed him about the use of "without prejudice"?

Abbot) Yeah, tell us all the details so we can figure out who is in
with you on this lie! LOL!!!!!

Prove it that I am lying, Abbot.

Abbot 2) Sure, Jimmy, give me the guy's name and contact information
and I'll be happy to check out your tale!
If you remember, Jimmy, your badly concocted tale told us the drunken
detaxer shot himself in the chest with a .22 rifle.
Not being able to explain away the
24-hour-hospital-stay-for-a-gun-shot-to-the-chest angle to your
unbelievablre story you now need to explain how the fictional detaxer
managed to carry out the improbable, indeed nearly impossible, act of
getting the muzzle of a rifle to his chest and still reach the trigger
with his finger!
Or is it your contention that firearms go off by themselves?
Make a note to yourself, Jimmy, when you or Eldon repeat this tale on
other NGs or in emails make sure you make the time lines more
believable and that you say the drunk detaxer shot himself with a
handgun.
LOL!!!!!!!!

What are you trying to say?

Abbot 3) It should be pretty clear, Jimmy, even to a moron like you.
Face facts, shitforbrains, you are too stupid to make up stories or
evaluate which ones are believable enough to be passed on.
Jordan Maxwell tells you courts are a racket because tennis players use
rackets on their playing courts and you believe it.
Warman tells you the all caps spelling of your name makes you a slave
on the state's make believe ship and you buy it, despite centuries of
case law to the contrary.
Now some idiot (whose name you say you will give us, but don't) tells
you this badly thought out, improbable tale of a detaxer beating a
drunk driving/weapons rap after he shoots himself in the chest with a
rifle and you don't have the basic intelligence or the critical
thinking skills necessary to figure out it a crock.
LOL!!! This is too good.

Facing the facts.... How would you face these facts, Abbot?

Abbot 3) You are several queations behind, Jimmyforbrains.
Slowly now, Jimmy. . . .

Whether the guy spent less than 24 hrs or simply the weekend in the
hospital, I don't know and that doesn't make any difference. The RCMP
came to his door the upon his return home and asked for the documents
they served on him.

Abbot 4) Well, that's just your problem, Jimmy. You don't know a
cockamamie story when you hear one.
The only believable part of this tale is that the detaxer/sovereign
citizen was a stupid drunk! People don't spent just a day in the
hospital went they get shot point blank in the chest with a rifle.
It's hard as hell it get your finger on the trigger of a rifle when
you have the muzzle on your own chest. And the "without prejudice
ploy" is a loser from way back. As we have covered several times here
attempting to impose Uniform Commercial Code provisions to criminal
cases doesn't fly. See: Barcroft v. State (Tex.App 1994) 881 SW2d
838 which applies very well to the tall tale you have passed on. In
that case the court ruled that UCC does not apply to offenses of
driving without a license, driving an unregistered vehicle, driving
without insurance, carrying a concealed weapon.
Now why don't you tell us who fed this guy this load of BS like you
said you would in the original post?
Or are you afraid that the story since the story has been outed as a
clear fabrication the guy that thought it up will look like a fool?

You're right. I guess the bandages I saw were just part of the gig. And
the red stains were probably from the paint he used to decorate his
home, right?

Abbot 5) I feel kind of bad for you, Jimmy. You are really taking a
beatin' on this one. I mean all you got is the claim that your
pathetic story is true because you say it is true. You can't explain
the semi tractor trailer sized holes in the story and don't even seem
to realize that just about all of it couldn't be true!
Now you are reduced to wise cracks based on the presumption that your
tale is true.
Why don't you just start another thread? I'll let you. I am feeling
generous today.

Then ante up the explanation for your "bad jokes", Jerko!

Abbot 6) Now that's not very nice, Jimmy.
If you keep that up I'll have to point out that you are a pathological
liar. That nothing you say is believable. Not your tales of success.
Not your claims to have used this or that detax method. Not your
stories (this one's laughable). Not your theories. Not your
attributions of other's motives.
And not your ad homenim attacks.

I'm sorry, Jack'O. I forgot that you are still reelling from the naughty chair yourself.

Abbot 7) You can try to change the subject all you want, but the reader
can see that your story claiming detax success makes no sense . . .and
that you don't want to talk about its absurdities if

However, I should remind you that you are in no way in a position to advise others in that regard.

Abbot 7) "Advise"?
I just want you to explain how a guy spents a just few hours in the
hospital for a point blank gun shot to the chest. . .how he manages to
shot himself with a rifle when he can't reach the trigger and how it is
the cops fell for a detax method that was laughed out of court at least
a decade ago.

Yous still haven't faced the facts concerning your own charades.

Abbot 7) That is just another of your lies, Jimmy. I have done my mea
culpa for my bad jokes countless times.

No, you have not uttered even one explanation for your sorry tale.

Post by Abbot
But you know that, you lying dog.

Therefore, that makes you what you claim I am.

Post by Abbot

Perhaps you'd like totake the opportunity to get that cleared up?
And while you're at it, prove I'm a liar and the term Jerko can be
downgraded a little.

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
But how does that explain your "Bad Jokes"?

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Try to to keep up, Abbot. How are you faceing the facts when you don't
explain your "Bad Jokes"?

Post by Abbot
How is it the guy spent less than 24 hours in the hospital after a
self-administered, point blank rifle shot through the chest?
How did the guy manage to get his finger on the trigger of the rifle at
the same time he had the muzzle at his chest?
Who told this guy his without prejudice ploy would work?

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember when you uttered threats to kill yourself? uttered threats
against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like you changes a baby's diaper? steals
internet services from hotels where you aren't registered as a guest?
claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
claim to be "The New Detaxer"?
2 bits says you're a coward.

!

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
Remember this?
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?
Your claim to credibility is doublfully credible.

Post by Abbot

Post by Jimmy_For_Freedom
By the way;
Who uttered threats to kill himself? Who uttered threats against Eldon,
Star,
Ron, Diablo and myself? Who spammed this wall with hundreds of lines of
nothing? Who wanted in on taking care of a certain damage control goon?
Who changes his nick like he changes a baby's diaper? Who steals
internet services from hotels where he isn't even a guest? Who claimed
they were simply "Bad Jokes, ng jinx, and slightly misspoken words?
And who supports these actions as if he did them too?
Who claim to be "The New Detaxers"?

[Nobody]

Post by Abbot
Abbot 2) Sure, Jimmy, give me the guy's name and contact
information and I'll be happy to check out your tale!
If you remember, Jimmy, your badly concocted tale told us the
drunken detaxer shot himself in the chest with a .22 rifle.
Not being able to explain away the
24-hour-hospital-stay-for-a-gun-shot-to-the-chest angle to your
unbelievablre story you now need to explain how the fictional
detaxer managed to carry out the improbable, indeed nearly
impossible, act of getting the muzzle of a rifle to his chest and
still reach the trigger with his finger!
Or is it your contention that firearms go off by themselves?
Make a note to yourself, Jimmy, when you or Eldon repeat this tale
on other NGs or in emails make sure you make the time lines more
believable and that you say the drunk detaxer shot himself with a
handgun.

Abbot, you must have the patience of Job to keep replying to such an
idiot. Jimmy makes no sense whatsoever. It doesn't matter how bad
he is spanked, he just keeps on going. Like the Energiser bunny.

[Abbot]

Post by Vicegerent
See Fugitive Slave Act 1850 (US) Section 6,
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/fugitive.htm
Yes it is American, but it is a statement of
Roman law, the system of false law also
used in Canada on dealing with 'disobedient
slaves'.
And, yes, it is acknowledged that the original 14th
Amendment that overwrote the original 13th
Amendment of the US CON-stitution, eliminated
'involuntary servitude';

Abbot) So you are admitting your past statements dismissing the 13th
amendment were wrong. That being the case how can slavery, per the
Fugitive Slave Act, be legal in the U.S. as you claim?

Post by Vicegerent
however people are tricked into 'volunteering to be slaves', by their use of the
State or Crown owned Birth Certificate name.

Abbot) So it's not the Fugitive Slave Act that, according to you, makes
one a slave. To you the slavery/jurisdiction takes place when one has
his name printed on a birth certificate.

So, Eldon, how did my great grand father who had his name printed only
in the family Bible fall under the jurisdiction of the state of
Massachusetts when he drove his wagon down the street with a snoot
full?

Post by Vicegerent
Vicegerent

[Vicegerent]

SEVERINO and SIMON cases (USA). Briefly:
(Cites wil be posted when received)

SEVERINO was driving drunk. THIS TIME, a cop made
a mistake, he MIRANDIZED Severino; who was not
too drunk to 'lawyer up'. They convicted him anyway.

The attorney general then had to explain why traffic
offenders are neither Mirandized nor Indicted.
"No Miranda warnings need be given since this is
a civil (breach of fictitious contract) matter."

Also, Simon tried to raise the ALL CAPS defense.
Miraculously, the jury foreman picked up the issue,
demanding to be informed of how the State acquired
IN REM jurisdiction of the motor vehicle, and
IN PERSONEM jurisdiction over the driver.

The fascist stooge on the bench bumbled. Translation:

In rem jurisdiction of the motor vehicle is based upon
a PRESUMPTION that the 'State is vested with
Title' to all property in the venue.

In personem jurisdiction of the driver is based upon
a FICTITIOUS enlistment, employment (persons
employ tools), or slavery contract.
(All three represent 'fictitious' contracts of
servitude)
* * * * * * * * * * * *

There you have it. The cop stops you for some
motor vehicle infraction - no victim. You are
'presumed' to be using State or Provincial
property. The fiction name on the State or
Provinically owned driver's license you carry
is 'presumed' to be a 'person' (fictional status)
attached to you which is under a contract
of servitude. You are considered to be a
'disobedient slave' without right to enter evidence
on your own behalf. The 'certificate' of an officer
is sufficient for conviction.

See Fugitive Slave Act 1850 (US) Section 6,
last part:
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/fugitive.htm
Yes it is American, but it is a statement of
Roman law, the system of false law also
used in Canada on dealing with 'disobedient
slaves'.

And, yes, it is acknowledged that the original 14th
Amendment that overwrote the original 13th
Amendment of the US CON-stitution, eliminated
'involuntary servitude'; however people are tricked
into 'volunteering to be slaves', by their use of the
State or Crown owned Birth Certificate name.

Vicegerent

[Abbot]

Post by Vicegerent
(Cites wil be posted when received)

Abbot) Eldon, the citation for the case is State v. Severino (Haw.
1975), 537 P.2d 1187). I figured you were too impaired and dishonest
to come up with it yourself, so I did the scholarship you should have,
had you been sane and honest.

Looking up the case it seems the points of law in play were 1) Whether
Severino's refusal to take the breathalyzer test until an attorney
was consulted constituted a refusal to submit to the test and; 2)
Whether the question is asked pursuant to Severnio's DUI violation a,
criminal offense, or with regard to an implied consent violation
(refusing to take the test), which is civil in nature.

Nowhere in this 31-year-old case do I see record of the all caps theory
or the Fugitive Slave Act being addressed, as you infer.

Please explain.

Post by Vicegerent
SEVERINO was driving drunk. THIS TIME, a cop made
a mistake, he MIRANDIZED Severino; who was not
too drunk to 'lawyer up'. They convicted him anyway.
The attorney general then had to explain why traffic
offenders are neither Mirandized nor Indicted.
"No Miranda warnings need be given since this is
a civil (breach of fictitious contract) matter."
Also, Simon tried to raise the ALL CAPS defense.
Miraculously, the jury foreman picked up the issue,
demanding to be informed of how the State acquired
IN REM jurisdiction of the motor vehicle, and
IN PERSONEM jurisdiction over the driver.
In rem jurisdiction of the motor vehicle is based upon
a PRESUMPTION that the 'State is vested with
Title' to all property in the venue.
In personem jurisdiction of the driver is based upon
a FICTITIOUS enlistment, employment (persons
employ tools), or slavery contract.
(All three represent 'fictitious' contracts of
servitude)
* * * * * * * * * * * *
There you have it. The cop stops you for some
motor vehicle infraction - no victim. You are
'presumed' to be using State or Provincial
property. The fiction name on the State or
Provinically owned driver's license you carry
is 'presumed' to be a 'person' (fictional status)
attached to you which is under a contract
of servitude. You are considered to be a
'disobedient slave' without right to enter evidence
on your own behalf. The 'certificate' of an officer
is sufficient for conviction.
See Fugitive Slave Act 1850 (US) Section 6,
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/fugitive.htm
Yes it is American, but it is a statement of
Roman law, the system of false law also
used in Canada on dealing with 'disobedient
slaves'.
And, yes, it is acknowledged that the original 14th
Amendment that overwrote the original 13th
Amendment of the US CON-stitution, eliminated
'involuntary servitude'; however people are tricked
into 'volunteering to be slaves', by their use of the
State or Crown owned Birth Certificate name.
Vicegerent

[Vicegerent]

SEVERINO and SIMON cases (USA). Briefly:
(Cites wil be posted when received)

SEVERINO was driving drunk. THIS TIME, a cop made
a mistake, he MIRANDIZED Severino; who was not
too drunk to 'lawyer up'. They convicted him anyway.

The attorney general then had to explain why traffic
offenders are neither Mirandized nor Indicted.
"No Miranda warnings need be given since this is
a civil (breach of fictitious contract) matter."

Also, Simon tried to raise the ALL CAPS defense.
Miraculously, the jury foreman picked up the issue,
demanding to be informed of how the State acquired
IN REM jurisdiction of the motor vehicle, and
IN PERSONEM jurisdiction over the driver.

The fascist stooge on the bench bumbled. Translation:

In rem jurisdiction of the motor vehicle is based upon
a PRESUMPTION that the 'State is vested with
Title' to all property in the venue.

In personem jurisdiction of the driver is based upon
a FICTITIOUS enlistment, employment (persons
employ tools), or slavery contract.
(All three represent 'fictitious' contracts of
servitude)
* * * * * * * * * * * *

There you have it. The cop stops you for some
motor vehicle infraction - no victim. You are
'presumed' to be using State or Provincial
property. The fiction name on the State or
Provinically owned driver's license you carry
is 'presumed' to be a 'person' (fictional status)
attached to you which is under a contract
of servitude. You are considered to be a
'disobedient slave' without right to enter evidence
on your own behalf. The 'certificate' of an officer
is sufficient for conviction.

See Fugitive Slave Act 1850 (US) Section 6,
last part:
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/fugitive.htm
Yes it is American, but it is a statement of
Roman law, the system of false law also
used in Canada on dealing with 'disobedient
slaves'.

And, yes, it is acknowledged that the original 14th
Amendment that overwrote the original 13th
Amendment of the US CON-stitution, eliminated
'involuntary servitude'; however people are tricked
into 'volunteering to be slaves', by their use of the
State or Crown owned Birth Certificate name.

Vicegerent